{"id":16836,"date":"2025-12-17T16:18:06","date_gmt":"2025-12-17T16:18:06","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/bluelightnews.com\/category\/politics\/jack-smith-makes-his-case-against-trump-in-closed-door-deposition\/"},"modified":"2025-12-17T16:18:06","modified_gmt":"2025-12-17T16:18:06","slug":"jack-smith-makes-his-case-against-trump-in-closed-door-deposition","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/bluelightnews.com\/category\/politics\/jack-smith-makes-his-case-against-trump-in-closed-door-deposition\/","title":{"rendered":"Jack Smith makes his case against Trump in closed-door deposition"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Former special counsel Jack Smith, who led the federal criminal cases against President Donald Trump during the Biden administration, has kicked off what is expected to be an hourslong closed-door deposition with members of the House Judiciary Committee.<\/p>\n

In his opening statement to lawmakers, portions of which were obtained by Blue Light News, Smith defended his findings of allegations that that Trump mishandled classified documents and sought to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election.<\/p>\n

\u201cThe decision to bring charges against President Trump was mine, but the basis for those charges rests entirely with President Trump and his actions, as alleged in the indictments returned by grand juries in two different districts,\u201d said Smith, according to a copy of portions of that statement.<\/p>\n

He maintained that this team found evidence to prove \u201cbeyond a reasonable doubt that President Trump engaged in a criminal scheme to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election and to prevent the lawful transfer of power.\u201d<\/p>\n

Smith also said his team found “powerful evidence\u201d in the classified documents case and alleged that the president \u201crepeatedly tried to obstruct justice.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201cI made my decisions in the investigation without regard to President Trump\u2019s political association, activities, beliefs, or candidacy in the 2024 presidential election,\u201d Smith said in his statement. \u201cWe took actions based on what the facts and the law required \u2014 the very lesson I learned early in my career as a prosecutor.\u201d<\/p>\n

He added that he would have made the same decision if Trump had been a Democrat or a Republican \u2014 a nod to the GOP members of the committee who believe Smith was pursuing a partisan witch hunt against the president. Their fury has only intensified in the wake of recent revelations Smith secretly obtained phone records of at least eight Republican senators in his election interference probe.<\/p>\n

Smith also defended that decision to request lawmakers\u2019 phone data, for which Smith\u2019s team did not receive the content of the calls.<\/p>\n

\u201cExploiting that violence, President Trump and his associates tried to call Members of Congress in furtherance of their criminal scheme, urging them to further delay certification of the 2020 election,\u201d Smith said. \u201cI didn\u2019t choose those Members; President Trump did.\u201d<\/p>\n

The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment.<\/p>\n

In the wake of repeated calls for his prosecution from Republicans and Trump himself, Smith faces unique political and legal risks<\/u><\/a>. His testimony is hamstrung by grand jury secrecy rules and Justice Department policy \u2014 as well as an order from a federal judge in Florida that the second volume of his report surrounding the classified documents case remain under seal.<\/p>\n

Smith, however, is hoping to defend his record as a career prosecutor from Republican allegations that he shepherded a weaponization of the Justice Department against conservatives \u2014 to the extent he could.<\/p>\n

Walking into the deposition room, Smith did not answer shouted questions from reporters.<\/p>\n

\u201cThe hunters become the hunted, huh?\u201d someone shouted from the rowdy crowd swarming the former prosecutor.<\/p>\n

Smith is represented by the big law giant Covington & Burling, which was sanctioned<\/u><\/a> by the Trump administration earlier this year after revelations that it was providing free legal services to Smith. The move suspended security clearances for lawyers at the firm.<\/p>\n

\u201cIn today testifying before this committee, Jack is showing tremendous courage in light of the remarkable and unprecedented retribution campaign against him by this administration and this White House,\u201d one of Smith\u2019s attorneys, Lanny Breuer, told reporters. \u201cLet’s be clear: Jack Smith, a career prosecutor, conducted this investigation based on the facts and based on the law and nothing more.\u201d<\/p>\n

Breuer said his client \u201clooks forward\u201d to answering questions surrounding both of the cases he oversaw: the classified documents case and the case surrounding Trump\u2019s efforts to subvert the results of the 2020 election. Smith was forced to drop both cases after Trump\u2019s electoral victory in 2024, citing Justice Department policy against prosecuting a sitting president.<\/p>\n

A number of lawmakers filed into the deposition room Wednesday to watch the questioning \u2014 among them Reps. Scott Fitzgerald (R-Wis.), Ben Cline (R-Va.), Jared Moskowitz (D-Fla.) and Hank Johnson (D-Ga.). House Judiciary Committee chair Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) and ranking member Jamie Raskin (D-Md.) are also attending.<\/p>\n

Moskowitz, leaving the room early in the deposition, said the interview had been \u201cboring.\u201d<\/p>\n

Smith had been requesting a public forum for his testimony to set the record straight about the scope of his work and the cases he would have pursued against Trump.<\/p>\n

Jordan, however, declined that request, instead opting for a deposition behind closed doors.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Former special counsel Jack Smith, who led the federal criminal cases against President Donald Trump during the Biden administration, has kicked off what is expected to be an hourslong closed-door deposition with members of the House Judiciary Committee. In his opening statement to lawmakers, portions of which were obtained by Blue Light News, Smith defended […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-16836","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-congress"],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/bluelightnews.com\/category\/politics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16836","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/bluelightnews.com\/category\/politics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/bluelightnews.com\/category\/politics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bluelightnews.com\/category\/politics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bluelightnews.com\/category\/politics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=16836"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/bluelightnews.com\/category\/politics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16836\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/bluelightnews.com\/category\/politics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=16836"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bluelightnews.com\/category\/politics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=16836"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bluelightnews.com\/category\/politics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=16836"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}