Connect with us

The Dictatorship

A senator told the FBI to go after Texas Democrats. And then what?

Published

on

A senator told the FBI to go after Texas Democrats. And then what?

How do you prevent tyranny and preserve liberty? The framers of the U.S. Constitution set themselves this task when they convened nearly 240 years ago. Their solution — creating formally independent branches of government — rested on the assumption that a restless desire for power was an immovable fixture of human nature. By vesting shared powers in the rival branches like the president’s veto on legislation and Congress’ role in approving executive nominees and control over spending, they thought they could force the branches into conflict if any of them sought to impose its will on the others, or the country.

The abdications of the Republican Congress and conservativeSupreme Court in the past seven months have thoroughly discredited the framers’ assumption about human nature. Partisanship has proved more powerful than the separation of powers.

Presidents this historically unpopular would expect to see dramatic losses in Congress in any free and fair election.

So, it should not surprise us that the last remnant of the Constitution’s system of checks and balances is the one that remains partly in Democratic hands: state governments. The independent authority of state governments enshrined in the Constitution, which enables them to legitimately contest federal power, is what political scientists and legal scholars call federalism. Now it appears that Trump is seeking to extend his successful subversion of Congress and the Supreme Court to overcome federalism as well.

The president’s recent demand that Texas and other Republican-controlled states engage in an irregular mid-decade redistricting effort is an unprecedented incursion into state authority. In Texas, Trump aims to transmute five House seats held by Democrats into five that Republicans could win handily in 2026. Given the chamber’s narrow margin, these five seats alone could determine who controls the House after the midterm elections — regardless of who gets more votes.

This is the key to the entire plot. The president’s party usually loses seats in midterm elections. The Democratic lead on the generic ballot is currently small, but likely large enough to overcome Republicans’ razor-thin majority in the House. Trump is already the most unpopular modern president at this point in a new term — other than himself at this time in his first term. In fact, he is currently more unpopular than he was on the eve of the 2018 midterm election, in which his party lost control of the House. Presidents this historically unpopular would expect to see dramatic losses in Congress in any free and fair election.

But after his loss in the 2020 election and the insurrection of Jan. 6, 2021, Trump seems determined not to allow apparent election losses to again obstruct his power. Though gerrymandering is nearly as old as the United States, Trump is the first president to attempt a nationwide effort to secure his party control of the House by gerrymandering immediately before the election. In the context of the Congress and Supreme Court’s surrender to Trump and his record of election denial, this is best understood as an effort to secure what can only be characterized as autocratic control over all of American government.

Trump is seeking to shield himself from the will of the voters by having his allies redraw legislative districts. It is a familiar strategy of authoritarian governments that seek to masquerade as robust democracies. They change the rules of electoral competition to favor their allies and make it unfairly or impossibly difficult for the opposition to win power.

Trump is seeking to shield himself from the will of the voters by having his allies redraw legislative districts.

None of this is lost on the Texas Democratic legislators who fled the state to prevent the redistricting plan from going through, or the Democratic governors supporting them. California’s Gavin Newsom has clearly signaled he understands the stakes. In a meeting with some of the Texas Democrats, he said, “Donald Trump called up [Texas] Gov. Abbott for one simple reason: to rig the 2026 election.” He characterized the redistricting effort as an “undemocratic” effort to keep Trump in power without meaningful congressional oversight.

New York Gov. Kathy Hochul said the effort was “nothing less than a legal insurrection” and that “if Republicans are willing to rewrite the rules to give themselves an advantage, then they’re leaving us no choice. We must do the same.”

Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker has probably been the most aggressive of the Democratic governors supporting the Texas legislators, promising not only to house them but also to shield them from potential arrest by federal agents. Though it is unclear how serious that danger is, Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas, said the FBI had agreed to assist in their return and Trump said the FBI “may have to” go get them.

It thus seems that the Texas gerrymander effort and the resulting flight of the state’s Democratic lawmakers may lead to a face-off between a Democratic-controlled state government, or several of them, and federal officials helping to indirectly carry out Trump’s gerrymandering directive. Moreover, all three governors, as well as state legislators in Marylandhave signaled a willingness to consider unprecedented (and often technically difficult) redistricting efforts in their own states to counter Trump’s push. This is federalism in dramatic form.

