Connect with us

Congress

House Republicans plan major SNAP food aid overhaul in Trump megabill

Published

on

House Republicans are preparing one of the largest overhauls to the country’s largest anti-hunger programs in decades, with a plan to limit future increases to benefits, implement deep new work requirements and push costs to states in a move that risks millions of low-income Americans being removed from the program.

The Agriculture bill has faced delays since last recess amid centrist backlash over the deep food aid spending cuts. But GOP leaders are targeting a markup for next week, May 13 or 14, after deciding late last week to push back this week’s expected meeting, according to four people with direct knowledge of the matter.

Republicans in the last day have altered the most controversial piece of the House Agriculture Committee’s portion of the Trump megabill: a plan to force states to pay a portion of benefits under the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program for the first time. The program helps to feed more than 40 million low-income Americans.

A previous proposal the panel was pursuing would have seen the states’ share of costs reach 25 percent by the end of a10-year window, while stair-stepping in and not starting until after 2027. Several centrists, including Reps. Don Bacon (R-Neb.) and David Valadao (R-Calif.), have raised concerns about the plan. Rep. Derrick Van Orden, who represents a more competitive district in Wisconsin, walked out of an Agriculture panel GOP briefing last week over the matter, slinging an insult at staff before he left. Van Orden also stood up in the closed-door House GOP conference meeting to raise concerns about the even reworked cost-share proposal, arguing his state was being unfairly penalized. Rep. Doug LaMalfa later stood up and reiterated the panel needs to reach $230 billion cuts. White House officials and other Republicans have been wary of the impact on deep red states of the SNAP plans in combination with Medicaid spending cuts. But White House officials effectively green-lit the proposal in recent days.

The latest plan would phase in for the 2028 fiscal year and skew more of the financial burden to states with higher payment error payment rates, while decrease the percentage of the cost-share on states with fewer penalties to start as low as 10 percent, as Republicans were considering amid the backlash.

A spokesperson for Agriculture Committee Republicans declined to comment.

Senior House Republicans say they need the cost-share measure to hit the $230 billion in cuts across the Agriculture panel’s jurisdiction, with the bulk focusing on spending cuts to SNAP.

But beyond the cost-share plan, Agriculture Republicans will increase the age of recipients who need to complete work requirements to receive food aid, reaching so-called able-bodied adults with children age 7 and older for the first time. That move alone is expected to save at least $40 billion, according to projections from the Congressional Budget Office.

Another piece of Republicans’ plan, which has long been panned by Democrats, is to limit future increases to families’ SNAP benefits after a recent Biden-era update created a record increase that shocked Republican lawmakers. Republicans would effectively limit future updates to the Thrifty Food Plan that serves as the basis of SNAP benefits, in order to make any future updates cost-neutral and also include a cost-of-living adjustment.

The bill will also crack down on what Republicans say are largely blue state abuses of waivers that skirt current SNAP rules, including waivers of certain layers of work requirements. And it will end a so-called internet utility loophole from the Biden administration and another loophole associated with the Low Income Energy Assistance Program that Republicans argue allows states to skirt a standard utility deduction in the SNAP program.

The Agriculture panel is also planning to fit a raft of farm bill program funding into its portion of the megabill, with the goal to pass a smaller, slimmed down farm bill later this year without major fights over mandatory funding.

One aim is to rescind billions in climate-focused agriculture program dollars from the Biden administration and reinvest it into the farm bill baseline. Agriculture Republicans also want to add tens of billions of dollars for crop reference prices but also trade export promotion, livestock biosecurity, additional so-called orphan programs and more pieces that represent mandatory funding to the GOP package. But some Republicans are skeptical GOP leaders will accept such a tall order, especially with hard-line House fiscal hawks deeply opposed to such spending and time running out.

“It’s still gotta math,” hard-liner Rep. Chip Roy (R-Texas) warned Tuesday morning. “Now they want to add more?”

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Congress

House Democrats are launching a longshot procedural move to prevent safety net cuts

Published

on

House Democratic leaders said Tuesday they would launch a longshot effort to force a vote on a bill preventing cuts to key federal safety-net programs.

The discharge petition is meant to put political pressure on Republicans as they eye cuts to Medicaid and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program in writing their domestic policy megabill.

“All we need are four House Republicans to join Democrats in protecting the health care and nutritional assistance of the American people,” House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries told reporters Tuesday.

