The Dictatorship
Is a Mars mission going to happen? As soon as Mexico pays for the border wall.
President Donald Trump says we’re going to Mars, but don’t start packing your bags just yet. There are a lot of reasons to doubt that his plans will get us to the Red Planet, and he may even put us further behind schedule.
In his inaugural address Monday, Trump said the country would “pursue our manifest destiny into the stars” and “plant the Stars and Stripes on the planet Mars.”
Almost everything that Trump has said and done indicates that a trip to Mars is about as likely to happen as Trump’s broken first-term promise to repeal Obamacare.
It’s an ambitious goal and one of the few he’s laid out for his second term that has broad support. In a 2023 poll57% of Americans favored sending astronauts to Mars, making it much more popular than Trump’s pardons for Jan. 6 participantsattempt to overturn birthright citizenship and proposal for broad-based tariffs on foreign goodsall of which majorities oppose.
But other than that single sentence, almost everything Trump has said and done indicates that a trip to Mars is about as likely to happen as Trump’s broken first-term promises to repeal Obamacare, make Mexico pay for a border wall and guarantee six weeks of paid family leave.
In that term, Trump also said America would go to Mars, signing legislation that directed NASA to plan a mission that would launch in 2033. But he was so blasé about his own proposal that he apparently forgot about it when holding a video chat with an astronaut that same year, then got annoyed when she noted that the Mars landing wouldn’t happen before he left office.
A trip to Mars was included in the 2024 Republican platformwhich said only that the U.S. would “create a robust Manufacturing Industry in Near Earth Orbit, send American Astronauts back to the Moon, and onward to Mars.” (To be fair, the Democratic platform also included only one sentence, noting that NASA would send Americans “back to the moon and to Mars.”) But Mars does not appear in the Trump campaign’s Agenda 47 list of core promises or the detailed Project 2025 proposal from conservative groups, which doesn’t even have a section on NASA.
Even in these abbreviated references, you might notice a subtle change that could prove consequential. All of them reference America going back to the moon for the first time since 1972 and then to Mars. But Trump skipped past the moon. A clue to the reason for that omission comes from billionaire SpaceX founder Elon Musk, who posted on X in December that “we’re going straight to Mars” and called a moon mission “a distraction.”
NASA hasn’t seen it that way. Its goal has long been to use the planned Artemis moon missions as a first step toward going to Mars, testing the larger crewed spaceships on a trip that would take only days instead of the months it would take to get to Mars — kind of like taking the kids to a nearby Six Flags to see if they’re ready to go to Disney World.
But it sounds like Trump is following Musk’s lead. He has nominated billionaire Jared Isaacman, who has paid for two private trips to space on SpaceX rockets and is close with Musk, to lead NASA. And he skipped over a career official who has defended the Artemis program when appointing an acting administrator to serve until Isaacman can be confirmed. Some NASA observers think Trump will cancel the moon missions.
It’s hard to find the logic in any of this. The directive to return to the moon before going to Mars literally came from Trump himself in his first term. If Trump doesn’t cancel it, NASA is planning to send a crewed spaceship on a flyby of the moon in 2026 and land on the moon in 2027. Unlike John F. Kennedy, whose moon shot was finally achieved under his one-time opponent, Richard Nixon, Trump could celebrate his own moon mission while still serving as president.
Trump clearly wants some kind of a space triumph. He created the Space Force and said he wanted to go to Mars by the end of his first term. He said at a rally with Musk in October that America would go to Mars before the end of his second term, though he didn’t specify whether that meant an unmanned spacecraft or actual American space boots on the ground.
He’s not the first president to propose going to Mars. President George H.W. Bush and his son George W. Bush both proposed sending astronauts to the Red Planet. But while popular, the idea often founders because it’s so costly. A 2016 estimate put the figure at half a trillion dollars. The price has only gone up since then, and we still don’t have the technology to keep astronauts alive on such a long ride or develop the fuel for a return trip.
Because missions to Mars can only happen when the two planets are relatively close to each other, there’s basically only one chance to send a spaceship there during Trump’s second term, which would be in late 2026, which is far too soon given the technological limitations we’re already up against.