These governors are signaling that American federalism will not be overthrown as easily as the Congress and Supreme Court. It is impossible to predict how all this will be resolved, but there is considerable reason to think these states will not abjectly surrender like congressional Republicans or the Roberts Court. There’s still a fight to be had here. Thankfully for the Constitution, these Democrats seem willing to have it.

Kevin J. Elliott

Kevin J. Elliott is a political scientist at Yale University and the author of “Democracy for Busy People.” He teaches and does research on democratic theory, comparative institutional design, and the history of political and economic thought.

Read More

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Dictatorship

NEW: Several European leaders to join Zelenskyy at White House meeting Monday

Published

on

NEW: Several European leaders to join Zelenskyy at White House meeting Monday
  • Dem Rep. calls out Trump team for doing damage control after Putin summit

    06:52

  • Why a land swap in Ukraine’s Donbas has more nuance to it than Trump thinks

    08:50

  • Trump floats land swap in Ukraine with allies seeing it as a non-starter for a peace deal

    10:32

  • Epstein survivor shares stark reminder to parents on why Ghislaine Maxwell deserves her sentence

    08:08

  • Ukraine safety remains unclear as Trump teases U.S. pledge of security guarantees

    07:35

  •  Why Trump’s rewriting of history at the Smithsonian should concern you

    04:27

  • Now Playing

  • UP NEXT

    Texas Gov. Abbott blasted for special session on gerrymandering failing again

    03:55

  • Ukraine war no closer to an end after Trump-Putin summit: Fmr. Ambassador to Ukraine

    10:20

  • Fmr. Amb. to Ukraine reacts to NYT reporting Trump backs Ukraine giving up land

    11:05

  • The stock market-economy dynamic that’s baffling economists

    04:19

  • How flattery plays a role in Trump’s foreign affairs after Putin summit

    06:47

  • Do Democrats have anything to lose in using Republican gerrymandering tactics against them?

    06:08

  • NEW: Trump floats U.S., NATO-like security guarantees for Ukraine as part of Russia peace deal

    03:10

  • Texas Governor warns protesting Democrats they’ll be arrested if they return to the state

    04:53

  • Former DNC Chair calls for a resilient Congress to take charge against gerrymandering efforts

    06:34

  • Vice President Vance denies Epstein was discussed at White House strategy meeting

    08:46

  • Trump has made concessions to Putin already before Ukraine summit: Fmr. CIA official

    06:37

  • Are CEOs currying favor with Trump through lavish gifts and flattery?

    05:29

  • Texas Democrats face arrest and bomb threats amid their standoff with Republican gerrymandering

    06:26

  • UP NEXT

    Dem Rep. calls out Trump team for doing damage control after Putin summit

    06:52

  • Why a land swap in Ukraine’s Donbas has more nuance to it than Trump thinks

    08:50

  • Trump floats land swap in Ukraine with allies seeing it as a non-starter for a peace deal

    10:32

  • Epstein survivor shares stark reminder to parents on why Ghislaine Maxwell deserves her sentence

    08:08

  • Ukraine safety remains unclear as Trump teases U.S. pledge of security guarantees

    07:35

  •  Why Trump’s rewriting of history at the Smithsonian should concern you

    04:27

Read More

Continue Reading

The Dictatorship

Why it matters that conservatives are claiming victory over Costco

Published

on

Why it matters that conservatives are claiming victory over Costco

On Thursday, Costco said it would not begin stocking the abortion medication mifepristone at its more than 500 pharmacies, and conservative groups declared victory following a yearlong pressure campaign. Whether the groups are actually responsible for the wholesale chain’s decision is unclear, but they are framing it as a success and pledging to target retailers that already dispense the drug, which would be a blow to abortion access.

In August 2024, a coalition including far-right law firm Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF) and Inspire Investing — which bills itself as “empowering Christian investors through biblically responsible investing” — sent letters to Costco, Walmart, Kroger, Albertsons and McKesson urging them not to start dispensing mifepristone. The letter to Costco in particular claimed that 6,000 members signed a petition for it not to stock the drug, implying that they might take their business elsewhere.

A coalition including far-right law firm Alliance Defending Freedom and Inspire Investing — which bills itself as “empowering Christian investors through biblically responsible investing” — sent letters to Costco, Walmart, Kroger, Albertsons and McKesson urging them not to start dispensing mifepristone.

In a statement shared with BLN, Costco said, “Our position at this time not to sell mifepristone, which has not changed, is based on the lack of demand from our members and other patients, who we understand generally have the drug dispensed by their medical providers.”

