The Dictatorship
Trump and Musk want to re-hire people who keep U.S. nuclear weapons safe — if they can find them
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/43302/4330208ca6dede6284cbc8eb238736482e9233e8" alt="Trump and Musk want to re-hire people who keep U.S. nuclear weapons safe — if they can find them"
You may think we have too many nuclear weapons. Or you may think we don’t have enough. One thing you most certainly do not think, however, is that we should arbitrarily fire the people who keep these weapons safe and secure. But that is exactly what happened last week when the Trump administration suddenly fired 300 of the 1,800 people working at the National Nuclear Security Agency (NNSA) in Washington, D.C.
Emails went out at 3 p.m. on Thursday announcing immediate firings. Without warning, dozens of people were told to step away from their computers and physically escorted out of the building, their digital access to the agency blocked and all connections to their work wiped away.
Many of those fired are part of the management team overseeing tens of thousands of scientists, engineers and technicians who build, maintain and guard the U.S. arsenal of some 5,000 nuclear weapons.
All of the people fired were probationary employees, meaning they had worked in their jobs for only one to two years. This included some fresh out of graduate school, as well as experienced officials switching to new assignments. Since they have fewer rights than permanent employees, they were apparently seen by Elon Musk and his shadowy “Department of Government Efficiency” or DOGE, which conducted the mass firings, as easy targets in their effort to decimate the federal government workforce.
The firings were part of hundreds of termination notices sent to workers at the Department of Energy, the parent organization of the nuclear agency. It appears that DOGE made the decision based purely on their status, without knowing what the workers actually did.
Nnsa has”https://www.nytimes.com/2025/02/16/us/politics/trump-national-nuclear-security-administration-employees-firings.html?smid=url-share” target=”_blank”> two primary missions. Many of those fired are part of the management team overseeing tens of thousands of highly skilled scientists, engineers and technicians who build, maintain and guard the U.S. arsenal of some 5,000 nuclear weapons. Other fired officials work on NNSA’s other, equally vital mission of preventing the spread of nuclear weapons and materials.
These threat reduction programs began when the collapse of the Soviet Union triggered fears of “loose nukes” in the hands of terrorists and outlaw nations. The programs took on new urgency after the 9/11 attacks in 2001 raised the specter of nuclear terrorism. They include everything from radiation detectors that help prevent nuclear smuggling to export controls that block, for example, Iran from getting technologies it could use to build a nuclear bomb.
Outcries from experts, officials and members of Congress about the risks to national security forced Trump officials to reverse course. They announced last Friday that they now want to rehire the workers. The problem is that they don’t know how to reach them.
NBC News obtained a memo sent to NNSA employees that reads, in part: “The termination letters for some NNSA probationary employees are being rescinded, but we do not have a good way to get in touch with those personnel.” With the former employees locked out of their email accounts, Trump officials are now struggling to track down personal phone numbers. But even when reached, the workers are less than enthusiastic about returning.
“I will be honest, I intend to keep looking for work,” one employee told NBC News. “I will go back, but as soon as I find another role, I’ll be leaving.” Asked why she will still look for employment elsewhere, she said that she has “no faith I will keep my job.”
The chaos and confusion is likely to continue in the coming weeks. There are indications that Musk and President Donald Trump will soon issue sweeping Reduction in Force orders that could fire tens of thousands of federal workers, including those in vital nuclear security positions.
The chaos may be the point. Trump wants to demoralize the federal workforce, to weaken resistance to the executive orders pouring out of the Oval Office and pave the way for massive layoffs. “The organizing idea behind what they’re doing is that Trump wants to be king,” S. Chris van Hollen, D-MD., Said. “He doesn’t want to be accountable to the law, and the American people are getting hurt.”
Trump wants to demoralize the federal workforce, to weaken resistance to the executive orders pouring out of the Oval Office and pave the way for massive layoffs.
Chaos and nuclear weapons are not a good mix. There are certainly savings to be found in the massive nuclear weapons complex, still sized to support a Cold War-sized arsenal even though the current number of U.S. weapons is one-sixth the amount of the 1980s. However, abruptly firing employees without cause and without a coherent plan is a recipe for disaster, not savings.