To sum it all up: Trump appears ready to upend years of planning for a moon mission that he proposed in favor of a dramatic new plan to go to Mars that has not been fleshed out in any way, likely as a favor to a billionaire friend who would personally benefit if NASA awarded a contract worth hundreds of billions of dollars to his company and on behalf of a promise that requires developing and launching unproven technology in the next two years. That’s not gonna happen.
This is a moon shot proposal that won’t take us back to the moon, and likely won’t take us to Mars, either.
Ryan Teague Beckwith is a newsletter editor for BLN. He has previously worked for such outlets as Time magazine, Bloomberg News and CQ Roll Call. He teaches journalism at Georgetown University’s School of Continuing Studies.
The Dictatorship
Trump is right that an NFL team should hire John Harbaugh. But everybody knows that.
ByJason Page
The Baltimore Ravens’ decision to fire Super Bowl-winning head Coach John Harbaugh after Sunday’s season-ending loss to the Pittsburgh Steelers kept them out of the playoffs wasn’t surprising to those of us who closely follow the NFL. Harbaugh had coached the team for 18 years, the Ravens had underperformed, and sometimes a new voice is needed in the locker room.
Sports teams have often had to choose between a coach who’s been successful in the past and a superstar player they need to be successful now. In this case, the Ravens had to choose between Harbaugh, who won Super Bowl XLVII in 2012 and quarterback Lamar Jackson, a two-time NFL MVP.
The Ravens underperformed, and sometimes a new voice is needed in the locker room.
If changes are to come, then the Ravens’ salary constraints necessitated Harbaugh that Harbaugh be the one to go. Harbaugh knows the industry as well as anyone and surely understands why the Ravens decided as they did. And because he’s still under contract for two more seasons, he’ll still be getting paid.
But Wednesday morning, a typical end-of-the-season-coach-carousel story got injected with politics when President Donald Trump made a Truth Social post directed at other NFL teams that read: “HIRE JOHN HARBAUGH, FAST. HE, AND HIS BROTHER, ARE TOTAL WINNERS!!!”
It’s worth noting that Harbaugh and his brother Los Angeles Chargers Coach Jim Harbaugh met President Trump in the Oval Office in July. John Harbaugh defended his decision to meet with Trump to a reporter at Ravens training camp who asked why he’d meet with him after Trump’s disparaging remarks about Baltimore. “It was amazing. It was awesome. And I promise you, I root for our president,” Harbaugh said as he criticized the framing of the question. “I want our president to be successful just like I want my quarterback to be successful, and I want my team to be successful,” Harbaugh said, adding that he’d also met presidents Obama and Biden.
What a crew — the Harbaugh brothers and Nvidia CEO hanging with Trump today in the Oval Office. pic.twitter.com/i4K7p6cTSB
— Clay Travis (@ClayTravis) July 11, 2025
Trump is infamously transactional. Was his social media post simply him returning the favor after Harbaugh had kind words about his visit to the White House? Probably. Can anybody recall another instance where the President has weighed in on a professional head coach’s firing?
But Trump needn’t have bothered trying to sell the NFL on Harbaugh. Teams already know who he is. And he has plenty options.
In fact, his agent Bryan Harlan said that 7 different teams reached out expressing their interest within 45 minutes of Harbaugh’s firing. ESPN’s Adam Schefter reported that two NFL teams that don’t even have open head coaching positions were among those that inquired. Who knows how many more teams have reached out since then.
Trump needn’t have bothered trying to sell the NFL on Harbaugh. Teams already know who he is.
His destination may largely depend on what Harbaugh values. If sticking it to the Ravens is important to him, then he could choose the division rival Cleveland Browns, who just fired Coach Kevin Stefanski. The Browns have a young up-and-coming quarterback in Shedeur Sanders and a future Hall-of-Fame defensive star in Myles Garrett. But the Browns have been mostly disastrous under owner Jimmy Haslam’s watch. So maybe not.
The Giants have a young stud quarterback in Jaxson Dart and a group of talented young players on both sides of the ball. But the New York media has eaten alive some of the best when things don’t go well. Does Harbaugh want that kind of challenge?
