Connect with us

The Dictatorship

After Alex Pretti’s killing, federal immigration agents must adopt these four reforms

Published

on

ByCedric Alexander

After a Ferguson, Missouri, police officer killed teenaged resident Michael Brown in August 2014 and the 21st Century Task Force on Policing was formed, across the United States, a foundational principle of policing emerged: Any agency involved in a shooting incident must consent to a thorough, unbiased and transparent investigation conducted by an independent outside entity. This principle exists to maintain what the task force identified as the three pillars of policing in a democracy: trust, integrity and legitimacy.

Federal agents have effectively been granted immunity from this standard.

Yet as we saw after immigration agents shot dead 37-year-old Alex Pretti in Minneapolis on Saturday, Trump administration officials have largely been acting as if federal immigration agents have immunity from this standardcreating a dangerous two-tiered system of accountability where federal officers operate above the scrutiny applied to their state and local counterparts.

The only information we have regarding the two agents involved in Pretti’s death comes from a Department of Homeland Security official who spoke to MS NOW on the condition of anonymity and said, per Border Patrol’s policy, they were placed on paid administrative leave for three days and met with a mental health professional. That source also said they’ll be placed on desk duty pending an internal investigation. But we have reasons to worry about the integrity of that investigation.

I have devoted my entire professional life, more than four decades, to public safety and law enforcement, and I view the killing of Pretti, an intensive care unit nurse at a VA hospital, as a critical inflection point for democracy, decency and law enforcement in the U.S. It is a moment of reckoning, and if it isn’t adequately addressed, it threatens to tear down more than a decade of hard-won progress in police-community relations.

Videos of immigration agents shooting Pretti reveal agents who are, at best, grossly undertrained and poorly supervised, conducting operations with a level of recklessness that is unconscionable — indeed, unthinkable — in professional law enforcement. Reports indicate that federal agents closed off the crime scene to state and local investigatorscontaminated evidence and removed witnesses, including those officers who were at the scene of the shootingout of state. These actions are at odds with long-established and, at least since the aforementioned Michael Brown case, universally accepted investigative protocols.

Moving forward, the federal government must implement four essential reforms related to independent investigations, standardized training, increased supervision and scene preservation.

These actions are at odds with universally accepted investigative protocol.

Though the federal government ought to have a role in investigating shootings that involve federal agents, the first thing we need is a policy that mandates that any such shooting also be investigated by an independent state or county agency, working in partnership with federal investigators where appropriate.

This investigation must be credible, legitimate, transparent and conducted in a nonpartisan manner. That last part is particularly crucial given the current political climate. The investigating body must have unfettered access to the scene, evidence and witnesses from the moment an incident occurs. In the present case, law enforcement officials in Minnesota have said that the federal government has blocked their efforts to investigate Pretti’s killing.

Second, federal law enforcement agencies must adopt the same standards of accountability that have been implemented at state and local levels since the 21st Century Task Force report. This includes comprehensive use-of-force policies, de-escalation training, body-worn camera requirements with strict protocols for activation and preservation of footage and robust systems for tracking and reviewing officer-involved shootings.

Third, we need stringent training and supervision requirements for all federal agents engaged in enforcement activities — particularly among officers and agents conducting street-level operations for which they may lack adequate preparation. The current practice of deploying undertrained agents for complex enforcement actions, including operations involving moving vehicles and populated areas, must end immediately.

Fourth, the federal government must implement immediate scene preservation protocols that prohibit federal agents from excluding state and local authorities from crime scenes within their normal jurisdictions. The reported withholding of evidence from state and local officials, the apparent contamination of evidence and Border Patrol’s admission that it shielded and sent away an officer who shot Pretti cannot be tolerated. Federal law enforcement must be subject to accountability and the most serious consequences specified in law, including potential obstruction-of-justice charges.

Federal law enforcement must be subject to accountability.

The stakes could not be higher. Every incident like the Pretti shooting and the shooting of Renee Nicole Good before it further de-legitimizes federal law enforcement and erodes the painstaking progress made since the Brown case in Ferguson.

