Connect with us

The Dictatorship

I helped announce a Target boycott last year. Now I’m announcing it’s not over.

Published

on

I helped announce a Target boycott last year. Now I’m announcing it’s not over.

Earlier this week, an Atlanta pastor of a mega church held a press conference—some might even call it a commercial for Target—announcing that the boycott against the retail giant had ended. But the National Target Boycott is a grassroots movement that the Rev. Jamal Bryant did not start and that he has no authority to end.

On Jan. 30, 2025, I and two other Minnesota organizers — Monique Cullars-Doty of Black Lives Matter Minnesota and Jaylani Hussein of CAIR Minnesota — stood outside Target’s corporate headquarters in Minneapolis to announce a nationwide boycott to begin on February 1, the first day of Black History Month.

For many of us in Minneapolis, the company’s swift capitulation to Trump was stunning.

During the first week of Donald Trump’s second term, his administration launched sweeping attacks on diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives across government and corporate America. Our call to action followed a shocking decision by Target’s leadership days later to roll back key DEI commitments it had made.

For many of us in Minneapolis, the company’s swift capitulation to Trump was stunning.

Minneapolis is where police murdered George Floyd in 2020 and sparked a global reckoning on racial justice. In the months that followed, Target pledged $2.1 billion toward advancing racial equity:  $2 billion in spending with Black-owned businesses by 2025 and more than $100 million in investments and resources supporting Black communities and Black talent. Those commitments helped rebuild trust between the company and communities that had long supported it.

Then, almost overnight, Target reversed course. Why should we end the boycott now when Target hasn’t changed any of the policies that caused us to launch the boycott?

Before then, the company had already donated $1 million to the Trump–Vance inauguration committee. For many consumers, the message was unmistakable: when forced to choose between its public commitments to racial justice and bending to arpolitical pressure from the Trump administration, Target chose the latter.

Our concerns did not stop there. Late last year, as federal immigration enforcement operations intensified across Minnesota, immigration agents were seen staging activities in Target parking lots and entering stores during enforcement actions. Target’s leadership remained largely silent, reinforcing the perception that the company was willing to look the other way as federal agents targeted communities that make up a significant percentage of its workforce and customer base.

As federal immigration enforcement operations intensified across Minnesota, immigration agents were seen staging activities in Target parking lots and entering stores during enforcement actions.

When NPR reported on anti-ICE protesters picketing a Target store in January, the company noted that the company’s incoming CEO Michael Fiddelke had signed onto an open letter with the Minnesota Chamber of Commerce and the CEOs of 60 Minnesota businesses calling for “an immediate deescalation of tensions and for state, local and federal officials to work together to find real solutions.” After videos of federal agents tackling and detaining two Target employees inside a local storethe company only said it “does not have cooperative agreements with ICE or any other immigration enforcement agency.”

In a city where Nicole Renee Good and Alex Pretti were killed by federal immigration agents, that statement from Target does nothing.

What began outside Target’s headquarters quickly grew into a nationwide movement. Over the past year, organizers, faith leaders, civil rights advocates, and everyday consumers have worked tirelessly to hold Target accountable. The boycott gained national attention, and it has certainly had an impact.

Pastor Jamal H. Bryant.
Pastor Jamal H. Bryant speaks onstage during “TARGET FAST” TownHall Meeting on April 22, 2025 in Lithonia, Ga. Paras Griffin / Getty Images

Target has faced months of declining store trafficdecreased sales and revenue, and significant drops in its stock price since our boycott began. Billions of dollars in market value have been wiped out. The company ultimately replaced its longtime CEO amid mounting pressure and weak financial performance, and the new CEO has acknowledged that the boycott has hurt Target’s sales.

Just as importantly, Target’s reputation as a socially conscious company—one it spent years cultivating—has taken a significant hit among the very communities that once trusted it most.

Yet, instead of addressing the root causes of the backlash, Target’s leadership has responded with a series of tone-deaf gestures. The company has focused on remodeling stores, introducing new brands, and urging its employees to smile in hopes of reversing declining sales.

But the problem facing Target is not cosmetic. It’s moral.

Shoppers who’ve stayed away for almost 13 months want the company to restore the diversity, equity, and inclusion commitments it abandoned and to honor the $2.1 billion racial equity pledge it made following George Floyd’s murder. Target’s outgoing CEO wrote in July that Target would fulfill its $2 billion commitment to Black businesses by the end of 2025.  But even Bryant said in August that he hadn’t seen evidence that was true. It’s March now, and we haven’t been shown any evidence either.

Until that happens, trust will remain broken.