Sen. Patty Murray, D-Wash., blasted the movecondemning the firing of nuclear workers and those in other vital government positions. “There is nothing ‘efficient’ about indiscriminately firing thousands upon thousands of workers in red and blue states whose work is badly needed,” she said. “Two billionaires who have zero concept of what the federal workforce does are breaking the American government — decimating essential services and leaving all of us worse off.”
NNSA requires a set of skills that are difficult to find. It takes years to train the managers, engineers and technicians involved in the nuclear programs. Treating them with contempt and calculated cruelty is not the way to retain their loyalty. Many could make much higher salaries in private companies but see their work on controlling nuclear weapons as a noble goal worth some personal sacrifice.
Senior officials in the previous administration warned of problems retaining this professional workforce because of the long hours and competition from the private sector. Instead of incentivizing their retention, Musk and Trump are discouraging current and future generations from government work. The loss of experience, talent and knowledge will cause enormous harm to U.S. national security that could take decades to repair.
The danger is not over. Although embarrassed officials had to walk back the immediate firings, it is not at all clear if the returning officials will report back to their same positions and responsibilities. Nor is there any indication that Musk’s agents understand the nature of the programs they are gutting. This may be particularly true of programs that fund nuclear security efforts abroad. Musk and Trump’s “America First” vision may well see funding border guards or nuclear safeguards in other nations as handouts to foreigners, particularly those programs operating in the Global South.
“They have no understanding as to why this is important,” one former NNSA official told me. “They will see trips to Indonesia for a nuclear security seminar as a vacation and not at all vital for U.S. national security. They will pick out a line item in a program and use it to mock the entire effort. ‘Why should we pay for African border guards?’ they’ll say. Their view is that we can just close U.S. borders and go it alone. But that is not possible if you truly want to stop the spread of materials that can be used in a nuclear or radiological bomb.”
Last week, Trump said“There’s no reason for us to be building brand new nuclear weapons, we already have so many.” There are plenty of programs he could cut to achieve that goal, including NNSA’s plan to build thousands of new “plutonium pits,” the cores of the new weapons Trump says we don’t need.
DOGE’s ham-fisted methods are no way to go about it. If Trump doesn’t want a nuclear 9/11 on his watch, he might want to pay a little more attention to the NNSA programs working to prevent it and call off Musk’s nuclear attack dogs.
The Dictatorship
The New York Yankees will now let players wear beards — it’s about time
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/00d52/00d528e18a9b586328c85e8a397a0bb553cae934" alt="The New York Yankees will now let players wear beards — it’s about time"
New York Yankees managing general partner Hal Steinbrenner announced Friday that the team’s players and personnel will henceforth be permitted to wear “well-groomed beards.” So ends a silly, archaic tradition that was made up by his father, George Steinbrennershortly after an ownership group he led bought the team in 1973.
The Yankees’ grooming regulations still prohibit long and unkempt hair, facial or otherwise. But as the younger Steinbrenner put it in a statement“It is the appropriate time to move beyond the familiar comfort of our former policy.”
A crucial aspect of the creation of this tradition is that ‘The Boss’ was never much of a baseball guy.
Facial hair has come and gone and come again over a century and a half of baseball, and by the mid-20th century, beards were mostly out of favor. Some teams even formalized their follicle prohibitions. But then came the cultural upheaval of the 1960s and beards and longer hair on men were au courant. By the 1970s, Oakland Athletics owner Charlie Finley was paying his players bonuses for growing mustaches. During the same period, the once-dominant Yankees were in the doldrums, but their young stars like Thurman Munson and Sparky Lyle sported beards and handlebar mustaches. Oscar Gamble had to cut his famously thick afro to play for the Yankees.
Steinbrenner’s arrival put an end to the fun. A crucial aspect of the creation of this tradition is that “The Boss” was never much of a baseball guy. He was a former assistant football coach at Northwestern and Purdue Universities and seemed to assume that the discipline of gridiron coaching applied to professional baseball. He clashed with Yankees manager Billy Martin over many things, but among the silliest was his insistence that Martin and his coaches ride the team bus with the players, simply because that was how it was done in college football.