If 218 members sign the discharge petition, it would force a floor vote on a bill that would prevent the House from taking up bills under the party-line reconciliation process that would cut Medicaid or SNAP. Members are generally reluctant to buck party leadership to sign discharge petitions, and GOP leaders have taken steps this Congress to block the process entirely.

Continue Reading

Congress

Robert Garcia is making quiet moves toward an Oversight Committee bid

Published

on

Rep. Robert Garcia is starting to make quiet moves towards a bid to lead Democrats on the House Oversight Committee, according to five people granted anonymity to discuss his behind-the-scenes maneuvers.

The Californian has started to round up support from other Democrats who are encouraging him to run and is testing the waters by making calls to other colleagues, the people said.

Both privately and publicly, Garcia is showing deference to Rep. Gerry Connolly (D-Va.), who announced last week he will step aside as top Oversight Democrat due to a battle with cancer.

“Right now there’s like no election, and so I think those of us on the Oversight Committee are just focused on Gerry’s health,” Garcia told reporters Tuesday. “We just wish him the very best.”

Still, many Democrats are eyeing the high-profile post after Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez said Monday she would forgo a bid. That decision is likely to open up the field for a host of other ambitious young Democrats — including Garcia, 47.

Connolly has yet to formally step aside, so no election has been scheduled. He designated Rep. Stephen Lynch of Massachusetts as the interim top Democrat; Lynch said last week he intends to seek the job permanently.

Any contest is expected to be hotly contested, and lawmakers have made preliminary moves to lock down support. Rep. Jasmine Crockett (D-Texas) has already started to privately maneuver for the job, and Reps. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) and Maxwell Frost (D-Fla.) could also be in the mix. Frost and Garcia are close, and some Democrats believe the two would not run against each other.

“At this point I feel like half the committee is wanting to run for the seat,” said Rep. Becca Balint (D-Vt.), who served on the Oversight panel last Congress. She stood up in House Democrats’ closed-door caucus meeting Monday to say “we need to be utilizing all of our talent in the caucus” by elevating younger lawmakers, she said.

Another Democrat, who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss caucus dynamics, said he was “really excited” to support Garcia should he choose to run. That Democrat said he had supported Connolly for the Oversight position last year.

Garcia currently serves in Democratic leadership, holding a position reserved for lawmakers who have served fewer than five terms in Congress. Should he mount an Oversight run, he could draw the backing of the Congressional Hispanic Caucus. Only one CHC member, Rep. Nydia Velazquez of New York, holds a committee leadership position.

Should Democrats take control of the House in the 2026 midterms, the Oversight chair would have broad jurisdiction to investigate the Trump administration and a central role in the party’s accountability efforts over the executive branch. For now, the ranking member is a key foil to Oversight Republicans’ continued efforts to investigate former President Joe Biden’s administration.

Continue Reading

Congress

Tillis says he’ll oppose Ed Martin, dealing grave blow to Trump’s D.C. prosecutor pick

Published

on

GOP Sen. Thom Tillis said Tuesday he has told the White House he will oppose Ed Martin’s nomination to be the top federal prosecutor for the District of Columbia, a potentially fatal blow to his already dicey confirmation chances.

Tillis spoke to reporters after meeting with Martin on Monday night. The North Carolinian, who is seeking reelection next year, had previously signaled he had concerns with Martin’s nomination as U.S. attorney because of his previous comments related to the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol attack and his work defending those who took part in the riot.

“I have no tolerance for anybody that entered the building on Jan. 6, and that’s probably where most of the friction was,” Tillis said Tuesday.

Senate Majority Leader John Thune told reporters after Tillis’ comments that Martin is now unlikely to emerge from the Senate Judiciary Committee.

Martin is now serving as acting U.S. attorney for D.C. — an appointment that expires May 20. President Donald Trump is lobbying hard for Martin’s confirmation, posting about it on Truth Social Monday: “Ed is coming up on the deadline for Voting and, if approved, HE WILL NOT LET YOU DOWN.”

Tillis is a member of the Judiciary Committee, and his opposition means the panel would likely deadlock on Martin’s nomination, 11-11, with several other Judiciary Republicans still uncommitted. Senate Republicans could try to advance him out of committee without a recommendation, but Martin would face bigger headaches on the floor: GOP Sens. Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, Susan Collins of Maine, John Curtis of Utah and Mitch McConnell of Kentucky are viewed as votes to watch.

Tillis said he did not expect Martin to come up in the Senate Judiciary Committee for a vote. Judiciary Chair Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) did not respond to questions about Martin’s nomination Tuesday.

Continue Reading

Trending