Across the country, countless people have vowed they will never shop at Target again. That is not a decision people make lightly. Target has long been woven into the fabric of communities across America. But when a corporation abandons its commitments to equity at the very moment those values are under political attack, the people have every right to respond.

Target chose a side. So did we.

The power of this movement comes from the people who built it—especially Black consumers and women, who drive a significant share of household purchasing decisions in this country.

Gone are the days when corporations can cherry-pick a handful of leaders and tell the rest of us who speaks for our communities.

We the people decide.

The boycott will not end until the people who built it say it is over.

Until that day comes, consumers across this country will continue to do what we have done for more than a year: organize, speak out, and vote with our dollars.

Because in the end, corporations may have enormous power—but so do the people who sustain them.

The Target boycott isn’t over. In fact, it’s time to double down.

Nekima Levy Armstrong is an award-winning civil rights lawyer, scholar-activist, and past president of the Minneapolis NAACP.

Read More

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Dictatorship

Trump’s proposed cuts to NASA are an insult to astronauts like the Artemis crew

Published

on

Friday’s splashdown of the Artemis II crew, the first to travel to the moon since the Apollo program ended in 1972, is a moment of celebration for all of us on Earth.

But it’s also an important reminder that, despite this success, the current administration’s Office of Management and Budget is proposing budget cuts that will all but dismantle much of NASA. It’s surprising, illogical and very troubling.

The proposed cuts would terminate 53 NASA Science missions, throwing away more than $13 billion in taxpayer investment.

The proposed cuts would terminate 53 NASA Science missions, throwing away more than $13 billion in taxpayer investment and halting the development of nearly every future NASA Science mission.

These cuts would be an insult to our astronauts and entire NASA workforce. Astronauts and their colleagues are civil servants who work hard, accomplish nearly impossible things and represent our country to the world.

It’s an odd choice from an administration that has pledged to put America first, to be sure. But stranger still, and quite personal to me, is the OMB’s proposal to completely end NASA’s STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math) outreach program, which supports students and teachers nationwide. Programs like this have helped the United States be a world leader in science and technology.

We cannot allow this.

The U.S. has many great institutions, but NASA is a unique part of the American story. NASA is the best brand our nation has. When people around the world think of the U.S. at its best, they think of astronauts exploring the moon, telescopes opening new windows on the cosmos and spacecraft making profound discoveries on other worlds. NASA is who we are when we’re curious, bold and united.

There is also a growing consensus in Washington that we are in a new space race, this time, with the China National Space Administration, which, by the way, is planning to have taikonauts walk on the Moon in 2030. If the race is on, why abandon so much? Why cede the lead? The U.S. cannot be first in space if it is second in science and technology.

The administration proposed almost the same draconian cuts to NASA last year. When it did, we the people fought back. The Planetary Society, along with more than 300 advocates and 19 other partner organizations, went to Washington and organized the largest grassroots advocacy outreach for space science in history. Tens of thousands of citizens from every state and congressional district wrote, called and made their case to their elected officials. Together, we successfully saved NASA.

Now, this year, we have no choice but to fight back. On April 20, we will return to Washington, where people can join in person or join our Save NASA Science campaign online.

Science is not a luxury. It is a responsibility. Our founders knew it; you will find “Science” cited in Article 1, Section 8 of the Constitution. Only a public space agency can sustain decades-long investments in the kind of science that tells us whether life ever existed on Mars, that tracks the asteroids that could threaten every living thing on Earth and that reveals the story of our origin.

NASA’s science program is a bargain for Americans. It accounted for one-tenth of 1% of the nation’s expenditures last year, a tenth of a penny of every tax dollar.

Cutting science would not just delay discovery; it would destroy it. It would shatter our STEM talent pipeline. It would abandon our international partners. And, it would cede U.S. leadership in space science to China and other nations.

NASA’s science program is a bargain for Americans. It accounted for one-tenth of 1% of the nation’s expenditures last year, a tenth of a penny of every tax dollar. And for every dollar spent, three come back into the economy. Every year, NASA generates $75 billion of economic growth and supports over 300,000 jobs in all 50 states.

Members of Congress and the Senate agree: NASA is a remarkable investment. I’ve met with both Republicans and Democrats, all of whom support space science. And last year, an overwhelming bipartisan majority rejected these same cuts.

NASA is what makes America great. It represents our best values: curiosity, determination, tenacity, and global cooperation. It proves that we are capable of extraordinary things. When we invest in scientific exploration, we invest in ourselves — in our economy, security and future.

If we concede and retreat from the frontier of space after a half century of leadership, it would be an unworthy choice. If Artemis II has showed us anything, it’s that the public, across the political spectrum, strongly supports space exploration, scientific discovery and a deeper understanding of the universe and our place within it.

