Connect with us

Congress

Stefanik eyed for top Trump administration post

Published

on

One of President-elect Donald Trump’s most vocal supporters in the House is on the short list to become his next ambassador to the United Nations, according to five people familiar with the potential appointment.

Elise Stefanik (R-N.Y.) tops the list of people the Trump transition team is considering for the influential diplomatic post.

Stefanik has repeatedly attacked the United Nations over accusations that the world body is antisemitic. Last month she called for a “complete reassessment of U.S. funding of the United Nations” in response to efforts by the Palestinian Authority to expel Israel from the United Nations as war rages in the Middle East.

On the domestic front, Stefanik has emerged as one of Trump’s most outspoken supporters. She gained national prominence during Trump’s first impeachment trial in 2019 with fiery defenses of the former president, and refused to certify the 2020 election results after the Jan. 6 insurrection, backing Trump’s false claims of a stolen election.

Stefanik this year drew praise from Republicans and Jewish leaders after she grilled college presidents in a House hearing on their handling of campus demonstrations over the Israel-Gaza war.

Her questioning over whether calling for the genocide of Jewish students considered bullying — and subsequent equivocations from the higher education leaders — led to the resignations of the Harvard and University of Pennsylvania presidents.

Stefanik and the Trump transition team did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

At the United Nations, international diplomats are bracing for a drastically more combative U.S. administration when Trump takes office. Four foreign diplomats working on U.N. issues — all granted anonymity to freely discuss a sensitive matter — say they expect Trump to steeply cut funding to U.N. programs and withdraw from the World Health Organization and U.N. Global Compact on Migration.

Whomever Trump picks as ambassador, would be the standard-bearer of this more hostile approach.

The role is seen as a stepping stone in American politics, underscoring Stefanik’s reputation as a rising star in the Trump-era GOP. Past U.S. envoys to the United Nations have become secretary of State (Madeleine Albright), national security adviser (John Bolton) and even U.S. president (George H.W. Bush.) Trump’s former U.N. Ambassador Nikki Haley ran unsuccessfully for president in the 2024 primary cycle before dropping out to endorse Trump.

Tapping Stefanik for a top administration job would trigger a special election in her New York district, which poses a risk if Republicans have a narrow one- to two-seat majority in the House, control over which is still up for grabs. Still, the seat is in a region that has not elected a Democrat to the House in a decade.

Eric Bazail-Eimil and Jack Detsch contributed to this report.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Congress

Rep. Dusty Johnson to announce a bid for South Dakota governor Monday

Published

on

Rep. Dusty Johnson will announce a bid for South Dakota governor Monday, according to two people granted anonymity to speak about private conversations.

Johnson has served as South Dakota’s sole House representative since 2019. He’s been a key player in major deals on Capitol Hill in recent years as the head of the Main Street Caucus of Republicans.

Johnson, long expected to mount a bid for higher office, will make the announcement in Sioux Falls.

Johnson is the eighth House Republican to announce a run for higher office in 2026. Reps. Andy Biggs of Arizona, Byron Donalds of Florida, Randy Feenstra of Iowa, John James of Michigan and John Rose of Tennessee are also seeking governor’s offices; Reps. Andy Barr of Kentucky and Buddy Carter of Georgia have announced Senate runs.

Continue Reading

Congress

Senate slated to take first vote on megabill Saturday

Published

on

Senate Republicans are planning to take an initial vote at noon on Saturday to take up the megabill.

Leadership laid out the timeline during a closed-door lunch on Friday, Sen. John Kennedy (R-La.) and John Hoeven (R-N.D.) said after the lunch. A person granted anonymity to discuss internal scheduling confirmed the noon timeline but cautioned Republicans haven’t locked in the schedule yet.

During the lunch, Speaker Mike Johnson pitched Senate Republicans on the tentative SALT deal, according to three people in the room. He said the deal was as good as Republican can get, according to the people.

Johnson noted he still has “one holdout” — an apparent reference to New York Republican Nick LaLota, who said in a brief interview Friday that if there was a deal, he was not part of it.

Leaving the meeting, Johnson was asked by reporters whether he thought Senate Republicans would accept the SALT deal. “I believe they will,” he replied. “They’re going to digest the final calculations, but I think we’re very, very close to closing that issue.”

In the meeting, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Johnson laid out details of the fragile agreement, telling Senate Republicans the House SALT deal would be cut in half, to total roughly $192 billion. They restated it would raise the SALT cap to $40,000 for five years under the current House-negotiated SALT deal, and snap back to the current $10,000 cap after that.

In related matters, Kennedy and Hoeven also said the Senate will keep its provider tax proposal but delay its implementation, which Republicans believe will help it comply with budget rules. and Johnson also told Senate Republicans that he wants to do another reconciliation bill — which senators took to mean they would get another opportunity to secure spending cuts or provisions passed that have been squeezed out of the megabill.

Continue Reading

Congress

Trump says July 4 is “not the end all”

Published

on

President Donald Trump on Friday backed off the July 4 deadline he set for Congress to pass his megabill, acknowledging that the timing could slip as Republicans work through a series of political and logistical hurdles.

“It’s not the end all,” Trump said of the self-imposed Independence Day goal. “It can go longer, but we’d like to get it done by that time if possible.”

The remarks represented a clear softening of the White House’s position from just a day earlier, when Trump administration officials insisted that the GOP lawmakers pass the domestic policy package within a week despite a series of fresh obstacles.

Senate Republican leaders are still struggling to lock down the necessary 51 votes for the bill, amid objections from competing factions over the depth of the legislation’s Medicaid cuts.

The effort has also been hamstrung by a flurry of adverse rulings by the Senate parliamentarian that are now forcing lawmakers to rewrite significant portions of the bill.

The president indicated that he has little interest as of now in trying to directly overrule or even fire the parliamentarian — a step that some close allies in Congress had called for after she disqualified several of the bill’s provisions.

“The parliamentarian’s been a little difficult,” Trump said. “I disagree with the parliamentarian on some things, and on other ways she’s been fine.”

White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt downplayed those issues on Thursday, saying Trump still expected Republicans to coalesce in the coming days and put the bill on his desk by July 4.

But asked directly on Friday, Trump took a more ambivalent stance.

“We have a lot of committed people and they feel strongly about a subject, subjects that you’re not even thinking about that are important to Republicans,” he said, appearing to reference the policy divisions within the Senate GOP conference.

Trump also singled out Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) for praise despite his resistance to the bill, complaining instead about the lack of Democratic votes.

“The problem we have is it’s a great bill, it’s a popular bill,” Trump said. “But we’ll get no Democrats.”

If all Republicans vote for the bill, it would not need Democrats’ support to pass.

Continue Reading

Trending