{"id":2431,"date":"2024-11-13T19:02:49","date_gmt":"2024-11-13T19:02:49","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/bluelightnews.com\/rubio-report-casts-spotlight-on-trump-transition-leaks\/"},"modified":"2024-11-13T19:02:49","modified_gmt":"2024-11-13T19:02:49","slug":"rubio-report-casts-spotlight-on-trump-transition-leaks","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/bluelightnews.com\/category\/politics\/rubio-report-casts-spotlight-on-trump-transition-leaks\/","title":{"rendered":"Rubio report casts spotlight on Trump transition leaks"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

News of Marco Rubio\u2019s selection as Donald Trump\u2019s secretary of State Monday night prompted a flurry of reports about Trump\u2019s forthcoming announcement of one of his most important cabinet positions.<\/p>\n

Except Tuesday rolled around, and now Wednesday, and Trump has yet to officially name Rubio as his pick.<\/p>\n

As of midday Wednesday, more than 41 hours have passed since the New York Times reported Trump would tap Rubio, a report Blue Light News and other major outlets quickly confirmed.<\/p>\n

The Rubio news was the most notable in a series of leaks in recent days about Trump\u2019s still-forming cabinet \u2014 a stark contrast to the nearly two-year presidential campaign his team ran that was relatively leak-free. According to a count by Blue Light News, half the Cabinet and senior staff decisions so far were shared with the press first.<\/p>\n

The Rubio non-announcement set off speculation \u2014 especially among those hoping to see Ric Grenell in the role \u2014 about whether his appointment was real or a leak meant to force Trump\u2019s hand.<\/p>\n

The leaks and lag time between reports about personnel decisions and their official confirmation has called into question whether his political operation, widely hailed as professional over the last two years, will continue as such into Trump\u2019s second White House. Trump\u2019s circle of influence is quickly growing as he has brought in additional transition advisers and is naming new administration appointees.<\/p>\n

The confusion and apparent disorganization about staffing rollouts has even set off conspiracy theories within his MAGA base about whether the selections were actually Trump\u2019s. And they have frustrated some of Trump\u2019s longtime aides.<\/p>\n

\u201cThe president is busy with people in his ear and he’s in meetings all day. And it’s difficult for his staff to get statements in front of him and approved at this point, unlike on the campaign where things were getting out the door immediately,\u201d said a person familiar with the transition process granted anonymity to discuss internal dealings.<\/p>\n

Some 18 hours passed between when the Wall Street Journal first reported Monday evening that Trump was appointing Rep. Mike Waltz as national security adviser, and when his transition officially announced it on Tuesday afternoon.<\/p>\n

Nearly 19 hours went by in the case of South Dakota Gov. Kristi Noem. BLN reported in the early hours of Tuesday morning that she was tapped to be secretary of Homeland Security, later confirmed by an official statement Tuesday night.<\/p>\n

A trickle of leaks about the four deputy White House chief of staff positions came on Monday and Tuesday \u2014 with Vice President-elect JD Vance confirming one of those on X \u2014 before Trump\u2019s team announced late Wednesday morning that Dan Scavino, Stephen Miller, James Blair and Taylor Budowich would each serve as co-deputy chiefs of staff.<\/p>\n

Susie Wiles, Trump\u2019s co-campaign manager, who he has since named White House chief of staff, was widely credited with preventing both unauthorized leaks to the news media and the infighting that was previously common within Trump world.<\/p>\n

Now, finger-pointing has begun behind the scenes about who has been behind the leaks, and why they sought to get ahead of Trump or the official press office. It did not go unnoticed by some on Trump\u2019s team that the leaks were going to top reporters at some of the mainstream outlets Trump rails against the most, like BLN and the New York Times.<\/p>\n

An adviser to Rubio did not respond to a request for comment.<\/p>\n

Here\u2019s a look at the timing of cabinet appointees,<\/b> from when they were first reported in the media to when an official statement was released:<\/p>\n