Connect with us

The Dictatorship

The Biden-Trump White House meeting was more than just a photo-op

Published

on

The Biden-Trump White House meeting was more than just a photo-op

For years, President Joe Biden has emphasized that the peaceful transfer of power is imperative to preserving American democracy. This Wednesday, he had a chance to show what he meant, hosting President-elect Donald Trump at the White House.

It was a stark contrast to four years earlier. On the same date in 2020, Trump was still refusing to concede the electioneven though the race had been called for a week, opting instead to spread conspiracy theories that culminated in a deadly attack on the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6.

Biden has spent the last four years warning about the danger to democracy that Trump posed, including two years in which the two men bitterly campaigned against each other directly. Trump, for his part, had baselessly called Biden “the destroyer of American democracy.”

The two sat side by side in front of a roaring fireplace in the White House as they answered questions from reporters.

Still, the two sat side by side in front of a roaring fireplace in the White House as they answered questions from reporters. Trump later commended Biden to the New York Post. “It’s going very smoothly,” he told the outlet on Thursday, emphasizing his “very, very good relationship” with the Biden White House.

It was more than just a photo-op, too. The Biden administration is also working with Trump’s transition team in a vital bureaucratic process to begin the handover of the machinery of the federal government. The day after the 2024 election, the General Services Administration issued a statement acknowledging Trump’s victory, saying the agency is “prepared to work with President-elect Trump’s transition team to complete the required agreement to receive GSA administrative services and support.”

This, too, was a contrast. Trump’s refusal to concede in 2020 extended to even these behind-the-scenes efforts, as Trump appointee Emily Murphy of the General Services Administration delayed the department’s acknowledgment of Biden’s victory. Not only did these actions further legitimize Trump’s bogus denial of his election loss, but they also stalled mundane but vital obligations designed to keep the executive branch operating uninterrupted — tasks like assigning email addresses and office space, allocating salaries and more.

Another moment of contrast is coming that will be even more significant. In 52 days, on Jan. 6, Vice President Kamala Harris will perform her duties when presiding over the U.S. Senate to count electoral votes and certify her own election loss. She will do so standing in the same spot that pro-Trump extremists overran, threatening to hang her predecessor for doing what every vice president before him had done.

It’s a sacred duty that Vice President-elect JD Vance said he wouldn’t have performed in 2020.

It’s a sacred duty that Vice President-elect JD Vance said he wouldn’t have performed in 2020 if he had been in that position.

In all of these actions, Biden and Harris are leading by example. These moments show their commitment to democracy goes deeper than their own political ambitions and demonstrate the importance of the very norms that Trump has sought to trample. It will be a brief respite, though, a swan song for Biden’s time as president, the last gasp of normalcy in the executive branch and the calm before the storm of a second Trump term.

For more thought-provoking insights from Michael Steele, Alicia Menendez and Symone Sanders-Townsend, watch“The Weekend”every Saturday and Sunday at 8 a.m. ET on BLN.

Alicia Menendez

Alicia Menendez is a co-host of “The Weekend,” which airs Saturdays and Sundays at 8 a.m. ET on BLN. She is also the host of the “Latina to Latina” podcast and the author of “The Likeability Trap: How to Break Free and Succeed As You Are.”

Evan Brechtel

Evan Brechtel is a segment producer on BLN’s “The Weekend.”

Read More

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Dictatorship

Joe Scarborough slams GOP for ‘screwing their own constituents’ to protect ICE

Published

on

Joe Scarborough slams GOP for ‘screwing their own constituents’ to protect ICE

Joe Scarborough slammed Republicans on Thursday’s “Morning Joe” for their repeated refusal to partner with Democrats to reopen some parts of the Department of Homeland Securityas the showdown in Washington, D.C., over federal immigration enforcement continues.

“Sometimes things are complicated and confusing,” Scarborough said. “This is not confusing.”

As he explained, Democrats are currently pushing legislation to partially fund some agencies inside DHS, including the Transportation Security Administration and the Federal Emergency Management Agencyor FEMA. However, in order to pass those bills, Democrats, as the minority party, need Republicans to join in on the effort.

“If everybody agrees on something, they can pass it with unanimous consent. So Democrats keep going to the Senate floor,” Scarborough said, and “Republicans stand up and say no.”

A majority of the department’s funding has been withheld since the shutdown began on Feb. 14, when Democrats demanded a major overhaul of the agency carrying out President Donald Trump’s mass deportation effort.