The Cardinals, Falcons, Titans and Raiders all have openings as well. The Cardinals and Falcons have questions about the starting quarterback position that are unresolved. The Titans have 2025’s No. 1-pick Cam Ward but a less than appetizing cast around him. The Raiders are the Raiders. Or are they? Minority Owner Tom Brady is taking a more assertive role in the teams activities. Could they make a huge play for Harbaugh? More importantly, could he be tempted by the opportunity to lead the Raiders out of what seems like an eternity of darkness?
Despite Trump’s push for Harbaugh’s immediate hiring, there is one last option for the 63-year-old coach. He could do nothing. He could take time off. Or — like Super Bowl-winning Coach Sean Payton did between leaving the New Orleans Saints and signing with the Denver Broncos — Harbaugh could jump into the broadcast booth.
He’ll be a hot commodity this year and, if he wanted to take a break, then he can rest assured knowing he’d be just as hot of a commodity a year from now.
But that seems to me to be the least likely option. Harbaugh is uber-competitive, and there are teams that need a coach. And they don’t need any prodding from Trump to reach out.
Jason Page
Jason Page is the host of the nationally syndicated daily TV show “SportsWrap w/Jason Page.”
The Dictatorship
Trumpism was always going to lead to a tragedy like the Minneapolis ICE shooting
ByAlan Elrod
In a MS NOW column last May, I wrote that Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) actions were becoming so reckless that a fatal encounter was all but inevitable. On Wednesday, my prediction sadly came true, as an agent shot a woman at close range in Minneapolis during an immigration enforcement action, killing her.
President Trump posted on social media that the woman was a “professional agitator” who “ran over” the agent (which video plainly shows is not true), while members of the Trump administration are already calling her a “domestic terrorist.” Accounts like Libs of TikTok leapt to argue that the Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents were acting in self-defense and that the driver had attempted to “ram” them.
This moment was always going to come. It is the logical result of Trumpism and MAGA extremism, both in theory and practice.
We don’t know what transpired before the multiple videos of the incident begin, but, several camera angles seem to indicate that the use of force was unnecessary. Rep. Eric Swalwell, D-Calif. posted to X“Enough. This is murder. Local officials must prosecute ICE. And Congress should strip them of their immunity.”
This moment was always going to come. It is the logical result of Trumpism and MAGA extremism, both in theory and practice.
First, ICE’s application of lethal violence is the natural product of an administration animated by violence as a core feature of its politics. Trump has repeatedly called for people to “beat the hell” out of his opponents. DHS Secretary Kristi Noem has put the spectacle of violence at the center of her propaganda efforts, even posing in front of CECOT prisoners in a photo op that I compared at the time to a lynching postcard. Violence and the performance of violence are everywhere.
Amid this backdrop of bloodlust, ICE has waged a recruitment drive drenched in war metaphors and martial imagery. The type of person sought by DHS to perform immigration enforcement is someone with a fervor for guns and an eagerness to apply violence.

As Drew Harwell and Joyce Sohyun Lee recently reported for the Washington Postthis has become an explicit tactic within the agency, circulated in what DHS calls its “wartime recruitment” strategy. They note that DHS’ strategy was to direct recruitment to “people with an interest in ‘military and veterans’ affairs,’ ‘physical training,’ or ‘conservative news and politics,’ and would target people whose lifestyles are ‘patriotic’ or ‘conservative-leaning.’” DHS also sought to target conservative radio show listeners, and users with interests in “conservative thought leaders, gun rights organizations [and] tactical gear brands.”
This is an administration built on a fundamentally violent worldview, nourishing violent impulses within the national community and seeking out the most brutish among us to implement its draconian policies.
The MAGA view is that ICE’s actions — like all state actions against unprotected groups — must be presumed to be always already legitimate.
But all the cultivation and direction of violence against both immigrants and American citizens is possible because of a second feature of Trumpism: the friend/enemy distinction. This idea, which comes from Nazi theorist Carl Schmitt, has become, as Zack Beauchamp has argued, an energizing logic on the right. Beauchamp summarizes“Schmitt’s chief insight into democracy was seeing how the politics of illiberal groupism, of replacing ‘all men are created equal’ with ‘friend and enemy,’ could justify a brand of authoritarian politics in seemingly democratic terms.”
In essence, some people belong to favored “friend” groups. Everyone else is an enemy, outside the normal presumptions and protections of the state.