The choice before federal leadership is clear: Embrace accountability and transparency through meaningful reform, or continue down a path of ruthlessness and criminal misrepresentation that threatens not only public safety, but the very fabric of legitimate governance. The American people deserve — and the Constitution demands — nothing less than law enforcement that operates under the rule of law, regardless of whether those officers wear local, state or federal badges.

Cedric Alexander

Cedric Alexander, a former commissioner of community safety in Minneapolis, is a law enforcement expert with over 40 years of experience in public safety. Alexander has also been deputy commissioner of the New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services and an assistant professor at the University of Rochester department of psychiatry. He is a former national president of the National Organization of Black Law Enforcement Executives (NOBLE). He is the author of “The New Guardians: Policing in America’s Communities for the 21st Century” and “In Defense of Public Service: How 22 Million Government Workers Will Save Our Republic.”

Read More

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Dictatorship

Trump says he will announce his Federal Reserve pick on Friday

Published

on

Trump says he will announce his Federal Reserve pick on Friday

WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump said he plans to announce his choice for chairman of the Federal Reserve on Friday morning, a long-awaited decision that could set up a showdown on whether the U.S. central bank preserves its independence from the White House and electoral politics.

For the past year, the president has aggressively attacked Fed Chair Jerome Powell, whose term as the head of the U.S. central bank ends in May. Trump maintains that Powell should cut the Fed’s benchmark interest rates more drastically to fuel faster economic growth, while the Fed chair has taken a far more judicious approach in the wake of Trump’s tariffs because inflation is already elevated.

“I’ll be announcing the Fed chair tomorrow morning,” Trump told reporters Thursday night as he went into a screening of the documentary “Melania” about his wife. “It’s going to be, somebody that is very respected, somebody that’s known to everybody in the financial world. And I think it’s going to be a very good choice. I hope so.”

Trump stayed relatively cryptic about his pick. His search was led by Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent with four known finalists: Kevin Warsh, a former Fed governor; Christopher Waller, a current Fed governor; Rick Rieder, an executive with the financial firm BlackRock; and Kevin Hassett, director of the White House National Economic Council. Trump previously suggested Hassett was the frontrunner, only to recently say that he wanted him to remain in his current post.

Trump did say on Thursday night that “a lot of people think that this is somebody that could have been there a few years ago,” fueling speculation that he had chosen Warsh, who was a finalist in the 2017 search for Fed chair that led to Powell’s selection.

Tensions between Trump and the central bank had been steadily mounting as the president used the renovation costs of the Fed’s headquarters to further lambaste Powell, a campaign that resulted in the Fed getting subpoenas from the Justice Department earlier this month. The Fed chair took the rare step of issuing a video statement in which he said, “The threat of criminal charges is a consequence of the Federal Reserve setting interest rates based on our best assessment of what will serve the public, rather than following the preferences of the president.”

Trump has long teased his Fed choice while saying his nominee would slash interest rates that influence the supply of money in the U.S. economy, the rate of inflation and the stability of the job market.

On the cusp of Trump’s announcement, Powell might have the ability to block him in an effort to ensure the Fed preserves its credibility by staying away from political considerations.

While his term as chair ends in roughly three months, Powell’s term on the Fed’s board of governors runs through 2028 and he could choose to remain in that post, likely blocking Trump’s ability to have his nominees control the majority of the seats on the board. Of the seven Fed governors, former President Joe Biden picked three of them in addition to renominating Powell to a second term as chair.

If Powell stays on the board, he could also create a small procedural hurdle for Trump’s ability to nominate someone new to the board. This would mean Trump would either have to choose an existing board member as chair or replace Stephen Miran, who is on leave from his job as chair of the White House Council of Economic Advisers to fill a term as governor that technically ends on Saturday. If Trump chooses to replace Miran, he could name someone new to the board.

At a Wednesday news conference, Powell declined to say whether he would leave the board. But he did offer some advice to any successor about balancing the need for independent judgment with public accountability.

“Don’t get pulled into elected politics — don’t do it,” Powell said. “Another is, that our window into democratic accountability is Congress. And it’s not a passive burden for us to go to Congress and talk to people. It’s an affirmative regular obligation.”

