Connect with us

Congress

Capitol agenda: Senate shutdown deal hits a Lindsey Graham snag

Published

on

A partial shutdown of multiple federal agencies is just 16 hours away as the Senate deals with a Lindsey Graham-sized snag and House Republicans face pressure from President Donald Trump to expedite whatever the other chamber sends their way.

Here’s the latest on the stop-start drama around the government funding deal:

— Graham’s revenge: It sure seemed like the Senate was ready to vote Thursday night after Trump and Democrats struck a compromise — enactment of five of the full-year appropriations bills and a two-week Homeland Security stopgap — to buy time for both sides to negotiate new guardrails for the administration’s immigration enforcement activities after the fatal shooting of Alex Pretti in Minneapolis.

Then Graham made his move. He refused to go along with the plan over a House-backed provision that would repeal a law allowing senators to receive cash payouts if they had phone records seized by former special counsel Jack Smith — the South Carolina Republican included.

The Senate could move ahead as soon as Friday, though there are currently no votes on the schedule as leadership works to resolve holdups. Senate Majority Leader John Thune said there were issues coming from members of both parties, though Graham appears to be the main problem.

“Hopefully by sometime tomorrow we’ll be in a better spot,” Thune said leaving the Capitol Thursday night. “Tomorrow’s another day, and hopefully people will be in a spirit to try and get this done.”

— What’s next in the House: Assuming the Senate can send a funding package across the Capitol in short order, House GOP leaders are planning for a vote in their chamber as soon as Monday. Though if Trump wants a shorter partial shutdown, he could pressure Speaker Mike Johnson to call his members back earlier.

Rules Republicans will hold a call with Chair Virginia Foxx (R-N.C.) at 9 a.m. Friday to discuss the process for bringing the revised funding package to the House floor. Then, the full House GOP conference will hold another call at 11 a.m., during which leaders are expected to try and rally support, according to three people granted anonymity to discuss private plans.

They’re likely to get an earful from hard-liners, who opposed separating DHS out from the larger funding package from the start and don’t want to negotiate with Democrats on restricting Trump’s deportation agenda.

Other Republicans could cause problems with their own eleventh-hour wish lists. Rep. Anna Paulina Luna (R-Fla.) is insisting the House amend the appropriations package to tack on the SAVE AMERICA Act, which would require proof of citizenship when registering to vote. That would require sending the funding legislation back to the Senate yet again, further prolonging a shutdown.

GOP leaders were already talking with some House Republican factions Thursday night about the funding deal in an effort to get members on board ahead of what’s expected to be a party-line procedural rule vote — and they’ll soon only have a one-vote margin majority.

If enough hard-liners hold up the bill during that vote, GOP leaders might look to pass it via suspension, which requires a two-thirds affirmative vote of members present.

— What that means for the DHS bill: Should the DHS stopgap make its way to Trump, two weeks could prove to be a tight window to sort through a host of tough asks from members who want to put their stamp on the full-year funding bill. Graham, for instance, is pushing for his bill to end sanctuary cities to be included in the revamped DHS measure.

Some Republicans are bracing for the possibility of another weeks-long funding patch for DHS if a deal isn’t reached by mid-February, with Sen. John Kennedy (R-La.) predicting that “part of the government is just going to stay shut down” indefinitely.

But Republicans’ biggest fear is it could all end with Democrats jamming the GOP with their demands, which include tighter warrant rules, a ban on masks and a requirement for body cameras and independent investigations.

What else we’re watching:   

— Johnson’s margin narrows: This Saturday’s special election runoff in Texas between two Democrats vying to fill the seat left vacant by late-Rep. Sylvester Turner will cut further into Johnson’s already-tiny margin — and House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries is warning the speaker not to delay the winner’s swearing-in.

Whoever wins the seat — either Amanda Edwards or Christian Menefee — will, once seated, bring the balance of the House to 218-214. When that happens, Johnson will only be able to afford a single defection on party-line votes, which could be especially critical next week assuming government funding legislation heads back to the House.

Meredith Lee Hill and Calen Razor contributed to this report.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Congress

Al Green, Menefee head to runoff in member-on-member Democratic primary

Published

on

Texas Democratic Reps. Al Green and Christian Menefee are headed to a runoff, extending a member-on-member matchup defined by the latest fight over generational change.

Neither Green, 78, or Menefee, 37, earned a majority of votes in the newly drawn Houston 18th District resulting from Texas Republicans’ recent gerrymander of the state’s congressional map.

Green, a civil rights icon, jumped into the race after his former district was scrambled by the GOP’s redistricting. The matchup comes as the Democratic Party is engaged in an intense debate about whether the old guard should step aside and make room for a younger generation of leaders.

Green, who was first elected to Congress in 2004, has long represented the Houston area. He was the first Democrat to introduce articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump — long before most other House Democrats were on board — and famously protested his addresses to Congress.

Just weeks ago, Menefee had won a special election in an overlapping district to serve out the remainder of the late, former Rep. Sylvester Turner’s term.

