The Dictatorship
Overshadowing the Final Four was Trump’s threat to hamstring college athletes
Because he’s apparently not fully occupied with the war he started that’s shaken up the world, President Donald Trump signed an executive order concerning college sports Friday that reveals yet another megalomaniacal fantasy. Just as the Final Four, the culmination of college basketball’s billion-dollar tournament, was about to tip off, Trump demanded a return to yesteryear: When players didn’t get paid. When, unlike every other college student, they couldn’t move from one school to another without penalty. When disproportionately Black basketball and football teams had to do whatever the white men ruling the roost decreed.
Trump signed an executive order concerning college sports Friday that reveals yet another megalomaniacal fantasy.
The president’s executive order says it’s intended “to bolster the effectiveness of key college-sports rules on transferring, eligibility, and pay-for-play by evaluating whether violations of such rules render a university unfit for Federal grants and contracts … establishing clear, consistent, and fair eligibility limits, including a five-year participation window … banning improper financial arrangements including pay-for-play …”
But it’s more properly seen as an attempt to put Black athletes in their place.
The University of Michigan Wolverines, who won the national college basketball championship Monday night, and the University of Connecticut Huskies they defeated will, for the first time evershare in the millions of dollars they reaped for the NCAA’s Final Four. But if Trump’s retrograde executive order were the rule, they couldn’t.
The Wolverines would have just gotten a commemorative ring, a grab bag, a ball cap, a T-shirt and an “attaboy” pat on the back. That’s what the winners of the tournament got for decades.
Ten of the 16 players on Michigan’s championship-winning squad, including four of the five starters, are Black. The Huskies team they defeated is predominantly Black too. The demographics of basketball and football, college athletics’ only profitable sports, have for decades colored the country’s perception of what those athletes deserve and how they should be treated.
As Christian Collins, a Center for Law and Social Policy analyst in Washington, wrote three years ago about the racial economics of college sports: “From 2005 to 2019, Black college athletes across men’s and women’s basketball and men’s football in the largest five athletic conferences are projected to have lost between $17 [billion] and $21 billion in compensatory theft, or roughly $250,000 per athlete per year, if revenue sharing in collegiate athletics modeled that of professional sports leagues. College athletic programs are often complicit in the economic exploitation of underrepresented student populations.”
Similarly, academics Ellen Staurowsky and Joel Maxcy, when both were at Drexel University, fought for fair treatment of college athletes, and those athletes have gotten some liberation in the form of the protection of their athletic scholarships. Most famously, they have won the right to cash in on their own athletic celebrity, as their own schools had been doing, by getting paid for the use of their name, image and likeness.
And just this season, after another legal victory, college athletes won a share of the billions of dollars they produce that can make their coaches, athletic directors and college sports commissioners millionaires several times over. Those billions also finance women’s college sports and sports young Black men largely don’t play, such as golf (this president’s favorite), tennis, lacrosse and ice hockey.
At a symposium we participated in at Vanderbilt University in February, Duke University anthropologist Tracie Canada, author of “Tackling the Everyday: Race and Nation in Big-Time College Football,” said, “I see small movements that athletes are making, small changes of looking at the ways that athletes are speaking out about how they are identified.” She continued: “‘Am I a worker? Am I an athlete? Am I a student? How am I positioned at this university?’ Making decisions for themselves that might not benefit the institution, might not benefit their team, but they might benefit them individually as athletes who have to make decisions for themselves, because they are the ones who are going to be injured. They are the ones who are potentially going to make money from this.”
But to Trump, that more equitable treatment that the predominantly Black college athletic laborers have won is evidence of societal erosion, not progress. Indeed, his executive order was called for in that road map to hell, officially known as Project 2025, the 887-page reactionary proposal from the Heritage Foundation that is now being enacted as policy in Trump’s second term. Project 2025 called for the immediate replacement of the National Labor Relations Board because its members declared that college athletes who toil on football fields and basketball courts should be viewed as employees and afforded the common benefits of laborers: pay, protections and the right to unionize.