Although some Yankee haters would derisively characterize them as Wall Street’s teamplenty of Yankees fans are proud to own that image, taking comfort in a buttoned-down, clean-cut, corporate sheen on their favorite ballplayers. But there are also a great many, myself included, who grew up not even realizing we were the white-collar conservatives of baseball.
I was a 1980s and ’90s kid who listened to Phil Rizzuto’s charming ramblings as he called games on Channel 11. We supported teams that typically offered little more than bad vibes and middling results. When lucky enough to trek to Yankee Stadium in the Bronx, we were generally surrounded by slovenly working-class loudmouths in the bleachers, not hedge fund clients only there for the luxury suite lobster and single malt scotch. It was a different time, when guys like Matt Nokes and Steve Balboni were some of the top-producing hitters. The coming Derek Jeter- and Mariano Rivera-led dynasty — and the ostentatious class warfare driven by booming revenues — wasn’t even a gleam in our eye.
A lot of us were not even aware of the Yankees’ grooming policy until 1991, when Steinbrenner ordered beloved first baseman and captain Don Mattingly to be benched and fined for refusing to trim his hair from a stylish-for-its-time mullet length. The humiliation of “Donnie Baseball” — the mild-mannered Indiana native and the only consistently great Yankees star during that miserable fallow period — was as public as it was absurd. The incident even inspired a classic “Simpsons” episode in which Mr. Burns kicked Mattingly off his team of softball ringers for having long sideburns, even after shaving both sides of his head. As the animated Mattingly walks off the field, he mutters“Still like him better than Steinbrenner.”
The Yankees are big on flaunting their “traditions” — with 22 retired numbers, an annual Old-Timers’ Dayand murals commemorating all 27 championship-winning teams around the stadium concourse. But unlike “no names on the back of the uniform” and Bob Sheppard — the stadium’s PA announcer for 56 years — the beard ban was always a contrived tradition, created by an owner imposing his own value system and decreeing it as “the Yankee way.”
Winning and money have a way of making guys forget how much they hate to shave.
While some players have said they’d be reluctant to sign with the Yankees because of the beard ban, they are professionals and money typically talks. Examples abound, but few are more prominent than outfielder Johnny Damonwho spent four successful years as a shaggy sex symbol with the Boston Red Sox, then signed a big free agent contract with the Yankees before the 2006 season, dutifully shaved his beard and cut his hair for four successful years as a “cleans up nicely” member of the Bronx Bombers.
Winning and money have a way of making guys forget how much they hate to shave. But because you can never please everybody, despite the widespread mockery the Yankees’ grooming policies have invited around MLB, news of the policy change left some non-Yankees players lamenting the loss of “tradition.”
I can only speak for myself, but as a dyed-in-the-wool pinstripes fan since birth, watching tightly coiffed, fresh-faced players has never meant a thing to me. I just want the team to win. And if evolving even slightly with the times makes it easier to sign young and increasingly independent-minded players, that’s a victory. Losing the corporate look is no great loss.
Anthony L. Fisher is a senior editor and writer for BLN Daily. He was previously the senior opinion editor for The Daily Beast and a politics columnist for Business Insider.
