Connect with us

Congress

Trump says federal government should ‘take over’ local politics in DC

Published

on

President Donald Trump said he was thinking about taking over local politics in the District of Columbia, a move that’d reignite controversy about the authority of the nation’s capital city to govern itself.

“The federal government should take over the governance of D.C. and run it really, really properly,” Trump told reporters on Air Force One on Wednesday. “We should run it strong, run it with law and order, make it absolutely flawless.”

Trump has toyed with the idea of overtaking local politics since his first term, but this desire has intensified in recent years following a massive post-pandemic crime wave that has since cooled. In 2023, homicides surged to a decades-long peak of 273 cases, though this figure dipped by 32 percent in 2024, according toD.C. police data. Trump has also cast homelessness in D.C. — which has modestly increased in recent years but still remains below pre-pandemic levels — as a choke point for the local government.

These issues prompted Trump to deride the city as one of “filth” and “decay” in a rare trip to the District in between his two terms in August 2023, in which he pleaded not guilty to four counts to overturn the 2020 elections.

Trump has several means to reshape local politics in Washington, unique to the city in a way a president cannot influence individual states. Congress — with the signoff of the president — can undercut the District’s political machinery by rejecting bills the city council puts forward and proposing their own. And if Congress and the president are aligned, they could even undo a 1970s-era law called the Home Rule Act which allows the nation’s capital to largely govern itself by electing its own mayor and city council.

“I get along great with the mayor,” Trump said Wednesday. “They’re not doing the job — too much crime, too much graffiti, too many tents on the lawns.”

Republicans in Congress have tried to override Home Rule for years, but these efforts have been toothless because of Democratic opposition in Congress or the White House. And even when Republicans gained control of the House and Senate during Trump’s first term, he didn’t follow through on his threats to reform the city, including one that would have allowed him to overtake agencies like the local police.

This time, a reenergized Trump is now saying he wants to tighten his grip on the capital city. And allies in Congress have already proposed legislation looking to undo the Home Rule Act.

Eliminating home rule — or even more actively rejecting individual pieces of city legislation — would drastically alter the power balance of the local and federal government. About two years ago, Congress blocked local efforts to decrease crime penalties, marking the first time in three decades that Capitol Hill officials successfully nixed local laws. (Congress has also passed riders blocking commercial sales of recreational marijuana in the city.)

Any move from the Trump administration to overtake the District would almost certainly inflame city residents, and Democrats more broadly, who have complained about the city’s governing structure. Many District residents and politicians have advocated for statehood, which would give Washington full representation in Congress and more autonomy from the federal government.

“I’m the duly elected mayor of the District of Columbia and the lawful CEO of the District of Columbia,” Mayor Muriel Bowser said Thursday about Trump’s latest remarks. “That’s just an unnecessary distraction.”

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Congress

Trump continues to muddy the waters on path forward for budget plan

Published

on

Donald Trump is continuing to complicate the path forward for congressional Republicans, who are desperate for clarity on what the president wants them to do to enact his massive domestic agenda.

In comments on Brian Kilmeade’s radio show Friday, Trump openly entertained a notion that the GOP’s efforts to extend expiring tax cuts with new policies on border security and energy production may need to be broken up into smaller bills to clear Congress.

The Senate approved a budget resolution early in the morning after hours of amendment votes that would pave the way for two bills to accomplish those priorities, while the House is set to muscle through a budget blueprint next week that would set the stage for one piece of legislation encapsulating everything.

“Now what they approved yesterday is one part of it, and then they approve another part of it,” Trump said on Kilmeade’s radio show. “And, you know, you could, I guess, you could make the case. You could do three. You could do 10.”

Speaker Mike Johnson is trying to flip remaining holdouts and push through his budget plan — before the process goes further off the rails as vulnerable Republicans and others in safer red districts revolt over proposals for steep cuts to Medicaid and other safety net programs on which their constituents rely.