The company did not respond to a follow-up question about how it assessed demand for a medication it doesn’t dispense. The potential interest wouldn’t be limited to the chain’s paid members, as nonmembers can fill prescriptions at its pharmacies. It also wouldn’t be cabined to abortions, since mifepristone is used off label to manage miscarriages.

The Washington Post reports that Costco had deliberated for more than a year about whether to offer mifepristone and decided this month not to do so; the paper cites anonymous sources familiar with the conversations.

Still, ADF is taking credit for Costco maintaining the status quo. As the organization’s corporate engagement legal counsel Michael Ross told Bloomberg News“It’s a very significant win and it’s one we hope to build on this coming year.” Ross added that ADF will turn its focus to CVS and Walgreens, which have been dispensing the drug in states where abortion is legal since early 2024.

It’s a relatively recent development that pharmacies could even stock this drug, which is typically used alongside misoprostol to end an early pregnancy, and conservatives are trying everything they can to shove the genie back in the bottle.

Mifepristone has long been overregulated in the U.S., and for two decades after its approval, the medication had to be dispensed in person by the health care provider who prescribed it. The Covid pandemic led to prescriptions via telemedicine that could be fulfilled by mail-order pharmacies, a change made permanent in late 2021. Then, in January 2023, the Food and Drug Administration said for the first time that brick-and-mortar pharmacies could dispense the drug. CVS and Walgreens swiftly announced plans to stock the medication in states where it was legal.

A month later, 20 Republican attorneys general wrote to CVS and Walgreens and claimed that they might be in violation of a federal law known as the Comstock Act, an anti-obscenity statute passed in 1873. Conservatives have argued that the long-dormant law prohibits sending abortion-causing drugs and devices through the mail or carriers like UPS and FedEx. But the same day as the pharmacy change, the Biden administration’s Department of Justice released legal guidance saying that the Comstock Act can’t be enforced against the shipment of abortion drugs as long as the sender doesn’t know the pills will be used illegally.

ADF’s letters to Costco and others cited the AGs’ claims on Comstock, and lobbed a threat that a change in administration could result in federal prosecutions should the retailers begin stocking mifepristone. “Last year, 20 attorneys general wrote letters advising pharmacies that receiving and dispensing the drug by mail is expressly prohibited by the Comstock Act and many state laws. Violating the Comstock Act alone carries a prison sentence of up to ten years,” the letters read. “The statute of limitations is five years, so the current political leadership at the U.S. Department of Justice cannot provide you cover if the administration changes parties.”

The bigger picture here is that groups like ADF are not satisfied with only conservative-led states passing abortion bans. Their long-term goal is to ban nearly all abortions nationwide under the 14th Amendmentand they’re hoping that courts will aid them along the way to realizing that project by ruling that the Comstock Act is enforceable, or that the FDA was wrong to allow telemedicine prescriptions, or both.

ADF took a case to the Supreme Court in 2024 from physicians seeking to end telemedicine prescriptions, and while the justices said those plaintiffs didn’t have standing to sue, that litigation continues thanks to three state AGs who joined the case. Missouri AG Andrew Bailey, who organized the letter to CVS and Walgreens, is leading that case. Most of the other AGs who signed the pharmacy letter have also signed an amicus brief supporting the lawsuit.

Abortion pills were used in nearly two-thirds of all documented terminations in the U.S. in 2023, and by the end of 2024, about 1 in 4 abortions were provided via telemedicine. Pharmacies stocking abortion pills would make them more accessible than they already are, which is a threat to conservatives’ current ban-by-a-thousand-cuts strategy.

Abortion pills were used in nearly two-thirds of all documented terminations in the U.S. in 2023.

The Costco pressure campaign underscores that GOP lawmakers and groups like ADF know an abortion ban cannot pass Congress, so they are trying to limit access in other ways, namely by targeting pills and working to shutter clinics. Their goal is to make it so people can only get abortion medication by physically traveling to a shrinking number of clinics, with more set to shutter amid fallout from the GOP budget bill that “defunds” large abortion providers like Planned Parenthood.

Planned Parenthood has said that as many as 200 of its clinics could close as a result of the bill, including 75% of its abortion-providing clinics across 12 states. That’s why the organization calls the law a backdoor abortion ban. Making abortion less accessible functions as an effective ban for some women — all before a possible nationwide ban is in place.