I see small movements that athletes are making about how they are identified. ‘Am I a worker? Am I an athlete? Am I a student? How am I positioned at this university?’”
tracie canada, author of “tackling the everyday: race and nation in big-time college football”
Last month, Trump invited to the White House about 50 people in college sports he found of like mindwho wanted to lasso 21st century college athletes as if they had run away from the plantation. There were NCAA President Charlie Baker, major college athletic conference commissioners including Southeastern Conference boss Greg Sankey, and University of Alabama football coaching legend Nick Saban.
Trump invited everyone except the liberated athletes, the ones with the most at stake. Not unlike the way he is rampaging around the world, from Venezuela to Iran, without an iota of consideration for those in his wake.
Trump’s order isn’t about saving college sports. It does, however, savage the athletes who play them.
Kevin B. Blackistone is a longtime national sports columnist and professor of the practice at the Philip Merrill College of Journalism at the University of Maryland.
The Dictatorship
Trump’s budget seeks money for Kash Patel’s FBI to spy on Americans
Happy Tuesday. Here’s your Tuesday Tech Drop, the past week’s top stories from the intersection of technology and politics.
Trump seeks funds to snoop on liberals
Rep. Mary Gay Scanlon, D-Pa., sounded the alarm on Monday over the Trump administration’s latest budget proposal, particularly its requests for “counterterrorism” funds to be used to target Americans. Scanlon flagged recent reporting from journalist Ken Klippenstein that highlighted the White House’s request for a “joint mission center” that would “proactively” target Americans deemed a terrorist threat due to opinions such as anti-Christian sentiment, “anti-Americanism” and “anti-capitalism.” Those definitions came from a national security memo the Trump administration issued last yearknown as NSPM-7.
The proposed budget references social media platforms as hotspots for the so-called terrorism the administration is “proactively” trying to target.
“We’ve been raising the alarm about Trump’s counterterrorism directive – NSPM-7 – a plan to label Americans as domestic terrorists over opposition to immigration enforcement, beliefs about capitalism, and positions on race, gender, and religion,” Scanlon wrote on X. “Now, the White House wants to use taxpayer dollars to spy on those who oppose its extremist agenda.”
We’ve been raising the alarm about Trump’s counterterrorism directive – NSPM-7 – a plan to label Americans as domestic terrorists over opposition to immigration enforcement, beliefs about capitalism, and positions on race, gender, and religion.
Now, the White House wants to use… https://t.co/HKQIzHZCKI
— Congresswoman Mary Gay Scanlon (@RepMGS) April 7, 2026
DOJ privacy official quits Civil Rights Division
Kilian Kagle, a privacy official with the Civil Rights Division, which oversees voting rights at the Justice Department, resigned last week as the Trump administration works to compel states to hand over sensitive voter information. Kagle did not give a reason for his departure.
Read my blog on Kagle’s resignation here.
Propagandists join Trump’s Easter party
The founders of Tenet Media, a right-wing organization paid by Russian interests to launder pro-Russian talking points to Americans in an illegal scheme, apparently attended the White House Easter celebration on Monday.
The founders of illegal Russian media operation Tenet Media weren’t just allowed back in the country. They’re invited to the White House Easter egg roll! https://t.co/sEoiwMcZmY
— Will Sommer (@willsommer) April 6, 2026
Trump’s wasteful war enriches defense industry
The Pentagon is seeking $4.5 billion dollars to replenish its stockpile of Tomahawk missiles, which Trump has depleted over the course of his deadly and economically destructive war with Iran. During a recent episode of “All In with Chris Hayes,” Sen. Chris Murphy, D-Conn., discussed how Trump’s reckless use of extremely expensive military weapons will likely benefit defense contractors that have agreed to fund the president’s legally dubious new ballroom at the White House.

Read more about the White House’s request at Bloomberg here.
Reporting for the record
A new report in the Gateway Journalism Review highlights how data journalists have helped establish a public record of the devastating effects of Trump’s racist, anti-immigrant crackdown.
Read more at the Gateway Journalism Review here.