Bill Nye is the chief ambassador at The Planetary Society, the world’s largest space interest organization.

Read More

Continue Reading

The Dictatorship

Artemis II mission splashes down, returning to Earth

Published

on

Artemis II mission splashes down, returning to Earth

After making history as the farthest journey into space humans have ever made, NASA’s Artemis II mission returned to Earth on Friday, splashing down off the coast southwest of San Diego.

The Artemis II crew splashed down successfully at 5:07:47 p.m. PT. The Orion spacecraft launched last weekfrom the Kennedy Space Center in Florida, the first crewed flight to the moon in more than 50 years. The entire mission from liftoff took a total of nine days, one hour, 31 minutes and 35 seconds, which NASA rounds up, to call it a 10-day mission.

In the buildup to the mission, questions about the craft’s heat shield led to concerns among some experts about whether Orion would hold up on reentry to the Earth’s atmosphere, the most perilous part of any crewed mission. A NASA-commissioned panel ultimately deemed the ship safewith the astronauts themselves endorsing it ahead of time.

The four-member crew — NASA astronauts Reid Wiseman, Victor Glover and Christina Koch, along with Canadian Space Agency astronaut Jeremy Hansen — embarked on the 10-day mission to fly around the moon, setting the stage for future missions aimed at establishing a permanent lunar base.

After splashdown, NASA administrator Jared Isaacman praised the crew, calling them “wonderful communicators, almost poets,” during an interview Friday evening.

“These were the ambassadors from humanity to the starts that we sent out there,” Isaacman said.

He also emphasized that this mission set the stage for a future moon landing — and base.

“This is not a once in a lifetime … This is just the beginning,” he said during the interview. “We are going to get back into doing this with frequency, sending missions to the moon, until we land on it in 2028 and start building our base.”

On April 6, the spacecraft reached 252,756 miles from Earth, the farthest distance traveled by humans. Artemis II broke the Apollo 13crew’s record of 248,655 miles, set in 1970.

The crew conducted a seven-hour lunar flyby, coming within about 4,000 miles of the moon’s surface and seeing areas of the moon never before seen by the naked eye. In addition to testing the spacecraft, the astronauts studied the far side of the moon during a solar eclipse and observed lunar geological features and color variations.

Now back on Earth, the astronauts will undergo medical evaluations before heading to shore and traveling to NASA’s Johnson Space Center in Houston.

The next such mission, Artemis IIIis expected to launch next year.

Erum Salam is a breaking news reporter for MS NOW, with a focus on how global events and foreign policy shape U.S. politics. She previously was a breaking news reporter for The Guardian.

Read More

Continue Reading

The Dictatorship

Former staffer accuses Rep. Eric Swalwell of sexual assault, reports say

Published

on

Former staffer accuses Rep. Eric Swalwell of sexual assault, reports say

A former staffer has accused Democratic Rep. Eric Swalwell, a current candidate for California governor, of reportedly sexually assaulting her.

The allegations were first reported by the San Francisco Chronicle.

The woman, who has not been publicly identified and worked for Swalwell for nearly two years, alleged she had sexual encounters while he was her boss, and he sexually assaulted her on two occasions when she was too intoxicated to consent, the Chronicle reported. The woman told the paper Swalwell began pursuing her weeks after she was hired at age 21 to work in the Democrat’s district in 2019.

The woman claimed Swalwell invited her for drinks in 2019, and during that encounter, she became too intoxicated to remember what happened. She alleged she woke up naked in his hotel bed, and following the incident, he distanced himself and their relationship eventually dissolved.

Five years later, in 2024, the woman alleged she attended a charity gala where Swalwell was honored. After the event, she said they met for drinks and she became intoxicated, but remembers only fragments of the night, including pushing him away and saying “no” as he allegedly forced himself on her. She texted a friend three days later, according to the Chronicle, saying she had been sexually assaulted by Swalwell.

In text messages, independently review by the Chronicle, the woman told her friend she “blacked out” but “woke up once during it and even told him to stop at one point.”

The Chronicle spoke with the woman’s friend and the woman’s ex-boyfriend, who she said she told about the alleged 2024 assault the following day. Both corroborated her story and described her as appearing disoriented.

Medical records, according to the Chronicle, also show she sought pregnancy and sexually transmitted disease tests about a week after the incident.

The woman told the Chronicle she did not immediately tell authorities because she feared people wouldn’t believe she was telling the truth.

Swalwell, who has represented California’s 14th Congressional District since 2013 and launched his gubernatorial campaign earlier this year, strongly denied the claims in a statement Friday.