The Dictatorship
BREAKING: Trump abruptly fires Joint Chiefs Chairman, other top Pentagon leaders
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e9948/e99482b94a352cbdf7e78d108fa8b6bfcc3e4678" alt="BREAKING: Trump abruptly fires Joint Chiefs Chairman, other top Pentagon leaders"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f4042/f40422bcae241ca545c1c759cd56fb0e4cefaf50" alt=""
-
UP NEXT
Elon Musk is trying to ‘buy off’ my opponent, Wisconsin Supreme Court candidate says
07:22
-
‘Intimidation tactics’: MAGA prosecutor targets Dem rep who criticized Elon Musk
07:15
-
‘This is not a game’: Psaki calls out GOP lawmakers for flip-flopping on Russia
11:43
-
‘People are pissed. Not hard to see why’: Protests break out across the country against Trump, Musk
11:14
-
‘I take Musk’s tweets as a compliment’: Former Obama ethics czar on legal fight against Elon Musk
08:03
-
‘They want Eric Adams in a choke collar’: Weissmann on Trump’s leverage over NYC Mayor Adams
06:04
-
‘Outright extortion’: Rep. Goldman on NYC Mayor Adams’ joint Fox appearance with border czar Homan
11:58
-
‘Just a blatant lie’: Sen. Wyden blasts Musk’s claim of ‘read only’ DOGE access to sensitive data
05:56
-
‘Very, very illegal’: Former federal judge reacts to Trump attempts to defy judicial order
10:47
-
Jack Schlossberg: Why Dems Keep Losing the Internet | “The Blueprint with Jen Psaki”
44:12
-
‘Be careful what you sign’: Gov. Moore warns federal employees offered buyouts from DOGE
07:39
-
‘Constitutional crisis’: Sen. Booker reacts to possibility that Elon Musk defy court orders
12:21
-
‘Unprecedented’: Musk team given access to private data of government employees for political purge
07:35
-
Exclusive: Fired federal prosecutor speaks out for first time amid Trump’s purge of DOJ & FBI
09:37
-
‘A very dangerous moment’: Raskin sounds alarm on Trump’s ‘mass purge’ of government officials
07:48
-
‘He was clueless’: Sen. Hassan blasts RFK Jr.’s testimony during confirmation hearing
12:02
-
‘A betrayal of the American people’: Sen. Warren blasts Trump over failure to address food prices
10:08
-
‘Wild goose chase’: Jan. 6 prosecutor who just resigned slams ‘review’ of Jan. 6 prosecutions
07:02
-
‘Everything that’s happening continues to normalize violence’: Gov. Whitmer condemns Trump pardons
12:32
-
‘A nakedly illegal action’: Obama Ethics Czar Norm Eisen blasts Trump inspectors general firing
05:57
-
UP NEXT
Elon Musk is trying to ‘buy off’ my opponent, Wisconsin Supreme Court candidate says
07:22
-
‘Intimidation tactics’: MAGA prosecutor targets Dem rep who criticized Elon Musk
07:15
-
‘This is not a game’: Psaki calls out GOP lawmakers for flip-flopping on Russia
11:43
-
‘People are pissed. Not hard to see why’: Protests break out across the country against Trump, Musk
11:14
-
‘I take Musk’s tweets as a compliment’: Former Obama ethics czar on legal fight against Elon Musk
08:03
-
‘They want Eric Adams in a choke collar’: Weissmann on Trump’s leverage over NYC Mayor Adams
06:04
The Dictatorship
HowSteve Bannon is carnivalizing Nazism
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ae7b8/ae7b872c6f99e502047ae437b88659973ef20b33" alt="HowSteve Bannon is carnivalizing Nazism"
At the end of his speech at the Conservative Political Action Conference on Thursday evening, MAGA activist Steve Bannon shouted “Fight! Fight! Fight!” and straightened his right arm swiftly, holding it at an elevated, roughly 45-degree angle, and then quickly pulled it back down again. After his arm returned to his side, he yelled “Amen.” Any person with the faintest knowledge of Western history would recognize the gesture as a Nazi salute.
Bannon has denied it was supposed to be a Nazi salute. In an interview with NBC News at the conference Thursday, Bannon said“I do that all the time. I wave to my crowd, because it’s all about them.” But if you watch the videono reasonable person would describe the gesture as a wave.
Bannon lacks the plausible deniability about accidental gestures that Musk had at his disposal.
Some media outlets suggested Bannon’s gesture mimicked that of megabillionaire Elon Muskwho carried out what many say resembled a Nazi salute at an inauguration event for President Donald Trump in January. Musk’s gesture triggered a debate about his true intentions. After the forceful extension of his arm — executed with an audible grunt — he did it once more and then said, “My heart goes out to you,” leading some people to believe that it may have been an unintentionally unfortunate-looking attempt to engage the crowd. Musk later deemed the accusations as “dirty tricks” in a post on X. But notably, he also made several Nazi-related puns on his social media platform, leaving some to wonder if perhaps he meant to provoke a polarizing response. “When I see the troll emoji, it’s like looking in the mirror,” he wrote a few days later.
