Connect with us

The Dictatorship

Columbia University protester says year in ICE custody ‘destroyed’ her physical health

Published

on

Columbia University protester says year in ICE custody ‘destroyed’ her physical health

Leqaa Kordia, a Palestinian woman who was detained by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement for more than a year after participating in protests near Columbia Universitysat down with MS NOW for her first television interview since being released from custody.

She joined “The Weekend: Primetime” on Sunday to discuss her time inside a Texas detention center and the toll it took on her physical and mental health.

Earlier this month, an immigration judge ordered that Kordia be released on a $100,000 bond. The 33-year-old had been held at the Prairieland Detention Center in Alvarado, Texas, since last March, after federal authorities arrested her for overstaying her student visa. She has not been charged with a crime.

“It was an awful experience,” she said of her time at the Texas facility. “It was a long, tough year. The conditions in ICE detentions are horrible, horrific. I always say that we need days to talk about [a] few of the conditions.”

According to Kordia, detainees live in inhumane conditions and lack adequate access to nutritious food and proper health care, which she said she witnessed firsthand after suffering from a seizure while in custody. “Medical care is horrible,” she said. “They don’t have doctors. They don’t have even nurses.”

She said she had a fever a few days before experiencing a seizure. “I looked miserable,” she said. “I felt miserable, and I was begging them for help. … Nobody showed up.”

While Kordia said she does not remember what happened in the moments before her seizure, she recalled waking up in the medical unit “terrified.”

For the next three days, she was “chained” to a hospital bed, she said. “If I wanted to use the bathroom, I would be chained. If I wanted to take a shower, I’d be chained,” she told MS NOW.

“I actually felt relieved when I went back to the dorm because my experience at the hospital was like they’re torturing me,” she added.

Kordia said the experience “destroyed” her physical health. “I experienced my first seizure ever in my whole life,” she said. “Now I have to be on a heavy anti-seizure medication for at least two years. This is like changing my whole health.”

She also spoke about the emotional toll of her year in detention, saying: “It’s affecting my mental health also — like, not having a stable physical health affects your mental health. I was in a jail for a whole year. I was treated awfully. I was humiliated many times, so often.”

You can watch Kordia’s full interview in the clip at the top of the page.

Allison Detzel is an editor/producer for MS NOW. She was previously a segment producer for “AYMAN” and “The Mehdi Hasan Show.”

Read More

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Dictatorship

JD Vance responds to Joe Rogan’s complaint about MAGA ‘dorks’

Published

on

JD Vance responds to Joe Rogan’s complaint about MAGA ‘dorks’

For many people who care deeply about issues like civil rights, combating child sex abuse and thwarting corruption, there has never been anything cool about the MAGA movement.

But now it seems that others inside the tent are coming around to that realization as well, albeit a bit more slowly.

President Donald Trump and his allies have used everything from misinformed emcees to gamer memes to project an air of coolness around the MAGA movement. But evidence suggests the air is beginning to evaporate, even among supporters of the president. Multiple polls this year have shown Trump’s support among young men, the group arguably most responsible for propping up this facade of coolness, has hit new lows, compared to where it was during the 2024 election.

At Blue Light News”https://www.Blue Light News.com/news/2026/03/28/iran-trump-maga-men-divide-cpac-00849378″>report on the Conservative Political Action Conference over the weekend underscored this trend, citing multiple conservative young men who said Trump’s warmongering in Iran was turning them off ahead of this year’s midterms. The New York Times published a similar dispatch from the conference, highlighting young conservatives’ disillusionment with MAGA.

And all of this seems relevant to Vice President JD Vance’s recent attempt to downplay a complaint from Trump-aligned podcaster Joe Rogan, who disparaged MAGA for attracting “dorks.”

In his NSFW rant, Rogan (who endorsed Trump in 2024) complained about the slogan “make America great again” and Trump’s movement supposedly becoming “a movement of a bunch of dorks.”

“A lot of them are these really weird, f–––ing uninteresting, unintelligent people,” Rogan said, before griping that some “genuine patriots” in the movement get “lumped into this one group” with the “dorks.” The critique isn’t all that different from the one Hillary Clinton made about a decade ago, when she referred to some people in the movement as a “basket of deplorables” who espoused bigotry.

Rogan also argued that former President Barack Obama was more effective in deporting people than Trump has been.

Vance took umbrage with both claims during an interview with far-right propagandist Benny Johnson last week. The vice president said he would text Rogan to rebut the claims, but on the topic of MAGA “dorks,” Vance said, “We have many, many fewer dorks than the far left. But we love our dorks. We love our cool kids. We love anybody who wants to save the country.”

🚨NEW: JD Vance issues a direct response to Joe Rogan calling Trump supporters “dorks”

“We have many, MANY fewer dorks than the far-left! But we LOVE our dorks. We love our cool kids. We love anybody who wants to save the country.”pic.twitter.com/DOPgCRvA5A

— Jack (@jackunheard) March 27, 2026

Is it puerile that two conservative thought leaders were seriously discussing whether the so-called dorks could sit with them at lunch? Absolutely.

But it also speaks to the superficiality of the MAGA movement, which perceives “coolness” as a very real political currency. And one that Trump appears to be losing rapidly among some noteworthy constituents.

Ja’han Jones is an MS NOW opinion blogger. He previously wrote The ReidOut Blog.