House GOP leaders are also continuing to warn that one massive bill is the only way to get Trump’s agenda through the razor-thin GOP majority. They’ve argued for months that hard-liners will kill a separate tax package if it’s broken off and left for a second bill, as senators have proposed.

“As long as we get them all added up and it’s the same thing,” Trump insisted on Friday. “And, you know, I think we’re in very good shape.”

Continue Reading

Congress

Capitol agenda: What you missed in the overnight vote-a-rama

Published

on

Senate Republicans just approved their budget resolution after a more than 10-hour vote-a-rama. For now, it’s the GOP’s “Plan B,” as Trump’s preferred budget may not have the support to move ahead next week in the House.

Senators slogged through 25 roll-call votes on amendments as Democrats tried to squeeze the opposing party and lay the groundwork for 2026 attack ads.

Some Republicans grumbled about having to go through the exercise. Sen. Josh Hawley told reporters he spoke to Trump on Thursday evening, relaying that while the president did give a “little nod” towards the Senate budget in a Truth Social post, “He made clear to me … he wants one big, beautiful bill. He said that two or three times on the phone.”

Senators have insisted their resolution is just a back-up plan if Speaker Mike Johnson can’t get his one-bill version approved in the House. Still, Hawley wasn’t convinced — and neither, apparently, is Trump. Asked Thursday night why the Senate was still moving ahead on a strategy Trump doesn’t support, Hawley replied: “Great question. That’s sort of what he said to me.”

Four Republican senators sided several times with Democrats on amendment votes: Hawley and Sens. Susan Collins, Lisa Murkowski and Dan Sullivan. Hawley ended up voting for the budget resolution, making Sen. Rand Paul the only GOP holdout, along with all Democrats.

Some amendment fights you missed overnight:

  • The Senate voted 49-51 to reject an amendment from Democratic Sen. Tammy Duckworth that would protect the right to fertility care and require insurers to cover in vitro fertilization. Duckworth called a recent IVF executive order from Trump “toothless, overly vague.” GOP Sen. Katie Britt called the amendment “nothing more than a Trojan horse” proposal that could allow for human cloning and “gene-edited designer babies.”
  • Rand offered an amendment to add $1.5 trillion in spending cuts under the Senate plan, to mirror the slashing required under the House Republican budget. Senate Republicans were mostly a no, tanking the amendment 24-76.
  • One of the only amendments adopted was a largely symbolic change offered by Sullivan to protect Medicare and Medicaid, though some Democrats argued that it would effectively raise the age of Medicare eligibility and cut benefits.

The battle is just getting started. The House and Senate need to adopt identical budget resolutions to move onto the next step: committees getting to work on recommendations for additional spending and funding cuts. And the House intends to take up a vastly different blueprint next week that would pave the way for one mammoth package on border, energy and tax policies rather than splitting off taxes into separate legislation.
Johnson is bullish he’ll find the support for his budget resolution next week, even as some of his members face constituent anger back in their districts over potential cuts. We’ll see if he’s able to muscle it through his narrow majority — and if senators will agree to throw out their budget if he does.

What else we’re watching:

  • DOGE flak: A few Republicans are starting to take their concerns public. Ohio Rep. Troy Balderson lamented to a business group in his district that Trump’s executive orders are “getting out of control” and eroding Congress’ power (he later posted on X that he fully supports Trump’s agenda and wants Congress to make his executive actions permanent). Meanwhile, Georgia Rep. Rich McCormick was met with anger over DOGE’s cuts in a town hall, as well as possible cuts to Social Security and Medicaid. Reps. Cliff Bentz and Stephanie Bice also appeared to take some heat.
  • Cue the stopgap: The chance that negotiators reach a funding deal before the March 14 shutdown deadline is diminishing. Appropriations Chair Susan Collins said negotiators “appear to be at an impasse,” while top Democratic appropriator Patty Murray said even if they do get a deal on toplines soon, they may need more time to assemble the 12 funding bills. 
  • Donalds for governor: Rep. Byron Donalds is signaling he might run for Florida governor in 2026, after Trump said in a Truth Social post that the congressman would have his “total endorsement.” Donalds teased there was an “announcement coming soon.”
Continue Reading

Congress

Senate trudges through vote-a-rama to ready a backup budget

Published

on

Senate Republicans are on track to adopt their budget resolution in the early hours of Friday morning — a bid to show support for a “Plan B” if House GOP lawmakers can’t unite around their more expansive vision for a party-line package necessary to enact President Donald Trump’s legislative agenda.