Read More

Continue Reading

The Dictatorship

Trump threatens tariffs on any country selling oil to Cuba

Published

on

Trump threatens tariffs on any country selling oil to Cuba

WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump on Thursday signed an executive order that would impose a tariff on any goods from countries that sell or provide oil to Cuba, a move that could further cripple an island plagued by a deepening energy crisis.

The order would primarily put pressure on Mexico, a government that has acted as an oil lifeline for Cuba and has constantly voiced solidarity for the U.S. adversary even as Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum has sought to build a strong relationship with Trump.

Trump was asked by a reporter Thursday whether he was trying to “choke off” Cuba, which he called a “failing nation.”

“The word ‘choke off’ is awfully tough,” Trump said. “I’m not trying to, but, it looks like it’s something that’s just not going to be able to survive.”

Cuban Foreign Minister Bruno Rodríguez and a number of other Cuban officials condemned Trump’s executive order. Rodríguez called it a “brutal act of aggression against Cuba and its people … who are now threatened with being subjected to extreme living conditions.”

He accused the U.S. of resorting to “blackmail and coercion to try to force other countries to join its universally condemned blockade policy against Cuba.”

Cuba relies on allies for energy

This week has been marked by speculation that Mexico would slash oil shipments to Cuba under mounting pressure by Trump to distance itself from the Cuban government.

In its deepening energy and economic crisis, fueled in part by strict economic sanctions by the U.S., Cuba has relied heavily on foreign assistance and oil shipments from allies like Mexico, Russia and Venezuela before a U.S. military operation ousted former Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro.

Since the Venezuela operation, Trump has said no more Venezuelan oil will go to Cuba and the Cuban government is ready to fall.

In its most recent report, Mexico’s state-owned oil company Pemex said it shipped nearly 20,000 barrels of oil per day to Cuba from January through Sept. 30, 2025. That month, U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio visited Mexico City. Afterward, Jorge Piñon, an expert at the University of Texas Energy Institute who tracks shipments using satellite technology, said the figure had fallen to about 7,000 barrels.

Uncertainty simmers in Mexico

Sheinbaum has been incredibly vague about where her country stood, and this week has given roundabout and ambiguous answers to inquiries about the shipments, and dodged reporters questions in her morning press briefings.

On Tuesday, Sheinbaum said Pemex had at least temporarily paused some oil shipments to Cuba. But she struck an ambiguous tone, saying the pause was part of general fluctuations in oil supplies and a “sovereign decision” not made under pressure from the U.S. Sheinbaum has said Mexico would continue to show solidarity with Havana, but didn’t clarify what kind of support Mexico would offer.

On Wednesday, the Latin American leader claimed she never said Mexico has completely “suspended” shipments and “humanitarian aid” to Cuba would continue and decisions about shipments to Cuba were determined by Pemex contracts.

“So the contract determines when shipments are sent and when they are not sent,” Sheinbaum said.

Trump and Sheinbaum spoke by phone Thursday morning. Sheinbaum said they did not discuss Cuba.

“We didn’t address the issue of Cuba,” Sheinbaum said, adding that Mexico’s foreign affairs secretary had discussed with U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio that it was “very important” for Mexico to maintain its humanitarian aid to Cuba and Mexico was willing to serve as an intermediary between the U.S. and Cuba.

‘Under threat of tariff coercion’

The lack of clarity from the leader has underscored the extreme pressure Mexico and other Latin American nations are under as Trump has grown more confrontational following the Venezuelan operation.

It remains unclear what the Thursday order by Trump will mean for Cuba, which has been roiled by crisis for years and a U.S. embargo. Anxieties were already simmering on the Caribbean island as many drivers sat in long lines this week for gasoline, many unsure of what would come next.

On Cuban state television, commentator Jorge Legañoa, who usually expresses views aligned with the government, asserted “Cuba was not a threat,” but rather that the island’s authorities were fighting gangs and preventing regional drug trafficking with their zero-tolerance policy.

Cuban Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs Carlos F. de Cossio wrote on social media platform X that the U.S. is tightening its Cuban blockade after “the failure of decades of relentless economic warfare” and attempting to “force sovereign states to join the embargo.”

“Under threat of tariff coercion, they must decide whether to forgo their right to export their own fuel to Cuba,” he wrote.