TMZ targets vacationing lawmakers
Digital tabloid TMZ has had a field day outing lawmakers who have gone on vacation during the government shutdown of the Department of Homeland Security. One of those lawmakers, Rep. John James, R-Mich., has been facing mockery after he posted an old video of himself at a gun range, apparently in an effort to raise doubts about whether he went to Turks and Caicos during the shutdown.
Feast your eyes on the evidence:
Read more at the Daily Beast here.
After a bunch of conservative lawmakers posted artificial intelligence-generated images that purported to show the colonel who was rescued after his plane was shot down over Iran, the Daily Kos’ Alix Breeden wrote about the crisis of Republicans “getting tricked by AI slop.”
Read the post on Daily Kos here.
Holocaust Memorial pulls links
Blue Light News reported this week on alterations made last year to references to racism on the U.S. National Holocaust Memorial website, removing a page called “Teaching Materials on Nazism and Jim Crow,” which, according to the outlet, “Provided lesson plans and resources about the connections between Americande jureracism and the Nazi regime, including links to sites about ‘African American Soldiers during World War II’ and ‘Afro-Germans during the Holocaust.’” A spokesperson for the museum told Blue Light News, “The Trump administration has not requested any changes to the Museum’s content or programming,” pointing them to other, still-active pages that touch on related topics.
Read the Blue Light News report here.
Ja’han Jones is an MS NOW opinion blogger. He previously wrote The ReidOut Blog.
The Dictatorship
Tuesday’s Mini-Report, 4.7.26
Today’s edition of quick hits.
* Kharg Island: “The U.S. conducted strikes early this morning on military targets on Kharg Island, Iran’s main hub for oil exports, according to a U.S. official with direct knowledge of the incident. ‘This was not an oil infrastructure strike,’ the official stressed, describing the attack as ‘restrikes’ on what the U.S. had previously hit. The Wall Street Journal was the first to report the strikes.”
* A joint statement from House Democrats: “House Democratic leadership demanded Congress come back in session to ‘vote to end this reckless war of choice in the Middle East before Donald Trump plunges our country into World War III,’ according to a joint statement issued by House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., and Democratic Whip Katherine Clark, D-Mass., among others. The leaders called Trump ‘completely unhinged’ and said his latest statement, issued Tuesday morning, ‘shocks the conscience and requires a decisive congressional response.’”
* A similar joint statement from Senate Democrats: “‘We speak today with one voice and one purpose: to condemn President Trump’s threat to extinguish an entire civilization,’ said the statement from Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y.; Sen. Jack Reed, D-R.I., the ranking member of the Armed Services Committee; and Sen. Jeanne Shaheen, D-N.H., the ranking member of the Foreign Relations Committee, among others.”
* From the Vatican: “Pope Leo XIV blasted Trump’s latest threats against Iran as ‘truly unacceptable,’ in his most recent rebuke of the U.S.’ actions in Iran.”
* From Turtle Bay: “The United Nations rebuked Trump’s threats to Iran at a press briefing in New York today, during which U.N. spokesperson Stéphane Dujarric implored leaders to ‘choose dialogue over destruction.’ … ‘There is no military objective that justifies the wholesale destruction of a society’s infrastructure or the deliberate infliction of suffering on civilian populations,’ Dujarric said.”
* Fortunately, most of these injuries have not been serious: “At least 373 American service members have been wounded since the start of the war with Iran on Feb. 28, according to the U.S. Central Command.”
* He obviously needs to go: “After Representative Tony Gonzales, Republican of Texas, admitted in March to a sexual relationship with a staff member who later took her own life, House Republican leaders called for him to end his re-election campaign but stopped short of pressing him to resign from Congress. On Monday, Speaker Mike Johnson and other top Republicans remained mum about Mr. Gonzales’s future in the House after a new batch of texts surfaced indicating that his extramarital affair with Regina Santos-Aviles was part of a pattern of seeking inappropriate sexual relationships with female subordinates.”
* A case worth watching: ‘As of this moment, the Administration believes that the President is legally free to destroy records of his official government conduct, or even spirit away the records for his own future personal use.’ That’s what two nonprofit groups told a federal court in Washington on Monday, in a legal complaint seeking a declaration that the Presidential Records Act is constitutional. The complaint was prompted by a bold new claim to the contrary by the Trump Justice Department’s Office of Legal Counsel.”