Last week, more than 100,000 DHS workers missed their first full paycheck. Despite not being paid, many of those workers are considered essential employees and therefore are required to work during the shutdown.

“Republicans keep killing these opportunities to pay these people for the work they’re doing to keep us safe, in the air, on the seas,” Scarborough said. “All of this is to allow ICE to continue being the out-of-control, reckless agency that it was under Kristi Noem.”

Scarborough said he couldn’t understand “why Republicans are screwing their own constituents every single day: businesspeople that have to fly, families that have to get home to see their mothers or their fathers or the grandmothers or the grandfathers, parents that need to get to the kids to help with a child that may be sick.”

“I mean, why are Republicans doing this?” he asked. “Why aren’t they stopping this? Why is ICE so important to them that they are screwing their own constituents to protect guys in masks?”

You can watch Scarborough’s analysis in the clip at the top of the page.

Allison Detzel is an editor/producer for MS NOW. She was previously a segment producer for “AYMAN” and “The Mehdi Hasan Show.”

Read More

Continue Reading

The Dictatorship

The years I spent defending César Chávez make me feel like a fool

Published

on

The years I spent defending César Chávez make me feel like a fool

Dolores Huerta and I shared the stage in November at a Chicago event honoring Latino leaders and journalists from the United States. What I remember most about that day was seeing the ballroom of mostly Latina women lining up to thank the co-founder of United Farm Workers and get her thoughts on how to respond to the way our communities have been targeted.

ICE was continuing its raids in Chicago, but here was Huerta, 95 years old, buoying us all.

I remember the servers, too, some of whom stopped after the event to take photos with Huerta and share that their local union uses the same labor-organizing tactics she did with the UFW. Immigration and Customs Enforcement was continuing its raids in Chicago, but here was Huerta, 95 years old, buoying us all. Here was our elder, imploring us to never give up, to keep organizing and fighting. If possible. Not as a slogan, but as something living and breathing in that room.

The New York Times on Wednesday published a multiyear investigation into allegations of sexual abuse of minors and rape against the other co-founder of the UFW: César Chávez. In part because I grew up with such a deep admiration of Chávez, reading Ana Murguia and Debra Rojas, both 66 years old, describe the pain they said Chávez inflicted upon them stopped me cold.

Then Huerta revealed that she had two unwelcome encounters with Chávez, one of which she described as rape. The two encounters, she said, resulted in two babies, whom she gave away to others to raise.

A black and white, archival photo showing Dolores Huerta, left, and Cesar Chavez — as well as other people — holding photos of the conditions that farmworkers endure in San Joaquin Valley farm labor camps.
United Farm Workers leaders Dolores Huerta, left, and Cesar Chavez at a news conference outside a U.S. District Court on Nov. 21, 1989, in Fresno, Calif. Richard Darby / Fresno Bee file / Tribune News Service via Getty Images

“I carried this secret for as long as I did,” she wrote, “because building the movement and securing farmworker rights was my life’s work.”

I sat with that for a long time.

In the 1970s, when I was a young boy who had just moved from Puerto Rico to the Bronx, Chávez was one of the first brown faces I saw on television. Few Latino men seemed to be fighting for something on television, but he was. I will forever argue that U.S. Latinos are not a monolith, but at a time when this country painted us as one, Chávez felt like our sole political leader.

“He represented the best of us — and by us, I mean Latino America,” said Manny Fernandez, the Times’ California editor and co-writer of Wednesday’s bombshell of a story. “And to discover that Chavez had this dark side is disturbing. But we do need to know who our heroes are.”

Chávez eventually reached the pinnacle of being the most famous Latino in the U.S. He passed away in 1993 and was posthumously awarded the Medal of Honor by former President Bill Clinton in 1994, and his bust graced the Biden Oval Office. His quotes about community and the fight for social justice were part of the U.S. Latino lexicon. And the Times story about him being a predator and Huerta’s confirmation of it have sent shockwaves throughout the community.

To discover that Chavez had this dark side is disturbing. But we do need to know who our heroes are.

the new york times’ manny fernandez

Those of us who have studied his life in detail already know he was incredibly complicated. Biographers have documented his extramarital affairs, his authoritarian leadership and purges of his staff. Chávez once thought of undocumented workers as union scabs, a fact that right-wingers love to cite. But nothing prepared me for what Murguia, Rojas and Huerta revealed. They did not describe a complicated man. They described a rapist — a rapist of minors.