___

Janesky reported from Mexico City. Andrea Rodríguez and Danica said.

Read More

Continue Reading

The Dictatorship

Trump threatens Canada with 50% tariff on aircraft sold in US

Published

on

Trump threatens Canada with 50% tariff on aircraft sold in US

WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump on Thursday threatened Canada with a 50% tariff on any aircraft sold in the U.S., the latest salvo in his trade war with America’s northern neighbor as his feud with Prime Minister Mark Carney expands.

Trump’s threat posted on social media came after he threatened over the weekend to impose a 100% tariff on goods imported from Canada if it went forward with a planned trade deal with China. But Trump’s threat did not come with any details about when he would impose the import taxes, as Canada had already struck a deal.

In Trump’s latest threat, the Republican president said he was retaliating against Canada for refusing to certify jets from Savannah, Georgia-based Gulfstream Aerospace.

Trump said the U.S., in return, would decertify all Canadian aircraft, including planes from its largest aircraft maker, Bombardier. “If, for any reason, this situation is not immediately corrected, I am going to charge Canada a 50% Tariff on any and all Aircraft sold into the United States of America,” Trump said in his post.

Trump said he is “hereby decertifying” the Bombardier Global Express business jets. There are 150 Global Express aircraft in service registered in the U.S., operated by 115 operators, according to Cirium, the aviation analytics company.

Bombardier and Gulfstream are head-to-head rivals, with the Global series battling for market share against Gulfstream’s latest models.

Bombardier said in a statement that it has taken note of the president’s post and is in contact with the Canadian government. The Montreal-based company said its aircraft are fully certified to Federal Aviation Administration standards and it is expanding U.S operations.

“Thousands of private and civilian jets built in Canada fly in the U.S. every day. We hope this is quickly resolved to avoid a significant impact to air traffic and the flying public,” the company said.

Spokespeople for the Canadian government didn’t respond to messages seeking comment Thursday evening.

John Gradek, who teaches aviation management at McGill University, said certification is about safety and it would be unprecedented to decertify for trade reasons.

“Certification is not trivial. It is a very important step in getting planes to operate safely,” Gradek said. “Somebody is not picking on the Gulfstream. Decertification for trade reasons does not happen.”

Gradek said many Gulfstreams have been certified for years in Canada.

“This is really a smokescreen that’s basically throwing up another red flag in the face of Mr. Carney,” Gradek said. “This is taking it to the extreme. This is a new salvo in the trade war.”

The U.S. Commerce Department previously put duties on a Bombardier commercial passenger jet in 2017 during the first Trump administration, charging that the Canadian company was selling the planes in America below cost. The U.S. said then that Bombardier used unfair government subsidies to sell jets at artificially low prices.

The U.S. International Trade Commission in Washington later ruled that Bombardier did not injure U.S. industry.

Bombardier has since concentrated on the business and private jet market in its Global and Challenger families of planes. Both are popular with individual owners and businesses as well as fractional jet companies like NetJets and Flexjet. If Trump cuts off the U.S. market it would be a major blow to the Quebec company.

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent warned Carney on Wednesday that his recent public comments against U.S. trade policy could backfire going into the formal review of the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement, the trade deal that protects Canada from the heaviest impacts of Trump’s tariffs.

Carney rejected Bessent’s contention that he had aggressively walked back his comments at the World Economic Forum during a phone call with Trump on Monday.

Carney said he told Trump that he meant what he said in his speech at Davos, and told him Canada plans to diversify away from the United States with a dozen new trade deals.

In Davos at the World Economic Forum last week, Carney condemned economic coercion by great powers on smaller countries without mentioning Trump’s name. The prime minister received widespread praise and attention for his remarks, upstaging Trump at the gathering.

Besides Bombadier, other major aircraft manufacturers in Canada include De Havilland Aircraft of Canada, which makes turboprop planes and aircraft designed for maritime patrols and reconnaissance, and European aerospace giant Airbus. Airbus manufactures its single-aisle A220 commercial planes and helicopters in Canada.

___

Gillies contributed to this report from Toronto. AP writers Lisa Leff and Josh Funk contributed to this report.

Read More

Continue Reading

Trending