See you tomorrow.
Steve Benen is a producer for “The Rachel Maddow Show,” the editor of MaddowBlog and an MS NOW political contributor. He’s also the bestselling author of “Ministry of Truth: Democracy, Reality, and the Republicans’ War on the Recent Past.”
The Dictatorship
Over 50 Democrats push 25th Amendment as Trump threatens to kill ‘a whole civilization’
President Donald Trump’s threat to wipe out “a whole civilization” in Iran has prompted growing calls from Democrats to remove him through a constitutional mechanism that has never been used to end a presidency: The 25th Amendment.
“A whole civilization will die tonight, never to be brought back again,” Trump posted on Truth Social on Tuesday morning. “I don’t want that to happen, but it probably will.”
He continued, saying with a “different, smarter, and less radicalized” regime in Iran, he hoped Tehran would come to a deal on the Strait of Hormuz. But he left it open that the United States would strike Iran on Tuesday night if a deal was not reached.
“WHO KNOWS?” Trump asked.

The post came just 12 hours before the president’s previously announced deadline for Iran to reopen the Strait of Hormuz or risk the U.S. attacking bridges and power plants. Or, as the president put it in an expletive-laced Easter morning social media post“Open the Fuckin’ Strait, you crazy bastards, or you’ll be living in Hell.”
In response to Trump’s threats, Democrats started a new trend on Tuesday that put the onus for Trump’s removal on some of the president’s most obsequious officials, calling on Trump’s Cabinet to invoke the 25th Amendment and declare the president unfit for office. Doing so would, in effect, remove Trump from the White House and replace him with Vice President JD Vance.
In a social media post, Rep. Ilhan Omar, D-Minn., called for “this unhinged lunatic” to “be removed from office.” Rep. Ro Khanna, D-Calif., said“Threatening war crimes is a blatant violation of our constitution and the Geneva Conventions.” And Rep. Yassamin Ansari, D-Ariz., wrote“In the last 48 hours alone, the rhetoric has crossed every line.”
“Donald Trump’s instability is more clear and dangerous than ever,” said former Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif.
As of early Tuesday evening, more than four dozen Democrats had called on Trump’s Cabinet to invoke the 25th Amendment, including Rep. Jamie Raskin, D-Md.; Rep. Robert Garcia, D-Calif.; Rep. Zoe Lofgren, D-Calif.; Rep. Adriano Espaillat, DN.Y.; Rep. Ritchie Torres, D-N.Y.; and Rep. Teresa Leger Fernández, D.N.M.
Of course, these calls are unlikely to do much of anything.
To actually remove Trump from office, the vice president and a majority of the Cabinet would have to agree that the president “is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office.” If the president were to dispute that assessment, as he almost certainly would, at least two-thirds of the House and Senate would have to agree that the president is unfit to serve to remove him from office.

The threshold in Congress is actually higher than what is required through a straight impeachment and conviction.
The bar, said Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse, D-R.I., is too high to clear at this moment, as Republicans on Capitol Hill and in Trump’s Cabinet remain in lockstep with the president.
“We’re going to have to buckle down and win this the old-fashioned way,” Whitehouse added in another post.
Some Democrats, such as Rep. Diane DeGette, D-Col.were clear that, if the Cabinet refused to invoke the 25th Amendment, then Congress should begin impeachment proceedings, an unlikely endeavor on its own in the GOP-controlled Congress.
But Democrats have increasingly argued that Trump’s war with Iran, coupled with what they have described as bellicose and progressively unhinged rhetoric, have crossed the line. (Some of the YOU are faithfulsuch as former Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene and conservative commentators Alex Jones and Candace Owens, have also called on Trump’s Cabinet to invoke the 25th Amendment.)
Still, almost every Republican in Congress has stood by Trump. In fact, rather than pushing back on the president, some criticized Greene on Tuesday.