Major MAGA influencers like Robby Starbuck and Nick Sortor have already linked the ICE shooting incident to the police murder of George Floyd, suggesting Democrats intend to lie about the shooting to foment unrest. Sortor even called for the jailing of Minneapolis mayor Jacob Frey, accusing him of “trying to spark a riot.”
The MAGA view is that ICE’s actions — like all state actions against unprotected groups — must be presumed to be always already legitimate. Opposition to those actions must consequently be presumed to be illegitimate and dangerous.
This is not a formula for state accountability. It’s a recipe for authoritarianism.

The cumulative implication of all this is simple: immigrants and those who want to see them treated humanely are not subject to the same rights and protections as MAGA Americans. This also explains the demands of commentators like The Daily Wire’s Matt Walsh that New York City mayor Zohran Mamdani be stripped of his U.S. citizenship. It explains the extrapolation of the fraud scandal in Minnesota into an excuse to deport Somali-Americans.
ICE, as it exists, is about the raw application of Trumpist authoritarianism. And they’re seeking the most violent and illiberal among us to implement its mission. This was always going to happen. And it is almost certainly going to happen again.
Alan Elrod
Alan Elrod is the president and CEO of The Pulaski Institution, a new think tank dedicated to the connection between global politics and economics and heartland areas. He lives outside Little Rock, Arkansas.
The Dictatorship
ICE agent’s fatal shooting of Minneapolis woman instantly becomes politicized
An Immigration and Customs Enforcement agent shot and killed a woman Wednesday during an operation in Minneapolis, immediately escalating tensions over the Trump administration’s decision to send some 2,000 immigration agents into the city.
“We’ve dreaded this moment since the early stages of this ICE presence in Minneapolis,” an angry Mayor Jacob Frey said at an afternoon news conference. Federal agents, he said, are “sowing chaos on our streets, and in this case, quite literally killing people.”
The Minnesota Star Tribuneidentified the woman as 37-year old Renee Nicole Good. Good’s mother, Donna Ganger, told the outlet that her daughter was “loving, forgiving and affectionate” and that she was “probably terrified” during the encounter.
The incident, coming on the heels of the Trump administration’s expanded immigration operations in blue states and cities, immediately became politicized. After watching video of the encounter, President Donald Trump claimed the woman who was shot “violently, willfully, and viciously ran over the ICE Officer, who seems to have shot her in self defense.” He also said it was “hard to believe” that the ICE agent is alive and added that he is recovering at a hospital.
Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem said in a Wednesday evening news conference that the woman was “blocking” officers who were attempting to dislodge their vehicle from the snow.
“ICE agents repeatedly ordered her to get out of the car and to stop obstructing law enforcement. But she refused to obey their commands,” Noem said. “She then proceeded to weaponize her vehicle and she attempted to run a law enforcement officer over.”
Noem said the ICE officer, “fearing for his life and the other officers around him and the safety of the public,” fired shots defensively.
Noem said the officer had been released from the hospital and was with family. “Any loss of life is a tragedy…all of us agree in this situation, it was preventable,” she said.
The incident, coming on the heels of the Trump administration’s expanded immigration operations in blue states and cities, immediately became politicized.
Democrats, however — including Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz, with whom Noem said she spoke — questioned Trump and Noem’s accounting of the events. Walz warned in his own press conference that Trump “would make this about me” and that the shooting was “so, so preventable” and “so unnecessary.”
Walz called on Minnesotans to remain calm and said he is prepared to activate the National Guard if needed. Police Chief Brian O’Hara toldMinneapolis his officers last month to intervene if they see ICE agents using excessive force against residents or risk losing their jobs.
Homeland Security spokesperson Tricia McLaughlin said officers were “conducting targeted operations when rioters began blocking ICE officers and one of these violent rioters weaponized her vehicle, attempting to run over our law enforcement officers in an attempt to kill them — an act of domestic terrorism.”
McLaughlin said the officer feared for his life and “the safety of the public.”
“He used his training and saved his own life and that of his fellow officers,” she said. “The alleged perpetrator was hit and is deceased. Thankfully, the ICE officers who were hurt are expected to make full recoveries.”