Bannon lacks the plausible deniability about accidental gestures that Musk had at his disposal. Bannon, an influential podcast host and the former chief strategist for Trump during his first term, is a savvy communicator and extremely plugged in to the news cycle. It is safe to assume he knows about what Musk did, which is why some media outlets described Bannon as imitating him. That this happened after Musk’s gesture was widely criticized by many as a Nazi salute feeds the theory that it was a conscious provocation. Moreover, Bannon made no comment akin to “My heart goes out to you” as Musk did, which might have confounded efforts to pin down Bannon’s meaning.
Jordan Bardella, the leader of France’s far-right National Rally party, canceled his appearance at CPAC after Bannon’s speech, citing his condemnation of a speaker who “as a provocation” made “a gesture referring to Nazi ideology.” Bannon told the French newspaper Le Point“If he canceled [the speech] over what the mainstream media said about the speech, he didn’t listen to the speech. … He’s a boy, not a man.” The Holocaust-denying white supremacist Nick Fuentes said in response to the speech: “It was a straight-up Roman salute. It’s getting a little uncomfortable even for me.”
So what is Bannon doing? His gesture serves as a signaling device to attract the most noxious, militant and overtly fascistic elements of the American far right to support the president. In his speech, Bannon addressed his audience as “the tip of the tip of the spear of the populist nationalist movement,” celebrated the release of Jan. 6 prisoners and said, “We want Trump in ’28.” Put it all together and Bannon is inviting extremists to mobilize on behalf of Trump’s authoritarian project on a level previously unseen.
Even if we were to understand Bannon’s gesture as “trolling,” it is still an insidious strategy that carnivalizes Nazism. Even as a winking reference to Musk’s odd, disturbing gesture (whose darkest implications Musk refused to fully repudiate), it still radiates an ease and playfulness toward Nazi iconography. Why choose this specific gesture, a clear reference to the most universally acknowledged symbol of Nazism other than the swastika, as a “joke” to “troll the media” or “own the libs”? It still has the effect of making fascism and white supremacy look less ominous and less taboo, and maybe for some on the right, a little more intriguing than before.
Even as a “joke,” it acts as a path to mainstreaming some of the most heinous ideas that humanity has ever conceived of. It chips away at the cultural and political guardrails our society has developed against autocracy, vigilante racial domination, hatred of “the other.” And this all comes as Trump develops closer ties with Germany’s far-right party, Alternative for Germany, some of whose members have used Nazi slogans.
Bannon’s gesture doesn’t mean he is a Nazi nor does it signify a wholesale defense of Nazi ideals. But it does mean he is willing to play around with the aura and symbology of Nazism to achieve his political goals. At any level of interpretation, Bannon’s gesture is abhorrent, and it speaks volumes about his political movement if he retains power within it.
Zeeshan Aleem is a writer and editor for BLN Daily. Previously, he worked at Vox, HuffPost and Blue Light News, and he has also been published in, among other places, The New York Times, The Atlantic, The Nation, and The Intercept. You can sign up for his free politics newsletter here.
-
The Josh Fourrier Show3 months ago
DOOMSDAY: Trump won, now what?
-
Economy3 months ago
Fed moves to protect weakening job market with bold rate cut
-
Economy3 months ago
It’s still the economy: What TV ads tell us about each campaign’s closing message
-
Politics3 months ago
How Republicans could foil Harris’ Supreme Court plans if she’s elected
-
Politics2 months ago
Trump’s pick to lead USDA hasn’t returned Vilsack’s call
-
Uncategorized3 months ago
Senate Dems balk at Johnson’s spending bill, but wait to release their own plan
-
Economy3 months ago
Harris dismisses Trump as ‘not serious’ on the economy in BLN interview
-
Politics3 months ago
RFK Jr.’s bid to take himself off swing state ballots may scramble mail-in voting