“These allegations are false and come on the eve of an election against the frontrunner for governor. For nearly 20 years, I have served the public — as a prosecutor and a congressman and have always protected women,” Swalwell said. “I will defend myself with the facts and where necessary bring legal action. My focus in the coming days is to be with my wife and children and defend our decades of service against these lies.”

An attorney for Swalwell sent the woman a cease-and-desist letter on Thursday, according to the Chronicle, accusing her of making false claims of sexual assault and nonconsensual encounters, and warning that legal action would follow if she did not retract the allegations.

In a separate report, three other women spoke with CNNabout alleged various kinds of sexual misconduct, including Swalwell sending them unsolicited inappropriate messages or photos. The messages, the women said, were often sent through Snapchat, which is a social media platform that allows messages to delete automatically and notifies users of screenshots.

“Some of the allegations I’ve seen, which is that we’ve had NDAs in the office — never. There’s never been an allegation, and there’s never been a settlement,” Swalwell told reporters Tuesday.

Political fallout

Swalwell’s campaign initially showed signs of strong momentum in the crowded California governor’s race to replace current Gov. Gavin Newsom, who has called the allegations “deeply troubling.”

“As we continue to learn more, these allegations from multiple sources are deeply troubling and must be taken seriously,” Newsom’s spokesperson said in a statement to MS NOW.

Swalwell’s campaign also benefited from backing from key Democratic allies, positioning him as a viable contender in a fragmented field with no clear front-runner.

But the reports of the allegations, along with separate unverified claimscirculating online, have sparked backlash and prompted some political fallout, including campaign disruptions and heightened attention from rivals. Multiple people resigned from Swalwell’s orbit ahead of Friday’s scathing report of sexual assault, including Courtni Pugh, who served as a strategic adviser.

Rep. Jimmy GomezD-Calif., resignedas co-chair of Swalwell’s campaign, saying in part “he cannot in good conscience remain” in the role and suggesting that Swalell “should leave the race now.” Rep. Adam Gray, D-Calif., also resigned as campaign co-chair and called for Swalwell to suspend the campaign.

Other prominent Democrats also quickly began distancing themselves.

House Democrats issued a joint statement calling for a “swift investigation” and for Swalwell to end his bid.

“All perpetrators of sexual assault and harassment must be held accountable,” House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-NY wrote.

Former Speaker Nancy Pelosi declared this an “extremely sensitive matter” and said she discussed with Swalwell that the investigation would be “best done outside of a gubernatorial campaign.”

Sen. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., said he is “deeply distressed” about the allegations surrounding Swalwell and immediately withdrew his endorsement.

“This woman was brave to come forward, and we should take her story seriously,” Schiff said on X. “I am withdrawing my endorsement immediately, and believe that he should withdraw from the race.”

Sen. Ruben Gallego, D-Ariz., called the allegations “indefensible” and also immediately withdrew his endorsement of his longtime ally.

“Women who come forward with accounts like this deserve to be heard with respect, not questioned or dismissed. I regret having come to his defense on social media prior to knowing all the information. I am equally as shocked and upset about what has transpired,” Gallego wroteon X.

Two of Swalwell’s key labor allies, Service Employees International Union of California withdrew and California Teachers Association, retracted their support Friday, marking a significant blow to his campaign.

“The allegations are incredibly disturbing and unacceptable against Rep. Swalwell. We are immediately suspending our support. Our elected board will be meeting as soon as possible to follow our union’s democratic process to determine next steps,” the CTA said in a statement.

Democratic billionaire Tom Steyer said he commends“the brave former staffer who came forward with her story” about Swalwell.

“Speaking out is never easy, and her account must be taken seriously. At a moment like this, we must make sure that women are heard, and justice is pursued,” Steyer added.

Former Rep. Katie Porter called the allegation “horrifying,” adding she is thinking of the courageous women who have come forward to share their stories.”

The California Democratic Party labeled the allegations “deeply disturbing.”

“Any person engaged in misconduct must take responsibility and be held accountable for their actions — including a Member and candidate for Governor,” CADEM Chair Rusty Hicks said.

Swalwell’s Republican gubernatorial opponent, former Fox News host Steve Hilton, blasted Swalwell over the allegations in a statement to MS NOW.

“It’s incredible to me that Eric Swalwell thought he could run for Governor of California while all this was going on,” Hilton said in the statement. “It shows the complete contempt these career politicians have for the public.”

As of Friday evening, Swalwell’s fundraising page on ActBlue appeared to no longer be accepting donations.

Jillian Frankel and Syedah Asghar contributed to this report.

Ebony Davis is a breaking news reporter for MS NOW based in Washington, D.C. She previously worked at BLN as a campaign reporter covering elections and politics.

Read More

Continue Reading

Trending