Senators had voted on more than 10 amendments to their budget resolution before midnight, with plans to continue their “vote-a-rama” into the night. Democrats are using the marathon amendment process to score political points, hoping it will pay dividends in 2026.

“Families lose, billionaires win. That is the proposition at the heart of the Republican budget resolution,” the Senate Budget Committee’s top Democrat, Oregon Sen. Jeff Merkley, said on the floor. “We will see tonight that Democrats vote against irreparable increases in the deficit, and Republicans vote to explode the deficit.”

Democrats have so far used the amendment free-for-all to repeatedly force their GOP colleagues to go on the record against protecting Medicare and Medicaid. They also offered amendments on stopping hedge funds from buying single-family homes, supporting wildland firefighters and rehiring federal workers who have been fired in the first weeks of the Trump administration.

Senate Democrats will be able to hone their attacks on Republicans’ party-line ambitions later, when GOP leaders in the chamber craft the actual reconciliation bill to deliver on Trump’s biggest policy priorities. The budget resolution, just 62-pages long, merely lays out the framework for the final product, which would allow for $150 billion in new defense spending and up to $175 billion in new spending on border security, plus require billions of dollars in savings from education, labor, energy and agriculture programs.

“One can predict where they’re going based on the numbers that they’re providing. Sure does look like Medicaid cuts in what they’re pushing for, and not small Medicaid cuts either. Huge Medicaid cuts,” Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.) said in a brief interview.

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer offered an amendment to block Republicans from enacting tax cuts if the GOP cuts even $1 from Medicaid. At one point, Sen. Dan Sullivan (R-Alaska) attempted to give Republicans some cover, putting forward his own amendment that would establish a deficit-neutral reserve fund relating to protecting Medicare and Medicaid. A Senate Democratic leadership aide was quick to counter, in a memo to reporters, that the proposal would in effect raise the age of Medicare eligibility and “carve out populations Republicans deem worthy and cut benefits for everyone else.”

Democrats also characterized the Senate Republican budget as a plot to bankroll tax breaks for the wealthiest Americans, and even their GOP counterparts wanted to talk about taxes. But the plan doesn’t set up tax cuts, with Senate Republicans arguing that should be tackled later in the year in separate legislation.

“While we aren’t considering tax policy as part of this reconciliation package, it’s important to set the record straight at what’s at stake in the upcoming tax debate,” Senate Finance Chair Mike Crapo (R-Idaho) said.

In some cases, Democrats were successful in getting Republicans to take the bait — to a point. Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine), for instance, backed Democrats in their attempts to allow floor votes on two amendments seeking to bar tax cuts for the wealthy in a final bill. Collins is a key target for Democrats in 2026, when she faces reelection.

While the budget measure GOP senators are working to adopt would lay the groundwork for a party-line package of energy policy, defense spending and border security investment, Trump is insistent on a more sweeping piece of legislation that also includes trillions of dollars in tax cuts. The House budget would lump all those priories together in what the president has called “one big, beautiful bill.”

Now the pressure is on House GOP leaders to show that they can rally enough support for that grander plan, which would require balancing the demands of fiscal conservatives with those of moderate Republicans unwilling to back deep cuts to safety net programs like Medicaid and SNAP food assistance.

Ultimately, Senate Republicans are bracing themselves for the distinct possibility they’ll have to do this all again in the not so distant future, if House Republicans are able to advance their own budget resolution next week that would achieve the more expansive bill Trump has explicitly endorsed.

But Republicans did have one diversion Thursday night: The intense USA v. Canada hockey game was playing on a television inside the GOP cloakroom.

Continue Reading

Trending