Read More

Continue Reading

The Dictatorship

Trump reportedly includes Elon Musk in phone meeting with foreign leader (again)

Published

on

Trump reportedly includes Elon Musk in phone meeting with foreign leader (again)

As the war in Iran begins its second month, it stands to reason that Donald Trump would have quite a bit to talk about during his latest phone meeting with Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi. There was no obvious reason why the American president would include Elon Musk in the call, but according to The New York Timesthat’s precisely what happened:

Elon Musk participated in a phone call on Tuesday with President Trump and Prime Minister Narendra Modi of India, an unusual appearance by a private citizen on a call between two heads of state during a wartime crisis. […]

It is unclear why Mr. Musk was on the call or whether he spoke. … The call, American and Indian officials have said, was about the escalating crisis in the Middle East, and in particular the Iranian military’s control of the Strait of Hormuz, which is critical for the shipping of oil and gas around the globe.

None of the relevant players responded to the Times’ request for comment, and the reporting has not been independently verified by MS NOW.

That said, if the account is accurate, it would suggest that the rift between the president and his top 2024 campaign donor has been resolved and that Musk is no longer on the outs with Team Trump.

But more important is the substantive element: Why in the world would the American president agree to let a private citizen join a sensitive call with a key foreign leader about an ongoing war?

More to the point, why would Trump do this again?

During the Republican’s pre-inaugural transition period, Trump did this quite a bit:

About a year and a half later, it’s apparently happening again.

The New Republic noted“There is literally no rational justification for including the world’s richest man on a call between two national leaders during a global crisis.”

If Trump has a defense for such a move, I’m eager to hear it.

This post updates our related earlier coverage.

Steve Benen is a producer for “The Rachel Maddow Show,” the editor of MaddowBlog and an MS NOW political contributor. He’s also the bestselling author of “Ministry of Truth: Democracy, Reality, and the Republicans’ War on the Recent Past.”

Read More

Continue Reading

The Dictatorship

Key Democrats probe report Hegseth blocked promotions for women, Black officers

Published

on

Key Democrats probe report Hegseth blocked promotions for women, Black officers

On personnel matters, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth hasn’t exactly earned the benefit of the doubt. Last year, for example, the beleaguered Pentagon chief replaced so many women in military leadership roles that The Atlantic’s Tom Nichols noted“At this point, women have been cleared out of all of the military’s top jobs. … Some observers might see a pattern here. Discerning this pattern does not exactly require Columbo-level sleuthing.”

On matters of race, the former Fox News host’s record isn’t any better. After all, Hegseth prioritized placing a portrait of Gen. Robert E. Lee (which includes a slave guiding the Confederate general’s horse) in the West Point library, which came on the heels of reinstalling a racist Confederate memorial that was removed from Arlington National Cemetery in 2023.

Hegseth also helped push out Gen. Charles Q. Brown Jr., the second Black man to serve as chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and helped create a leadership team in which the chairman and the vice chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, all five service chiefs and nine of the military’s 10 combatant commanders are white men.

Late last week, however, these concerns reached a striking new level. The New York Times reported:

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth is blocking the promotion of four Army officers to be one-star generals, a highly unusual move that has prompted some senior military officials to question whether the officers are being singled out because of their race or gender.

Two of the officers targeted by Mr. Hegseth are Black and two are women on a promotion list that consists of about three dozen officers, most of whom are white men, senior military officials said.

According to the Times’ report, which has not been independently verified by MS NOW, Hegseth spent months lobbying military officials, including Army Secretary Daniel Driscoll, to remove the officers’ names, only to face institutional pushback.

Earlier this month, the defense secretary acted unilaterally and struck the officers’ names from the promotion list, despite concerns he lacked the legal authority to take such a step.

“It is exceedingly rare that a one-star list draws such intense scrutiny from a defense secretary,” the Times added. “The battle highlights the bitter rifts opened by Mr. Hegseth’s campaign to reverse policies that he says are prejudiced against white officers.”

A Pentagon spokesperson said on the record that the promotions process within the department is “apolitical and unbiased,” but Sen. Jack Reed of Rhode Island, the top Democrat on the Senate Armed Services Committee, wasn’t impressed with that denial.

“Two years ago, this committee codified in law longstanding practice and tradition that accessions and promotions within the military services be based on ‘individual merit and demonstrated performance,’” Reed said in a statement. “If these reports are accurate, Secretary Hegseth’s decision to remove four decorated officers from a promotion list after having been selected by their peers for their merit and performance is not only outrageous, it would be illegal. Denying the promotions of individual officers based on their race or gender would betray every principle of merit-based service military officers uphold throughout their careers.

“Sadly, this would not be surprising. These are currently allegations, but they fit a pattern when it comes to this secretary. He has fired or sidelined dozens of generals and admirals without explanation, the majority of whom are women or persons of color. Today, every service chief and nearly every combatant commander is a white man.

“These officers have given decades of exemplary service to this nation. They deserve better, and so do the American people. I am looking into this matter to ensure that the law is followed.”

The leaders of the Democratic Women’s Caucus and the Congressional Black Caucus issued related criticisms in a joint statement.

“We’ve long known that Pete Hegseth is an unfit and unqualified secretary of defense appointed by Trump. So it is absurd, ironic and beyond inappropriate that he of all people would deny these promotions to officers with records of exemplary service,” said Democratic Reps. Teresa Leger Fernández of New Mexico and Yvette Clarke of New York.

We probably haven’t heard the last of this. The Pentagon’s promotion list is now in the hands of the White House, which will seek final approval from the Senate. Watch this space.

Steve Benen is a producer for “The Rachel Maddow Show,” the editor of MaddowBlog and an MS NOW political contributor. He’s also the bestselling author of “Ministry of Truth: Democracy, Reality, and the Republicans’ War on the Recent Past.”

Read More

Continue Reading

Trending