Continue Reading

Congress

John Thune urges Trump to endorse John Cornyn ‘early’

Published

on

Senate Majority Leader John Thune urged President Donald Trump on Wednesday to deliver a swift endorsement of Texas Sen. John Cornyn to potentially forestall what is widely expected to be an expensive and nasty primary runoff against Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton.

Thune told reporters he hasn’t yet spoken to Trump since the election returns from Tuesday’s primary came in but indicated he intends to personally redouble his efforts, saying Wednesday that “hopefully” the president will give Cornyn his influential nod.

“[If] Trump endorses early, it saves everybody a lot of money, and … 10 weeks of a spirited campaign on our side that keeps us from spending time focusing on the Democrats,” Thune said.

“If the president can weigh in it would be enormously helpful,” he added.

Thune and other Senate Republicans have been trying to nudge Trump for months to endorse Cornyn, who acknowledged last month that he didn’t expect the president to weigh in before Tuesday night’s election. The runoff is set for May 26, with the winner to face Democrat James Talarico, who avoided his own runoff Tuesday.

Other Senate Republicans are also expected to renew their case for Cornyn to Trump after the four-term veteran exceeded expectations Tuesday.

“I would encourage the president to endorse him,” Senate Majority Whip John Barrasso said Wednesday, arguing that Cornyn has the best shot of winning in November.

As of Wednesday morning, Cornyn is narrowly leading Paxton with 94 percent of the votes counted, according to the Associated Press. Many polls had Cornyn trailing Paxton ahead of Election Day.

Thune called it a “great night” for Cornyn. Other allies of the Texas Republican who were granted anonymity to speak candidly said his performance Tuesday means, in their view, a Trump endorsement is still a possibility.

Continue Reading

Congress

Tim Walz accuses the Trump administration of singling out Minnesota amid fraud allegations, immigration crackdown

Published

on

Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz told lawmakers Wednesday that his state has been terrorized by the Trump administration over mass welfare fraud allegations, pointing to the killing of U.S. citizens in the midst of an immigration enforcement surge around Minneapolis.

“Let me be clear: In Minnesota, if you defraud public programs, if you steal taxpayer money, we’ll find you, we’ll prosecute you, we’ll convict you, and we’ll throw you in jail,” the Democrat said in his opening remarks at a hearing before the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee.

But, he added, “the people of Minnesota have been singled out and targeted for political retribution at an unparalleled scale, including blocking Medicaid reimbursements to our state just last week.”

Walz, the 2024 nominee for vice president, is fending off accusations from congressional Republicans that he didn’t do enough to prevent a scandal that has embroiled his state. Prosecutors have charged more than 90 people with defrauding the government, and two individuals connected to the Minnesota nonprofit Feeding Our Future were convicted of stealing federal nutrition funds in March.

The revelations have led the Trump administration to take drastic, punitive measures, such as prompting the Department of Health and Human Services to freeze its child care funding and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services to cancel hundreds of millions in Medicaid money.

Walz, alongside Minnesota’s Democratic attorney general, Keith Ellison, have been hauled to Capitol Hill to testify before the committee about the scandal — and also to respond to an interim report committee Republicans released early Wednesday morning alleging that Walz and Ellison “knew about the fraud in federal programs administered by the State of Minnesota much earlier than they told the American people.”

House Oversight Chair James Comer (R-Ky.) asked why Walz did not order the stop or suspend welfare program payments, despite warnings of fraud.

“We’re not going to stop payments to feed children until we have the proof that things happen,” Walz said.

Comer objected: “You didn’t stop payments because you didn’t want to rock the boat.”

In his opening statement, Ellison maintained that his office has pursued fraud convictions aggressively where it has the jurisdiction to do so.

Republicans have honed in on the welfare scandal as an opportunity to disparage the state’s Democratic leadership, but it also has fueled anti-immigrant rhetoric within the GOP — specifically against Minnesota’s large Somali community. At one point, House Judiciary Committee Chair Jim Jordan, who is also a member of the Oversight panel, asked Walz whether he knew how many of those indicted have been Somali-American.

“We don’t investigate or prosecute people based on ethnicity, religion—,” Walz said, before Jordan interrupted him.

“Neither do I, we shouldn’t do that,” Jordan responded. “85 percent of the people indicted were Somali-American, a key voting bloc, and I think that’s what drove this whole thing.”

The White House quickly amplified video of the exchange on X.

Democrats on the committee are using the opportunity to criticize the administration’s aggressive immigration enforcement agenda. The panel’s ranking member, Rep. Robert Garcia of California, pointed to a large poster of Renee Good’s bloody driver seat, after she was shot by ICE agents in January.

“This violence does not make us safer,” Garcia said. “It does not address fraud, waste, and abuse. It doesn’t help families with healthcare … And it certainly as we’re continuing to discuss, is not preventing the kind of fraud that Republicans are discussing here today.”

Continue Reading

Trending