Ace Gustavo Arellano”https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2026-03-18/cesar-chavez-myth-abuse-allegations”>wrote in his column for the Los Angeles Times: “Much of the Latino civil rights, political and educational ecosystem will have to grapple with why they held up Chávez as a paragon of virtue for too long above others just as deserving and, as it turns out, nowhere near as compromised. In any event, the myth has been punctured.”

Chávez’s complexity was something I explored in the past and at times, defended. Regarding his immigration views, in 2021, I finally found a 1974 letter proving that he shifted his position and was not the anti-immigrant hard-liner the right tried to make him. I spent years making sure that history was accurate. And even though I was defending his views on immigration, and not defending him against allegations of rape, reading the three women’s accounts Wednesday still left me feeling like a fool.

Dolores Huerta, left, and Julio Ricardo Varela smiling for a picture.
Dolores Huerta, left, and Julio Ricardo Varela at the ¡BRAVO! National Awards Gala on Nov. 13, 2025, in Chicago. Courtesy Julio Ricardo Varela

The Chávez family released a statement that said, in part: “Our family is shocked and saddened to learn of news that our father, Cesar Chavez, engaged in sexual impropriety with women and minors nearly 50 years ago. As a family steeped in the values of equity and justice, we honor the voices of those who feel unheard and who report sexual abuse. This is deeply painful to our family.”

After an acknowledgement that his family has its own good memories of him, the statement said, “We hope these matters are approached thoughtfully and fairly.”

Chávez’s name adorns an untold number of streets, schools and parks in this country. His name should be removed from all of those places: every one.

“Everything should be named for the martyrs of the farm workers movement,” Huerta told Latino USA. “Every name should be named after them.”

By Thursday, California had already begun the process of changing César Chávez Day, March 31, to Farmworkers Day.

In that same Latino USA interview, Huerta said it was the courage of women such as Murguia and Rojas who gave her the courage to speak out now.

I used to see Chávez as a hero, but now I realize that our greatest heroes are the ones who speak out even if it means revealing their own pain. What Huerta did was brave, and it is no surprise that she has received an outpouring of love and support. She did not have to say a word. She could have kept her silence, and she would still be loved and admired. Instead, at 95 years old, she chose truth over mythology. That’s the most radical act of love for a community there is.

Julio Ricardo Varela is the founder of “The Latino Newsletter” and co-editor of “Pressing Issues from Free Press.”

Read More

Continue Reading

The Dictatorship

Fired FBI agents claim ‘improper acts of political retribution’ by Trump administration

Published

on

Fired FBI agents claim ‘improper acts of political retribution’ by Trump administration

Former FBI agents allege they were illegally fired for having worked on an investigation that led to President Donald Trump’s indictment in the 2020 election interference case.

In a new lawsuit filed Thursday in Washington, two ex-agents said their constitutional rights were violated by “improper acts of political retribution.”

The civil suitbrought by plaintiffs proceeding under pseudonyms (John Does 1 and 2), names FBI Director Kash Patel, Attorney General Pam Bondi, the FBI and the Justice Department as defendants.

It’s the latest legal responseto the second Trump administration’s revenge campaign, which has included firing people who did their jobs probing potential crimes that happened to include the actions of the once and future president.

“Based merely on Plaintiffs’ involvement in an investigation implicating then-former President Trump initiated during the Biden Administration, Defendant Kash Patel, Defendant Pamela J. Bondi, and elected officials with whom they acted in concert perceived Plaintiffs to be politically disloyal to President Trump and therefore targeted Plaintiffs for removal,” the former agents alleged in their complaint.

They said their firings were illegal because they were based on the perception that they weren’t Trump supporters.

They’re seeking a court declaration that their rights were violated, as well as immediate reinstatement with protection from further action against them without due process. They said they were fired without evidence, notice or the opportunity for a hearing.

The government defendants will have an opportunity to respond in court.

The election interference case was one of two federal prosecutions brought against Trump. The DOJ stopped pursuing both cases after his 2024 election win, due to the department’s policy against prosecuting sitting presidents.

Jordan Rubin is the Deadline: Legal Blog writer. He was a prosecutor for the New York County District Attorney’s Office in Manhattan and is the author of “Bizarro,” a book about the secret war on synthetic drugs. Before he joined MS NOW, he was a legal reporter for Bloomberg Law.

Read More

Continue Reading

Trending