This context is why it’s so disappointing that Costco will not dispense mifepristone, a necessary medication for people who need abortions and people experiencing miscarriages — and one that is set to become increasingly difficult to access. ADF added in a press release after the Bloomberg story that it “applaud[s] Costco for doing the right thing by its shareholders and resisting activist calls to sell abortion drugs.” This isn’t about “selling” abortion pills. It’s about pharmacies being willing to dispense medications that people’s doctors have prescribed them.

The Costco statement said it believed that people “generally” have mifepristone dispensed by their medical providers, not pharmacies. While many people do still receive the pill directly from their doctor either in person or by mailtelemedicine prescriptions are increasingly filled by mail-order pharmacies like Honeybee Healthand of course other pharmacies do dispense the drug. Just not Costco.

Later in the ADF release, the group claimed that dispensing abortion pills is a bad business decision. “Retailers like Costco keep their doors open by selling a lifetime of purchases to families, both large and small,” Ross said. “They have nothing to gain and much to lose by becoming abortion dispensaries. Retail pharmacies exist to serve the health and wellness of their customers, but abortion drugs like mifepristone undermine that mission by putting women’s health at risk.”

Data shows that abortion restrictions are not only bad for people’s healthbut also bad for the economy. The landmark Turnaway Study found that women denied abortions are four times as likely to live below the federal poverty level than women who got care. And in June, the Institute for Women’s Policy Research (IWPR) estimated that the Dobbs decision has led to $64 billion in economic losses each year in the 16 states that ban or heavily restrict abortion. Nationwide, IWPR estimates that bans and other restrictions keep about 550,000 women out of the labor force annually, which is enough to impact GDP, they say.

Corporations may not care about trying to prevent a nationwide abortion access crisis, but they should care about protecting their profits and shareholder value.

SUSPAN goals

Susan Rinkunas is an independent journalist and co-founder of Autonomy News. Her work has appeared in Jezebel, The New Republic, The Guardian, Slate, The Nation and more.

Read More

Continue Reading

The Dictatorship

Vacationing in the United Kingdom, JD Vance is greeted with mocking meme

Published

on

Vacationing in the United Kingdom, JD Vance is greeted with mocking meme

By Are Salam

JD Vance’s track record of eventful travel is stretching on, as the vice president continues to get trolled at home and abroad. Vance and his family traveled last week to the Cotswolds in the United Kingdom — where a British activist group called Everybody Hates Elon rented a truck that displayed an unflattering meme of Vance as it followed him around the countryside.

The image, which shows a bald and wide-eyed Vance with plump cheeks, is the same one that a 21-year old Norwegian tourist said led to him being denied entry to the U.S. after customs officials discovered it on his phone. (U.S. Customs and Border Protection has said the Norwegian was denied entry for admitted drug use.)

CNBC reported:

Vance’s visit to the Cotswolds also gave locals the opportunity to celebrate — by way of a so-called ‘Vance not welcome party.’ A spokesperson for the Stop Trump Coalition, which organized the protest, told CNBC on Wednesday that the gathering of around 80 people — mostly locals — was ‘joyous,’ with a ‘wonderful’ atmosphere.

Meanwhile, in nearby Oxfordshire, residents in the typically quiet area have expressed annoyance at Vance and his large motorcade.

A satirical image of Vice President JD Vance after it was unofficially installed on a billboard in Cheltenham, England.
A satirical image of Vice President JD Vance was unofficially installed on a billboard Wednesday in Cheltenham, England.Leon Neal / Getty Images

On a recent trip to his home state of Ohio for his 41st birthday, Vance’s security detail requested that the Army Corps of Engineers raise the water levels of the Little Miami River ahead of a family kayaking trip — a move that’s drawing scrutiny from congressional Democrats.

Vance also encountered protesters earlier this year during a ski vacation in Vermont.

Last month, Vance and his family visited Disneyland in Southern California, as federal agents conducted immigration raids nearby in Los Angeles.

“Sorry to all the people who were at Disneyland for the longer lines, but we had a very good time,” Vance said afterward, speaking on the podcast of Katie Miller, the wife of White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller.

Vance also told Miller that he really wants to go to Hawaii.

“Hopefully, we can find some excuse as vice president of the United States to go to Hawaii,” Vance told Miller. “Kamala Harris went to Hawaii, so we should be able to find some excuse to go to Hawaii.”

Are Salam

Erum Salam is a breaking news reporter and producer for BLN Digital. She previously was a breaking news reporter for The Guardian.

Read More

Continue Reading

Trending