Connect with us

Congress

DEI not to blame in crash, says top Republican overseeing FAA

Published

on

Rep. Sam Graves, the Missouri Republican in charge of overseeing the Federal Aviation Administration in the House, said Friday that diversity initiatives at the agency had nothing to do with a crash between a commercial airplane and an Army helicopter that killed 67 people earlier this week.

In an interview with Blue Light News, Graves, who chairs the House Transportation Committee and is an experienced private pilot who is rated to fly a commercial airplane, said many questions remain about just what caused the crash. He urged allowing investigators to do their work — but said that he doesn’t believe DEI initiatives played a role, despite insistence to the contrary from President Donald Trump and some others in the GOP.

“I don’t think it had anything to do with this particular accident. I have concerns about DEI within the FAA and for that matter all the transportation agencies, but I’ve had that concern now for years,” Graves said.

Graves noted that the pilots involved were experienced and that there was a “separation issue” between the helicopter and airline that needs to be further investigated. He also said it’s important to wait until all the facts are uncovered before even beginning to consider whether a legislative fix is appropriate.

Graves also sought to reassure a jittery public, saying “air travel is absolutely safe.”

“We have dozens and dozens and dozens of helicopter flights up and down the Potomac and the Anacostia [rivers] every single day and they interact with those airline flights coming in and out,” he said “We have to find out what exactly happened.”

Graves said there is a “hard ceiling” for those helicopters and that preliminary data suggests the helicopter was flying above it. “We have to figure out why that is.”

“These are very experienced pilots, too. We need to get the facts first before we go running off and trying to fix problems that maybe aren’t problems to begin with,” he said.

Graves also said he didn’t believe that a recent memo issued by the Trump administration freezing federal hiring with some exceptions (including for “public safety”) applied to air traffic controllers. (An aide for Graves clarified that it did not apply.)

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Congress

Johnson aims to announce GOP agenda framework on Friday, including permanent tax cuts

Published

on

Speaker Mike Johnson said House Republicans are aiming to announce an overarching framework on their party-line agenda on Friday morning. It would include a permanent extension of the 2017 tax cuts, according to two people who were in a meeting between House Republicans and President Donald Trump Thursday afternoon.

“We’re going to meet again tonight to finish up some final details. I think we’ll be able to make some announcements probably by tomorrow,” Johnson told reporters after a meeting between House Republicans and President Donald Trump. “The idea would be to get the Budget Committee working potentially as early as early next week, maybe Tuesday, for a mark-up of the budget resolution.”

Even hard-liners in the Trump meeting appeared generally onboard, though some differences remain. The bill would aim to address major GOP priorities on taxes, the border, energy, defense and more.

Johnson said his message to Republican senators, who are moving toward a vote on their own resolution next week, is that “we are moving as quickly and expeditiously as possible.” The Senate version would tackle border, energy and defense in a first bill, but push off taxes until later.

Rep. Kevin Hern (R-Okla.) said the same group of Republicans at the Trump meeting, which included leadership and various other lawmakers heavily involved in the budget reconciliation process, would meet again later Thursday.

Mia McCarthy contributed to this report.

Continue Reading

Congress

Committee punts on Kash Patel vote as Democrats keep up the pressure

Published

on

Democrats took advantage of the rules of the Senate Judiciary Committee on Thursday to delay consideration of Kash Patel’s nomination to lead the FBI — but broke some recent precedent in the process.

While lawmakers typically do a one-week punt on Judiciary Committee votes for an variety of reasons — from opposing a bill to nominees — rarely if ever does the panel meet in person to formally approve the delay. Democrats’ vehement opposition to confirming Patel prompted such an in-person gathering.

Democrats had requested a second hearing with Patel to grill him over the recent leadership shakeup at the FBI. They view the staunch Trump loyalist as someone who is prepared to use the pulpit of the FBI to go after political adversaries.

Senate Judiciary Chair Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) had denied Democrats’ pleas, describing on Thursday the meeting as breaking with the panel’s norms. He has said he intends to hold Patel’s committee vote as early as next week.

Continue Reading

Congress

Democratic polling finds Elon Musk is unpopular

Published

on

House Democrats have a plan to help them win back the working class: turn the world’s richest person into their boogeyman.

They’ve set their sights on holding Elon Musk to account, by attempting to subpoena him and introducing legislation to block him from receiving federal contracts while he holds a “special” role inside the government. They believe the idea of an unelected billionaire wreaking chaos on the bureaucracy will be unpopular with voters — and now they have some data to prove it.

New internal polling, conducted on behalf of House Majority Forward, a nonprofit aligned with House Democratic leadership, found Musk is viewed negatively among 1,000 registered voters in battleground districts. His approval rating is upside down (43 percent approve to 51 disapprove) and his favorability is even worse (42 percent favorable to 51 percent unfavorable).

And the survey was completed between Jan. 19-25 — before some of Musk’s more extreme moves as the leader of the Department of Government Efficiency.

Pollsters asked respondents for their thoughts on “the creation of a government of the rich for the rich by appointing up to nine different billionaires to the administration,” and found 70 percent opposed with only 19 percent in support — a stat that suggests Democrats have landed on a message that could gain traction with swing voters.

That data and focus groups held by House Majority Fund helped bring attacks on the administration into focus: Democrats “shouldn’t chide Musk, Trump, and others for being rich,” the group wrote, but point out Musk’s conflicts of interests as head of DOGE and note that he could undermine key safety net programs to enrich himself at the expense of American taxpayers.

“Participants laud Musk’s business acumen and aren’t opposed to the ideals of DOGE,” HMF found. But “Musk’s relationship with Trump – who they view as inherently pro-big business” makes them wary that billionaire’s cuts “could include programs such as Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security.”

Democrats have been in the midst of a deep soul search, trying to figure out how they lost the White House, both chambers of Congress and the working-class voters that had once been the backbone of their party. The Democratic resistance has been muted in the open weeks of Donald Trump’s second term as its members struggle to land on a common theme.

But Musk’s frenzied campaign to eliminate waste and lower spending has rocked the federal bureaucracy. And in recent days, Democrats have seized on Musk and other wealthy members of Trump’s administration as a way to make their case to the working class.

The poll, conducted by the Democratic firm Impact Research, also found that Musk evoked strong negative feelings. Of the 51 percent who viewed him unfavorably, 41 percent found him “very unfavorable.” Of the 51 percent who disapproved of him, 43 percent did so strongly.

Continue Reading

Trending