“The TRUE madness is calling for the 25th to be used against one of the greatest presidents our nation has ever seen! @POTUS is making the entire planet safer,” Rep. Marlin Stutzman, R-Ind., wrote on Xadding that Greene is “starting to sound like” Rep. Rashida Tlaib, D-Mich., and Tucker Carlson.
Most other Republicans have remained silent on Trump’s threats. House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., made two posts Tuesday, one touting the “no tax on tips” from the GOP’s reconciliation bill and one cheering the International Olympic Committee for recognizing that “women’s sports are meant for biological women.”
Johnson, like Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., has remained silent on Trump’s escalating rhetoric.
Notably, however, some Republicans have started to offer indirect criticism.
During an appearance on conservative journalist and commentator John Solomon’s podcast on Monday, Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wis., said he is “hoping and praying” that Trump’s threat against Iran “really is bluster.”
“I do not want to see us start blowing up civilian infrastructure,” Johnson said. “I do not want to see that.”

Rep. Nathaniel Moran, R-Texas, also posted online that he does not support “the destruction of a ‘whole civilization.’”
“That is not who we are, and it is not consistent with the principles that have long guided America,” he said.
And Rep. Don Bacon, R-Neb., told MS NOW on Tuesday that while the president’s words about eliminating “a whole civilization” are “reckless,” he argued it is the president “negotiating Trump-style.”
“I do want to see the regime buckle and make a true peace,” Bacon said in a statement.
Democratic leaders in Congress have also been predictably critical of Trump’s threats, though they have stopped short of immediately calling for the 25th Amendment.
House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y.; Majority Whip Katherine Clark, D-Mass.; and leading Democrats have instead called for the House to “come back into session immediately and vote to end this reckless war of choice in the Middle East before Donald Trump plunges our country into World War III.”
And top Senate Democrats, including Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., and Sen. Chris Coons, D-Del., in a statement condemned the president’s messagesaying it is “not strength.”
“Intentionally destroying the power, water, or basic infrastructure upon which tens of millions of civilians depend to punish the very civilians who suffer at the hands of the Iranian regime would constitute a war crime, a betrayal of the values this nation was founded on, and a moral failure,” they wrote.
While calls have grown for the invocation of the 25th Amendment, some Democrats have targeted others in the administration, such as Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth.

On Monday, Ansari said she planned to introduce articles of impeachment against Hegseth “for repeatedly violating his oath of office and his duty to the Constitution.”
“Only Congress has the power to declare war, not a rogue president or his lackeys. Hegseth’s reckless endangerment of U.S. servicemembers and repeated war crimes, including bombing a girls’ school in Minab, Iran and willfully targeting civilian infrastructure, are grounds for impeachment and removal from office,” she said.
For months now, Democrats have wrestled with the question of presidential accountability — namely, how much to focus on it as part of their party’s midterm messaging and potential governing agenda.
The fear among some Democrats is that focusing too much on anti-Trump sentiment could distract from a positive, kitchen-table agenda.
But as the second year of Trump’s presidency careens from domestic crises to an escalating overseas conflict, the president may be forcing Democrats’ hand. And depending on what happens Tuesday night, the entire political landscape could change with his military actions — and the debate over accountability could shift from theoretical to immediate very quickly.
Kevin Frey is a congressional reporter for MS NOW.
Mychael Schnell is a reporter for MS NOW.
-
The Dictatorship1 year agoLuigi Mangione acknowledges public support in first official statement since arrest
-
Politics1 year agoFormer ‘Squad’ members launching ‘Bowman and Bush’ YouTube show
-
Politics1 year agoFormer Kentucky AG Daniel Cameron launches Senate bid
-
The Dictatorship1 year agoPete Hegseth’s tenure at the Pentagon goes from bad to worse
-
Politics1 year agoBlue Light News’s Editorial Director Ryan Hutchins speaks at Blue Light News’s 2025 Governors Summit
-
The Dictatorship7 months agoMike Johnson sums up the GOP’s arrogant position on military occupation with two words
-
Uncategorized1 year ago
Bob Good to step down as Freedom Caucus chair this week
-
Politics12 months agoDemocrat challenging Joni Ernst: I want to ‘tear down’ party, ‘build it back up’








