Connect with us

Congress

First step on reconciliation in limbo amid GOP infighting

Published

on

Republicans are looking to take the first step to jumpstart the budget reconciliation bill: writing the instructions that will govern the terms of the package. But they’re stuck in limbo amid an ongoing debate about whether to go with a one- or two-bill strategy.

House and Senate Republican leaders have been struggling to decide if they’ll pass one package on the border, taxes and energy, or whether to do two bills that splits off taxes.

To start the reconciliation process, Budget committees in both chambers have to write instructions that would both detail how many bills they plan to pass and direct relevant committees to develop language. It’s the first formal step in the budget reconciliation process, which would allow Republicans to pass priorities without help from Democrats.

But Senate Budget Chair Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) signaled Monday that they’re still discussing the terms and lawmakers haven’t written the instructions yet.

“Well, we’re going to be talking about that,” Graham told reporters when asked if his committee is moving forward with instructions yet.

Graham also indicated he had concerns about putting everything in one package, worried that taxes could delay border policies that could be in a separate bill.

“I think it would be smart to increase military spending and give the money Trump needs to deport people and secure the border early on. I just think the national security implications of delay are pretty significant,” he said.

Republicans on Capitol Hill are now weeks into debate over whether to break off tax cut proposals into their own separate bill so they can pass priorities on the border and energy more quickly. Speaker Mike Johnson has recently been selling his colleagues on a one-bill strategy while Senate Majority Leader John Thune has backed the two-bill push. Incoming President Donald Trump has said he prefers one package, but that he’s open to two bills as well.

Many Republicans on Capitol Hill say they will defer to Trump’s preference on how to move forward.

“Whatever direction President Trump wants us to go in, that’s the direction. If he wants one beautiful bill, we’ll do one beautiful bill. If he wants two beautiful bills, we’ll do two beautiful bills,” Rep. Brian Mast (R-Fla.) said Monday.

But Republicans need to move forward with writing the reconciliation instructions soon if they want to hold to their ambitious timeline of moving at least one bill by the end of April. Negotiations will likely only get more complicated from here — the instructions are typically considered a simpler part.

“We ought to get something done, hopefully, in the month of January,” Sen. Rick Scott (R-Fla.) said Monday.

Mia McCarthy contributed to this report. 

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Congress

Kiley switches parties, loses committees

Published

on

Rep. Kevin Kiley, the former Republican who recently registered as an Independent, said in an interview Wednesday he plans to caucus with the House GOP and will seek to regain his committee assignments.

The California lawmaker was formally removed from his panels Wednesday after giving official notice he was switching parties to serve as an Independent and run in a new district after his state redrew congressional maps.

The House GOP Steering Committee will need to approve Kiley’s effort to take back his seats on Education and the Workforce, Transportation and Infrastructure and Judiciary. Kiley told reporters this was “completely expected” and that he looked “forward to being reappointed as an Independent.”

Mia McCarthy contributed to this report.

Continue Reading

Congress

Tim Scott to run for reelection to the Senate

Published

on

Sen. Tim Scott (R-S.C.) will run for reelection in 2028, his campaign told Blue Light News on Wednesday, reversing a promise to serve just two full terms in the chamber.

Appointed by then-Gov. Nikki Haley to serve out the last two years of outgoing Sen. Jim DeMint’s Senate term in 2012, Scott had long said that 2022 would mark his final bid for the Senate.

He easily won reelection that year, besting Democratic state lawmaker Krystle Matthews by more than 25 percentage points. Scott then ran for president but abandoned his short-lived bid for the White House before the Iowa caucuses.

He was briefly considered to serve as now-President Donald Trump’s running mate and has since emerged as a key White House ally in the Senate.

“And I’ll say without any question that as I think about my own reelection in 2028, I think about all the lessons I’ve learned on the campaign trail for all these other candidates, and frankly, even in South Carolina,” Scott told the Charleston, South Carolina-based Post and Courier, which was first to report his reelection plans.

Continue Reading

Congress

Quick vote on Mullin’s DHS nomination hangs on classified briefing

Published

on

Hopes for a quick vote on Sen. Markwayne Mullin’s nomination as Homeland Security secretary hang on questions about secretive travel the Oklahoma Republican undertook as a House member a decade ago that are now being examined by his Senate colleagues.

Mullin was questioned extensively about the matter Wednesday by Sens. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) and Gary Peters (D-Mich.), the chair and ranking member, respectively, of the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee.

Testifying under oath Wednesday, Mullin said he participated in what he described as “official travel” and a “classified trip” as part of a “special program inside the House” that went from 2015 to 2016. He said he was not a member of the House Intelligence Committee at the time and refused to answer further questions outside of a classified setting.

The attention on the matter came after Peters raised questions about Mullin’s past claims suggesting he had traveled to war zones and had first-hand exposure to combat environments despite his lack of a military background.

After the hearing adjourned Wednesday afternoon, Mullin joined Paul, Peters and other members of the committee in the Senate’s classified briefing facility.

“I’m one of these people who think that we silo off too much information from the public,” Paul told reporters after the hearing. “When we’re going to war, they tell eight people, it’s like, ‘Oh, we’ve notified Congress.’ So I don’t think that is adequate.”

“It makes people curious when you say, I’m doing secret missions for somebody, but I won’t tell you who, and only four people in the world know about those,” Paul added.

Mullin said only four people were “read into” the program in question and declined to say publicly what agencies or committees were involved.

“It’s a little difficult for us to go ask about a program that has no name and we have nobody that we know to talk to about it,” Peters said before Mullin agreed to the classified meeting. “So I don’t know how we would begin doing this without your cooperation.”

The questions about the shadowy travel erupted after Mullin’s nomination suddenly turned rocky after Paul questioned his temperament and fitness for office based on his past comments and behavior.

Paul later confirmed he would oppose Mullin’s nomination but said he still intended to hold a committee vote Thursday. To get through the panel with Paul opposed, Mullin will need the support of at least one Democrat.

Sen. John Fetterman (D-Pa.) has suggested he is inclined to support Mullin but declined to confirm Wednesday he would vote for him. Fetterman was among the senators spotted entering the classified meeting following the hearing.

“I’m willing to hold the vote tomorrow, but you brought this up that you were on a super secret mission,” Paul told Mullin at the hearing.

“No, I did not say super secret,” Mullin responded. “I said it was classified.”

Continue Reading

Trending