And Stephen Millera senior presidential aide and architect of Trump’s mass deportation strategy, called video he posted of the incident “domestic terrorism.”
Local Minneapolis officials, however, feel differently.
According to Frey’s office, Minneapolis police officers responded to the reports of shots fired “just after 9:30 a.m., and found a woman with life-threatening gunshot wounds. Minneapolis firefighters removed the woman from the vehicle and immediately began lifesaving measures until paramedics could respond.” She was transported to a local hospital, where she eventually died.
Frey accused the Trump administration of trying to “spin this as an action of self-defense.”
“Having seen the video … myself, I want to tell everybody directly that is bullshit,” the mayor said. “This was an agent recklessly using power that resulted in somebody dying, getting killed.”
House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., was similarly skeptical.
“There is no evidence that has been presented to justify this killing. [DHS] Secretary Kristi Noem is a stone-cold liar and has zero credibility. The masked ICE agent who pulled the trigger should be criminally investigated to the full extent of the law for acting with depraved indifference to human life,” Jeffries said.
Former Vice President Kamala Harris called the incident “shocking,” and said the video “makes it clear that the Trump administration’s explanation of this shooting is pure gaslighting.”
O’Hara said the woman was not the target of the law enforcement investigation, was unarmed and was shot in the head.

Bystander video verified by MS NOW clearly contradicts key parts of Trump’s description. It shows the car partially blocking a two-lane street in a snowy residential neighborhood.
The footage, which begins moments before the shooting, shows a handful of people milling about, filming the agents as they walk around and toward the vehicle. Whistles — a tactic used by “ICE observers” to warn people that agents are in the area — can be heard.
One of the officers puts his hand on the driver’s door handle and loudly repeats, “Get out of the car!”
The car briefly moves in reverse, then starts to drive off when three gunshots ring out, and the car crashes into a parked vehicle. The officer who fired his gun was standing in the street in the direction the car was facing.
The agent holding the door handle stumbles but stays on his feet as the car drives off. None of the other officers comes in contact with the car, and none appears significantly injured, if at all.
Several people at the scene are heard yelling expletives right after the shots were fired.
Residents who spoke to MS NOW at the scene said they saw what appeared to be blood on the deployed airbag on the driver’s side.
Shortly after the shooting, residents gathered around federal agents in vehicles, shouting at them and calling the location a crime scene.
The Trump administration launched a massive immigration enforcement operation in the Minneapolis area this week, deploying approximately 2,000 federal agents to the state.
Federal law enforcement officials have been sent to other Democratic-led cities over the past year, sparking fierce criticism from local lawmakers.
In October, a federal agent shot a woman five times during an immigration crackdown in Chicago in what the administration similarly characterized as a defensive act. Federal prosecutors brought assault charges against her, but moved to dismissthem after the agent’s text messages bragging about the shootingwere presented in court.
At the news conference, Frey addressed the federal immigration enforcement agency directly.
“I have a message for ICE: Get the fuck out of Minneapolis. We do not want you here,” he said.
This is a developing story. Please check back for updates.
___
Nnamdi Egwuonwu contributed to this report.
Alex Tabet is a reporter for MS NOW.
Clarissa-Jan Lim is a breaking news reporter for MS NOW. She was previously a senior reporter and editor at BuzzFeed News.
Erum Salam is a breaking news reporter and producer for MS NOW. She previously was a breaking news reporter for The Guardian.
-
The Dictatorship11 months agoLuigi Mangione acknowledges public support in first official statement since arrest
-
Politics11 months agoBlue Light News’s Editorial Director Ryan Hutchins speaks at Blue Light News’s 2025 Governors Summit
-
The Dictatorship4 months agoMike Johnson sums up the GOP’s arrogant position on military occupation with two words
-
Politics11 months agoFormer ‘Squad’ members launching ‘Bowman and Bush’ YouTube show
-
Politics11 months agoFormer Kentucky AG Daniel Cameron launches Senate bid
-
The Dictatorship11 months agoPete Hegseth’s tenure at the Pentagon goes from bad to worse
-
Uncategorized1 year ago
Bob Good to step down as Freedom Caucus chair this week
-
Politics9 months agoDemocrat challenging Joni Ernst: I want to ‘tear down’ party, ‘build it back up’





